So who is the next GOP candidate

[CJ]

I'm going to educate you on how little you know. Because someone here needs to do this. The thing I have difficult with is you don't understand republicans, you demagog. I understand democrats. You need to also if you want to have an educated discussion. I would tolerate this kind of ignorance if I was arguing with some unintelligent idiot, but I think there is an opportunity for you to grasp the right's perspective if you're willing to learn.

Are you denying that part of the RNC's platform was no abortions?

The Republican's position is not to eliminate abortion. Unfortunately the sensational fear tactics you cheerlead are misrepresented. The republican's position is not to have state sponsored and tax paid abortions (it is a federal law in place). Most conservatives when asked will tell you they are pro-life, but they all do not wish to push that belief onto citizens. What you are attemping to do is take a candidate (who lost, and was reprimanded by the GOP, who is the party you're attempting to place blame on).

Are you denying Akin's comments and the lackluster protest from the RNC only after the huge uproar?

Are you denying Mourdock's?
Open your mind to the fact that many people don't think like you and those things are significant. You can justify it to your self that they're idiots and your the only one that's right, but in reality the real right is somewhere in the middle.

Why would I deny his comments? He said stupid things, he lost his election. I did not support these stupid ass comments. Just like I'm sure you don't support Weiner sending underaged girls pictures of himself in his underwear. However, unlike yourself I am able to understand that his dumb ass comments, lies, and actions do not represent the democratic party as a whole.

[The King]

Well you obviously are concerned with the debt, they're not. They're concerned with women's right's, your not that concerned with protecting women's rights judging by your stand on abortion. Am I wrong?

Concerned with the debt, yes you are correct.

I have never posted my stand on abortion, so you are making an incorrect assumption by stating that I am not that concerned with protecting women's rights. However, my stand on abortion is this: no man is even remotely qualified to render an opinion regarding abortion since he can not ever be the one directly impacted. That choice should be reserved only to individual women themselves providing abortion remains legal under U.S. law, although as I stated above I do not necessarily consider myself qualified to render even that opinion.

[4eyedwillie]

I'm not going to lose anything, as Ryan would not be "my" candidate. If he were chosen he would be chosen by consensus.

Abortion and women's rights are indeed VERY important, but are not the ONLY matter of importance regardless of what one-issue voters may think.

You as in GOP.
I didn't say they were the only thing that matters. The debt is a one issue voter ideal from the Right. It is important, but to many people there are more important issues.

[4eyedwillie]

The war on women you keep referencing doesn't exist. The republicans have no interest in any of the propaganda the left is feeding you (that you're lapping up). Obama accomplished nothing in office, they have to create fear tactics to change the subject.

Are you denying that part of the RNC's platform was no abortions?
Are you denying Akin's comments and the lackluster protest from the RNC only after the huge uproar?
Are you denying Mourdock's?
Open your mind to the fact that many people don't think like you and those things are significant. You can justify it to your self that they're idiots and your the only one that's right, but in reality the real right is somewhere in the middle.

[4eyedwillie]

Did you look at the popular vote numbers? I wouldn't call 2.3% too much more...

Stevo

Was it enough?

[CJ]

Well you obviously are concerned with the debt, they're not. They're concerned with women's right's, your not that concerned with protecting women's rights judging by your stand on abortion. Am I wrong?

The war on women you keep referencing doesn't exist. The republicans have no interest in any of the propaganda the left is feeding you (that you're lapping up). Obama accomplished nothing in office, they have to create fear tactics to change the subject. The debt will ruin this country, being irresponsible is very popular right now. You are advocating irresponsibility right this very moment, you don't seem concerned. Being an adult is a difficult sell.

[4eyedwillie]

You have absolutely no idea of what my priorities are in reality, proving that you, yourself, are ignorant by making presumptions about them.

LOL at your use of "them" and "ones like you". What a simpleton you seem to be......

Well you obviously are concerned with the debt, they're not. They're concerned with women's right's, your not that concerned with protecting women's rights judging by your stand on abortion. Am I wrong?

[CJ]

I think at this point a true conservative is completely unelectable.

Stevo

I don't agree with that at all, that's what the left wants you to believe. You just watched Romney (A GOP republican, not a conservative) lose his ass. The problem your theory has is you still have to keep your base. The idea we can cross the aisle and start adding liberal ideology to attract voters isn't going to work. Why vote for a half ass liberal when you can have the real deal?

[stevo]

I like Jindal but he hasn't convinced me he is a conservative. I know he is a republican, though.

I think at this point a true conservative is completely unelectable.

Stevo

[CJ]

I mentioned Bobby Jindel last round and this time as well, I'd hope he tries in 2016 but I doubt he wants to deal with the bullshit at a federal level as he is jumping through his own ass just trying to keep his state going.

Stevo

I like Jindal but he hasn't convinced me he is a conservative. I know he is a republican, though.

[stevo]

Marco Rubio is the only one of that list that has a chance.

I mentioned Bobby Jindel last round and this time as well, I'd hope he tries in 2016 but I doubt he wants to deal with the bullshit at a federal level as he is jumping through his own ass just trying to keep his state going.

Stevo

[CJ]

And the only reason he is, is because he will appeal to the minority.

That's one of the reasons, but mainly because he is a conservative. Chris Christie is an idiot, Huckabee is a crazy preacher, Jeb bush is a washed up amnesty proponent. Rand Paul comes in second.

[The King]

If you want to loose again pick Ryan as your candidate. Abortion and women's rights are VERY important as you just found out. He didn't come off well in the VP debate on those issues.

I'm not going to lose anything, as Ryan would not be "my" candidate. If he were chosen he would be chosen by consensus.

Abortion and women's rights are indeed VERY important, but are not the ONLY matter of importance regardless of what one-issue voters may think.

[stevo]

Ignorant? Yes and no, they just have different priorities than you do in reality. You would call them ignorant. They would call you other things.
Obviously there are more of them than there are ones like you.

Did you look at the popular vote numbers? I wouldn't call 2.3% too much more...

Stevo

[mstng86]

Marco Rubio is the only one of that list that has a chance.

And the only reason he is, is because he will appeal to the minority.