That's an ignorant bet. Ware will do better in Denver than he would have in Dallas. He has a MUCH better defense around him, which will make him look better than he is. Which is precisely why overpaying an aging, declining player would have been about as stupid as it gets. Like I said, you guys bitch all the time about Jerry overpaying players for past performance. And that's exactly what he would have done had he kept Ware.
Generally i complain when Jerry overpays people who don't perform. Homo is a great example.
My bet has nothing to do with Ware! Are you reading me right?
Originally posted by racrguy
What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
Originally posted by racrguy
Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Generally i complain when Jerry overpays people who don't perform. Homo is a great example.
My bet has nothing to do with Ware! Are you reading me right?
I read it as Ware gets 8 sacks, my bad. No way his replacement gets 8. Just like he wouldn't get 8 in Dallas either. Still a stupid bet.
So you complain when Jerry overplays players who don't perform. Yet Ware can't perform, and you're ok with him overpaying that guy. Makes perfect sense.
Originally posted by BradM
But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
You really think Ware is worth $12,000,000+ this season? Seriously? You might need your head checked.
It had to happen. You will criticize him all day long for overpaying players past their prime, but when he lets one go, he gets criticized for that, too? I'm not defending Jones here. If you love this team, this was a GOOD business decision.
That's fine but D Ware isn't going to get close to that money anywhere else. The cowboys tried to make a deal for a lower amount and he said no I guess. Lets see how much he gets paid elsewhere. I bet its not even close to 12m, more in the 3 to 4 range.
I read it as Ware gets 8 sacks, my bad. No way his replacement gets 8. Just like he wouldn't get 8 in Dallas either. Still a stupid bet.
So you complain when Jerry overplays players who don't perform. Yet Ware can't perform, and you're ok with him overpaying that guy. Makes perfect sense.
Ware performed fine in every season if i use your own standards. You just told me his replacement won't even get 8 sacks.
Originally posted by racrguy
What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
Originally posted by racrguy
Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Ware performed fine in every season if i use your own standards. You just told me his replacement won't even get 8 sacks.
By my own standards? I said he will perform better in Denver because he has a great defense around him. He doesn't have that here.
19.5 to 11.5 to 6 is not "performing fine". It's a key indicator that he is on a sharp decline. I've got no doubt he can perform well enough in Denver. Because he doesn't have to carry the defense like he had to here. I still think Denver overpaid, and I have doubts Ware lives out that contract (injury).
Originally posted by BradM
But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
By my own standards? I said he will perform better in Denver because he has a great defense around him. He doesn't have that here.
19.5 to 11.5 to 6 is not "performing fine". It's a key indicator that he is on a sharp decline. I've got no doubt he can perform well enough in Denver. Because he doesn't have to carry the defense like he had to here. I still think Denver overpaid, and I have doubts Ware lives out that contract (injury).
Or the 19.5 was an anomaly? At what point is he considered worth the price?
Look all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
He missed three games. Holy shit, now 11.5 sacks in a season is "bad". What are you guys smoking? Can I have some of that crack?
Ok ok ok...how about this, if Ware's replacement gets 8 or more sacks next season I will buy Brent a steak at Bob's. If he doesn't then Brent buys me a steak. No wine or any of that bullshit, before anyone gets wise, just a steak.
Ok I will put it this way and yes I only figured 13 games for 2013 season before you ask
2011 1.22 sacks per game
2012 0.72 sacks per game
2013 0.46 sacks per game
That looks like a decline to me
How about tackles
2011 3.63 per game
2012 3.50 per game
2013 3.08 per game
Again all stats for 2013 were figured for 13 games only.
By my own standards? I said he will perform better in Denver because he has a great defense around him. He doesn't have that here.
19.5 to 11.5 to 6 is not "performing fine". It's a key indicator that he is on a sharp decline. I've got no doubt he can perform well enough in Denver. Because he doesn't have to carry the defense like he had to here. I still think Denver overpaid, and I have doubts Ware lives out that contract (injury).
You said that less than eight is what the new guy will get, so i am saying that 6 sacks over 13 games should be an acceptable performance by your own standards.
I'm willing to bet a steak that Jerry Jones makes this into a total shit show. Now is there anyone here who will strap on a pair and take jerry's side of the wager?
Originally posted by racrguy
What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
Originally posted by racrguy
Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
I wouldn't call it an anomaly. Starting in 06, he went 8, 11.5, 14, 20, 11, 15.5, 19.5, 11.5, 6.
I have no idea how you look at that data string and say he is in a definite decline. I mean for all we know the injury that sidelined him could have been nagging him all season.
Originally posted by racrguy
What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
Originally posted by racrguy
Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
I am just wondering how he turns in 11 sacks, a performance he has made twice before and all of a sudden it is a datapoint proving he is washed up. Maybe if there were two seasons with 6 sacks in that set of stats that would make sense.
Originally posted by racrguy
What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
Originally posted by racrguy
Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment