I would say that an H/C/I coupe would beat a 2011 V6. Mikes car vs a 2011 V6, I think it's a drivers race. Since we are bench racing, I bet that Mikes coupe would have a tough time with my 92 T-bird, especially from a roll.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stock 2011 v6 vs h/c/I coupe.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JC316 View PostI would say that an H/C/I coupe would beat a 2011 V6. Mikes car vs a 2011 V6, I think it's a drivers race. Since we are bench racing, I bet that Mikes coupe would have a tough time with my 92 T-bird, especially from a roll.
Are those the ones with 3.8 s/c?
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostWell lets not keep it in the dark. What's done to it?
Are those the ones with 3.8 s/c?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostI've seen stock one with a pulley. It was running mid 9s at northstar.
The 3.27 gears should do good from a roll.
Traction is an issue from a dig, especially with the 3.27's. These cars are a bit different than a mustang, especially in the transmissions. The M5R2 has a stupidly short 1st gear, 3.75 ratio.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostGawd dammit JC, you just started a whole another bench racing arguement with him. lol. I hope you have your calculator handy to race him.
Muscle mustangs did a build on a supercoupe, stock motor with 180K miles on it. They went with a 73MM MAF, pulley, cone filter, and flowmaster exhaust. Got 230HP and 332ftlbs to the wheels, theirs looks like an automatic where mine is a 5 speed.
I have the same mods, but with magnaflow exhaust, .20 over pistons, shaved heads, and a 75MM throttle body. Haven't gotten around to a baseline pull yet, but I could easily see 240HP and 345 tq to the wheels, maybe more in the torque department.
So, I would put the edge to my t-bird in HP and TQ, it's the weight problem. Thunderchicken is a porker, figure close to 4K lbs with my 180lbs in it.
I bet it would be a close race, but it will never happen. See how much fun bench racing is?
Comment
-
4k? Sheesh didn't know they were that heavy.
With a roots the torque would be good, you'd have the upper hand there.
I'm sitting at 3060lb with me in it.
So 1000lbs, close hp and around 50 more lb ft.
Itd be a fun race until I ran out of gear and then you float passed me!
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
A mark 8 with all it's extras is around 3600-3700lbs.
I've ran a stock mark with 4.30 gears from a dig a roll, it wasn't close at all.
But you have tons more torque and longer gears to
Pull..
Are you local? We could run em.
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post4k? Sheesh didn't know they were that heavy.
With a roots the torque would be good, you'd have the upper hand there.
I'm sitting at 3060lb with me in it.
So 1000lbs, close hp and around 50 more lb ft.
Itd be a fun race until I ran out of gear and then you float passed me!
Yeah, they are heavy bastards, which is why I laugh at the people bitching about the Camaro and Challenger weighing 4Klbs and "only" making 400HP.
From what I am seeing, stock 5.0l's from that era dyno 200HP and 265ftlbs to the wheels. So, I might see 30HP and 50-60ftlbs on you. We probably equally suck at driving. Would definitely be interesting. Don't know about you running out of gear though, I have a shorter 5th gear than a T-5. Plus the 5.0L is making power into the 5K range on power, I am flat at 4500RPM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostA mark 8 with all it's extras is around 3600-3700lbs.
I've ran a stock mark with 4.30 gears from a dig a roll, it wasn't close at all.
But you have tons more torque and longer gears to
Pull..
Are you local? We could run em.
Comment
Comment