Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2013 Boss 302 versus 2012 CTS-V

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by SMKR View Post
    2013 gt500 will eat that ctsv for lunch
    Bugatti veyron would eat that gt500 for dinner.

    Great post.
    "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

    Comment


    • #32
      Not to mention that the Caddy weighs 4222lbs and the Boss weighs 3621lbs!! Spank!!!

      Comment


      • #33
        The boss looks like more fun, but damn those caddys are fast.

        Comment


        • #34
          I would love a 2011+ CTS-V coupe!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Lason View Post
            I would love a 2011+ CTS-V coupe!
            They need to build a 2 door CTS-V wagon. GM might possibly get me back if they'd do that.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by jdgregory84 View Post
              Bugatti veyron would eat that gt500 for dinner.

              Great post.
              Bugatti has no relation to either car in the original post, so your post was fucking stupid. Put a mustang up against the ctsv that is more comprable.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by SMKR View Post
                Bugatti has no relation to either car in the original post, so your post was fucking stupid. Put a mustang up against the ctsv that is more comprable.
                Your post is even more retarded because the Boss and V are much closer in acceleration than a V would be against a new GT500. The new GT500 would work a nearly stock V. It would be a boring video.
                Ford
                GM
                Toyota
                VAG

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by SMKR View Post
                  Bugatti has no relation to either car in the original post, so your post was fucking stupid. Put a mustang up against the ctsv that is more comprable.
                  Your sarcasm meter needs to be replaced

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I wonder how many Boss owners use the car for what it's made for (which isn't drag racing).
                    HD Parts
                    paul@maverickhd.com

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by 89stangGT View Post
                      I wonder how many Boss owners use the car for what it's made for (which isn't drag racing).
                      No more than the original Boss 302 was used for I'm sure, a lot of those Trans Am series cars saw plenty of time on the drag strip instead of the road course.
                      "It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by 89stangGT View Post
                        I wonder how many Boss owners use the car for what it's made for (which isn't drag racing).
                        Maybe a handful if even that.
                        2010 F-350 6.4L SRW CC 4X4

                        Spartan tunes, 5 inch flo-pro, 4 inch down pipe, cold side piping, AFE stage 2 CAI, EGR delete, Air Dog II

                        2012 Mustang 5.0 GT Stock........for now.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I always see at least one or two new Bosses at the track days around DFW. % wise, I'm sure it's still small who track their cars but that's the same with most track "ready" cars people can buy.
                          Ford
                          GM
                          Toyota
                          VAG

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            People act like they were surprised that a 575hp car beat a 444hp car from a roll. I predicted the outcome before we ran them... I knew. Than after I heard he had a CAI, it was just a metter of how much more to me... lol

                            I've owned/own several "fast" cars... Figuring the out who is going to win isn't rocket science. If the car down beat the CTS-V, then that would have been worth talking about.

                            Guys seriously.. Hp to weight is 10 hp for ever100 lbs..

                            Weight advantage 650-700 lbs...
                            Cts-v +120..

                            = boss still down 50 to 60 hp..

                            Seems like a no brainer

                            As far as the auto numbers.. I dont care what the dyno reads. The a6 is faster and quicker than the manual.. Do research..

                            Again the cts v was modded vs a stock boss.. The magazines all have the cts-v 117-119 in the magazines vs 114-115 for the boss stock before the extra 25 hp from the cai added by the cts-v.. Again, you have to be niave to think the out come would be different.

                            This was no more about shits and giggles reunion and fun between two friends.

                            --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Last edited by xstang; 06-17-2012, 08:35 PM.
                            Slow C6..

                            Few bolt-ons...

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              CTS-V looks so much better and yes the race with darkness was very close
                              sigpic
                              2010 Dallas Performance built Grand Sport

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by xstang View Post
                                People act like they were surprised that a 575hp car beat a 444hp car from a roll. I predicted the outcome before we ran them... I knew. Than after I heard he had a CAI, it was just a metter of how much more to me... lol

                                I've owned/own several "fast" cars... Figuring the out who is going to win isn't rocket science. If the car down beat the CTS-V, then that would have been worth talking about.

                                Guys seriously.. Hp to weight is 10 hp for ever100 lbs..

                                Weight advantage 650-700 lbs...
                                Cts-v +120..

                                = boss still down 50 to 60 hp..

                                Seems like a no brainer

                                As far as the auto numbers.. I dont care what the dyno reads. The a6 is faster and quicker than the manual.. Do research..

                                Again the cts v was modded vs a stock boss.. The magazines all have the cts-v 117-119 in the magazines vs 114-115 for the boss stock before the extra 25 hp from the cai added by the cts-v.. Again, you have to be niave to think the out come would be different.

                                This was no more about shits and giggles reunion and fun between two friends.

                                --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                What about the 13 Boss pulling the ZL1 on Tech? 444>580... Completely nulifies your benchrace math since the Camaro weighs the same or less than a 4dr V and has basically the same engine.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X