Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DeMarcus Ware released by Cowboys...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
    That's an ignorant bet. Ware will do better in Denver than he would have in Dallas. He has a MUCH better defense around him, which will make him look better than he is. Which is precisely why overpaying an aging, declining player would have been about as stupid as it gets. Like I said, you guys bitch all the time about Jerry overpaying players for past performance. And that's exactly what he would have done had he kept Ware.
    Generally i complain when Jerry overpays people who don't perform. Homo is a great example.

    My bet has nothing to do with Ware! Are you reading me right?
    Originally posted by racrguy
    What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
    Originally posted by racrguy
    Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
      Generally i complain when Jerry overpays people who don't perform. Homo is a great example.

      My bet has nothing to do with Ware! Are you reading me right?
      I read it as Ware gets 8 sacks, my bad. No way his replacement gets 8. Just like he wouldn't get 8 in Dallas either. Still a stupid bet.


      So you complain when Jerry overplays players who don't perform. Yet Ware can't perform, and you're ok with him overpaying that guy. Makes perfect sense.
      Originally posted by BradM
      But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
      Originally posted by Leah
      In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

      Comment


      • #78
        All the buzz at work. Not like they can get much worse without him really.

        Sent from my C6916 using Tapatalk
        Non tapatalk Sig so the butt hurt va-JJs can stop crying about not being able to turn it off.

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by bcoop View Post
          You really think Ware is worth $12,000,000+ this season? Seriously? You might need your head checked.


          It had to happen. You will criticize him all day long for overpaying players past their prime, but when he lets one go, he gets criticized for that, too? I'm not defending Jones here. If you love this team, this was a GOOD business decision.

          Apparently Denver does. 3 years, 30 million. 2014 guaranteed money, 13 million.


          Originally posted by blownaltered View Post
          That's fine but D Ware isn't going to get close to that money anywhere else. The cowboys tried to make a deal for a lower amount and he said no I guess. Lets see how much he gets paid elsewhere. I bet its not even close to 12m, more in the 3 to 4 range.

          Swing and a miss.


          Originally posted by jefehbk View Post
          Ware will sign some where for about 7-8million.

          Whoops.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by bcoop View Post
            I read it as Ware gets 8 sacks, my bad. No way his replacement gets 8. Just like he wouldn't get 8 in Dallas either. Still a stupid bet.


            So you complain when Jerry overplays players who don't perform. Yet Ware can't perform, and you're ok with him overpaying that guy. Makes perfect sense.
            Ware performed fine in every season if i use your own standards. You just told me his replacement won't even get 8 sacks.
            Originally posted by racrguy
            What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
            Originally posted by racrguy
            Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
              Ware performed fine in every season if i use your own standards. You just told me his replacement won't even get 8 sacks.
              By my own standards? I said he will perform better in Denver because he has a great defense around him. He doesn't have that here.

              19.5 to 11.5 to 6 is not "performing fine". It's a key indicator that he is on a sharp decline. I've got no doubt he can perform well enough in Denver. Because he doesn't have to carry the defense like he had to here. I still think Denver overpaid, and I have doubts Ware lives out that contract (injury).
              Originally posted by BradM
              But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
              Originally posted by Leah
              In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                By my own standards? I said he will perform better in Denver because he has a great defense around him. He doesn't have that here.

                19.5 to 11.5 to 6 is not "performing fine". It's a key indicator that he is on a sharp decline. I've got no doubt he can perform well enough in Denver. Because he doesn't have to carry the defense like he had to here. I still think Denver overpaid, and I have doubts Ware lives out that contract (injury).
                Or the 19.5 was an anomaly? At what point is he considered worth the price?

                Comment


                • #83
                  He overpaid all of those players that didn't deserve the money and then tried to short change the guy that deserved it the most.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    I guess the new guy Mincey is better than Ware? And the kid from Oregon (Beavers) Scott Crichton is someone that could come in and play.
                    Last edited by Rick Modena; 03-13-2014, 02:03 PM.
                    Originally posted by Silverback
                    Look all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                      He missed three games. Holy shit, now 11.5 sacks in a season is "bad". What are you guys smoking? Can I have some of that crack?

                      Ok ok ok...how about this, if Ware's replacement gets 8 or more sacks next season I will buy Brent a steak at Bob's. If he doesn't then Brent buys me a steak. No wine or any of that bullshit, before anyone gets wise, just a steak.
                      Ok I will put it this way and yes I only figured 13 games for 2013 season before you ask

                      2011 1.22 sacks per game
                      2012 0.72 sacks per game
                      2013 0.46 sacks per game

                      That looks like a decline to me

                      How about tackles

                      2011 3.63 per game
                      2012 3.50 per game
                      2013 3.08 per game

                      Again all stats for 2013 were figured for 13 games only.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                        Or the 19.5 was an anomaly? At what point is he considered worth the price?
                        I wouldn't call it an anomaly. Starting in 06, he went 8, 11.5, 14, 20, 11, 15.5, 19.5, 11.5, 6.
                        Originally posted by BradM
                        But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                        Originally posted by Leah
                        In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                          By my own standards? I said he will perform better in Denver because he has a great defense around him. He doesn't have that here.

                          19.5 to 11.5 to 6 is not "performing fine". It's a key indicator that he is on a sharp decline. I've got no doubt he can perform well enough in Denver. Because he doesn't have to carry the defense like he had to here. I still think Denver overpaid, and I have doubts Ware lives out that contract (injury).
                          You said that less than eight is what the new guy will get, so i am saying that 6 sacks over 13 games should be an acceptable performance by your own standards.

                          I'm willing to bet a steak that Jerry Jones makes this into a total shit show. Now is there anyone here who will strap on a pair and take jerry's side of the wager?
                          Originally posted by racrguy
                          What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                          Originally posted by racrguy
                          Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                            I wouldn't call it an anomaly. Starting in 06, he went 8, 11.5, 14, 20, 11, 15.5, 19.5, 11.5, 6.
                            I have no idea how you look at that data string and say he is in a definite decline. I mean for all we know the injury that sidelined him could have been nagging him all season.
                            Originally posted by racrguy
                            What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                            Originally posted by racrguy
                            Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by blownaltered View Post
                              Ok I will put it this way and yes I only figured 13 games for 2013 season before you ask

                              2011 1.22 sacks per game
                              2012 0.72 sacks per game
                              2013 0.46 sacks per game

                              That looks like a decline to me

                              How about tackles

                              2011 3.63 per game
                              2012 3.50 per game
                              2013 3.08 per game

                              Again all stats for 2013 were figured for 13 games only.
                              The Dallas defense was pretty easy to figure out, and has gotten easier each year. It's not a coincidence.

                              opposing coaches strategy: block 94


                              I'm not sure how a team that went to the Super Bowl last year thinks he is worth it, but JJ didn't. Actually, I am sure.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                I am just wondering how he turns in 11 sacks, a performance he has made twice before and all of a sudden it is a datapoint proving he is washed up. Maybe if there were two seasons with 6 sacks in that set of stats that would make sense.
                                Originally posted by racrguy
                                What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                                Originally posted by racrguy
                                Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X