Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New engine for road race car ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by majorownage View Post
    Through a set of 4.10s
    SAE

    before/after sn95 cobra cams (degreed in)
    Not enough area under the torque curve....but decent.

    for example, my 2V starts making 300 ft-lbs at 2900 rpm, has 330 at 3500 rpm, peaks at 340 ft-lbs at 4400 rpm and tapers off to 300 at 5650rpm and pretty linear till 6500. It would destroy that 4V in similar weight cars. 4V cars just don't make good enough torque to justify the additional weight not to mention you have to spin the bejeesus out of them and stuff fails then. The new coyote motor makes great hp but it too lacks on the torque side. Torque is what you want for acceleration. Hp is just a number from a formula based on torque. In the real world operating rpm range, average torque is the number you pay attention to, not peak horsepower. So you look at cam timing and compression to increase cylinder pressure in an overlapping rpm range for each gear. Trans gearing becomes key too when you are looking for those tiny improvements on track.

    I'd post the scan but can only scan to PDF.....

    <---has weak computer skills.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by aggie97 View Post
      Not enough area under the torque curve....but decent.

      for example, my 2V starts making 300 ft-lbs at 2900 rpm, has 330 at 3500 rpm, peaks at 340 ft-lbs at 4400 rpm and tapers off to 300 at 5650rpm and pretty linear till 6500. It would destroy that 4V in similar weight cars. 4V cars just don't make good enough torque to justify the additional weight not to mention you have to spin the bejeesus out of them and stuff fails then. The new coyote motor makes great hp but it too lacks on the torque side. Torque is what you want for acceleration. Hp is just a number from a formula based on torque. In the real world operating rpm range, average torque is the number you pay attention to, not peak horsepower. So you look at cam timing and compression to increase cylinder pressure in an overlapping rpm range for each gear. Trans gearing becomes key too when you are looking for those tiny improvements on track.

      I'd post the scan but can only scan to PDF.....

      <---has weak computer skills.
      you can post a sub 20k pdf as an attachment in a post
      Interested in being a VIP member and donating to the site? Click here http://dfwmustangs.net/forums/payments.php

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Mach1 View Post
        you can post a sub 20k pdf as an attachment in a post
        scanner's smallest file is like 300k... I'm workin on it.

        Comment


        • #34
          1997 Explorer Long Block 302ci, GT40P Heads, AFM B21 Cam, Professional Products Upper/Lower intake and 70MM TB. Converted to MAF using A9l GUFB strategy, 03-04 Maf, TFS springs/retainers/pushrods, BBK LT Headers and Xpipe, Dyno Max welded muffs, UD pulleys, Polished/Coated 4.30 gears, Z-code T5

          Interested in being a VIP member and donating to the site? Click here http://dfwmustangs.net/forums/payments.php

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Mach1 View Post
            1997 Explorer Long Block 302ci, GT40P Heads, AFM B21 Cam, Professional Products Upper/Lower intake and 70MM TB. Converted to MAF using A9l GUFB strategy, 03-04 Maf, TFS springs/retainers/pushrods, BBK LT Headers and Xpipe, Dyno Max welded muffs, UD pulleys, Polished/Coated 4.30 gears, Z-code T5

            Damn pretty good numbers. I think I will put together something similar.
            07 GT500
            05 SRT10
            88 turbocoupe T-bird
            93 Cobra
            86 coupe
            Ducati 848

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by aggie97 View Post
              Not enough area under the torque curve....but decent.

              for example, my 2V starts making 300 ft-lbs at 2900 rpm, has 330 at 3500 rpm, peaks at 340 ft-lbs at 4400 rpm and tapers off to 300 at 5650rpm and pretty linear till 6500. It would destroy that 4V in similar weight cars. 4V cars just don't make good enough torque to justify the additional weight not to mention you have to spin the bejeesus out of them and stuff fails then. The new coyote motor makes great hp but it too lacks on the torque side. Torque is what you want for acceleration. Hp is just a number from a formula based on torque. In the real world operating rpm range, average torque is the number you pay attention to, not peak horsepower. So you look at cam timing and compression to increase cylinder pressure in an overlapping rpm range for each gear. Trans gearing becomes key too when you are looking for those tiny improvements on track.

              I'd post the scan but can only scan to PDF.....

              <---has weak computer skills.
              What is in that 2v?
              Full time ninja editor.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by majorownage View Post
                What is in that 2v?
                Probably pistons, cams, and stuff...
                07 GT500
                05 SRT10
                88 turbocoupe T-bird
                93 Cobra
                86 coupe
                Ducati 848

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by majorownage View Post
                  What is in that 2v?
                  pretty simple. big bore with dry sleeves, somewhere between 11.5 and 12:1 compression. HPP heads, CMS stage 2 cams and P51 intake. Nothing exotic and honestly over the last year looking at what some 2V guys are doing, I think this motor with the TFS heads and maybe a Stage 3 cam from MHS would put this thing solidly into the 375rwhp range. The problem is I want a lot more..........like 500rwhp.

                  Anyone need a badass 2V?!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X