Question for anyone here...

[LANTIRN]

That has more to do with the earth running out of resources then government power.

You obviously have not been paying attention; protecting the earth and all of this global warming bs are the excuses governments are using to impose more regulations and taxes to control the people. You bitch about these controls but then use the same reasoning to limit kids.

[mikec]

I love how you are worried about big government but you want them to limit how many kids people can have. Move to China, asshole.

Boosh! As I was reading it I was thinking about China, and how they limit their population to only one child per...

That said, Jason's a good guy, just doing his job and exhibiting the characteristics that come with it. I really don't think you can help it when you consider the fact that it truly is an "us against them" type of mentality that is required to be successful. Hell, look at the hell they catch from this site alone, which is for the most part a conservative site that for the most part supports law enforcement. Or at least the non-revenue generating boot on the throat faction that the job used to represent... 8)

[Cooter]

I love how you are worried about big government but you want them to limit how many kids people can have. Move to China, asshole.

as long as taxpayers are paying to support them, they should have a say in how many people have

[LANTIRN]

as long as taxpayers are paying to support them, they should have a say in how many people have

He did not mention welfare recipients; he implied those rules should apply to all. If we are talking about welfare recipients there are a ton of restrictions I think that should be put on them. However we need to leave others out if it; I am sick of these power grabs.

[majorownage]

When people ask me why I never had kids my standard response is because we are all ready sucking the earth dry and in the future we will run out of resources. They should limit people to two kids.

Holy fuck you are dumb.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

There are ways to starve the beast if only everybody would do it

[mikec]

There are ways to starve the beast if only everybody would do it

Please elaborate. Many of us are all ears...

[sc281]

Holy fuck you are dumb.

Pot?

[Cooter]

He did not mention welfare recipients; he implied those rules should apply to all. If we are talking about welfare recipients there are a ton of restrictions I think that should be put on them. However we need to leave others out if it; I am sick of these power grabs.

Sorry, I listen to NPR all day and hear all these people all over the world talking about their kids going hungry and the hard lives their children have and all I can think is "why the fuck did you have them?"

[kingjason]

Holy fuck you are dumb.

Thank you for adding your insight on the subject at hand. Your comment has increased the content of this thread greatly. In the case of your parents maybe it should have been one less than the number they had. Cooter realized where I was going with that even though it should probably be a different thread. I was just adding a comment based on what was said above me. I do believe there will come a time thru better education and less religious encouragement people will choose to have less children. On the other hand when you start saying people can not have kids on a financial basis you open a whole different can of worms, even though we as tax payers should have more of a voice then the non tax payers.

I would gladly negotiate thirty of your "rights violating laws" to add in limiting the amount of kids people can have. Not because I want the government to control our lives but because you are retarded if you think the earth can sustain a continued huge population growth. Cooter is also correct in believing most intelligent people do not have an assload of kids. Most intelligent people could actually go thru life with no law enforcement and no government assistance what so ever. However for every intelligent person there is probably three idiots that think whats your is theirs and need a little direction in their lives.

The argument about other forms of regulation does not hold water because we all know there may be fuzzy math in several global warming schemes but there is no guess work on what is needed to sustain life.

[ceyko]

Idiocracy family tree thing, and then too much growth. I'd say there are more than 3 for every common sense oriented person out there.

[Vertnut]

Interesting thread. I think Talisman is pretty close with his assessment, and I think we're starting to see the "beginning of the end", in a way. When you see states like California, New York, Michigan, etc, losing PRODUCTIVE taxpayers to states like Texas (huge influx), it's a trend that won't stop. The "have's" are tired of paying for the "have not's". The "poor" in this country have flat screen TV's, iphones, nice vehicles, and a long list of government assistance that includes everything from free health care to free meals in schools. There's not a lot of motivation for folks to do better when everything is handed to them.
In the early '70's, me, my mom, and my two younger sister's, lived in subsidized housing for 2 years. Even at 12 years old, I saw enough wasted people and wasted money to know I would never live that way as an adult.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

And yet, no one wants to address the overpopulation problem. I say we need 1 child limit in usa from now on.

[ceyko]

And yet, no one wants to address the overpopulation problem. I say we need 1 child limit in usa from now on.

Only citizens would get stuck with that burden. All the illegals and such would still do what they are going to do.

Fixing immigration problems will go much further than doing that. Also, although I only was planning on 1 child I got twins. I'd destroy anyone who tried to take either of them from me at anytime from the pregnancy until now.

Not to mention, that's a bit against our culture.

[mikec]

And yet, no one wants to address the overpopulation problem. I say we need 1 child limit in usa from now on.

Define overpopulation.