Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A fox vs 95

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Neither.

    Comment


    • #17
      I miss the feeling of my 88, the familiarity of it. But my 98 was a superior vehicle (minus the gutless engine) in nearly every way.

      Comment


      • #18
        Fox coupe, so fuck you.
        Originally posted by Buzzo
        Some dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.

        sigpic

        Comment


        • #19
          Fuck a sn95 and fuck its ecu....bro
          .....bro....

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Gasser64 View Post
            Do you know the weight difference between a 93 GT and a 95 GT? I had always assumed they gained weight but i never knew how much. Just like there was weight gain with the s197
            Depending on the combo, about 200-275lbs.

            Comment


            • #21
              My 95 with all the emissions stuff removed, tubular front end, some road race oriented suspension and sluminum heads weighted in at just under 3500 lbs.

              With that being said I loved my 95 much more then my previous fox bodies. I plan to pick up a white 95 cobra in the future. As mentioned with a competent tuner the t4mo ecm can work better then an a9l, a9p ect. My car always ran good even before a tune. Made 420 rwhp na on a stock ecm.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Andy@PrimeTuning View Post
                Don't worry about the bad stuff you hear about the sn95 computer.

                It works just fine with a competent tuner.
                Need to come back to this post. This is something I have heard a lot about. Everybody complaining.

                But over on the corral i searched and seen some interesting things. Some people just running ported GT40 heads and making decent power, yet they never tuned the car. At what point do you really need to tune the car?
                WH

                Comment


                • #23
                  custom tuning will benefit ANY vehicle

                  the cost:benefit ratio isn't always there, but the performance, drivability, and fuel mileage are
                  http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Gasser64 View Post
                    Need to come back to this post. This is something I have heard a lot about. Everybody complaining.

                    But over on the corral i searched and seen some interesting things. Some people just running ported GT40 heads and making decent power, yet they never tuned the car. At what point do you really need to tune the car?
                    Cam swaps. SN95 cars hate cam swaps without a tune.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Cooter View Post
                      custom tuning will benefit ANY vehicle

                      the cost:benefit ratio isn't always there, but the performance, drivability, and fuel mileage are
                      Originally posted by thesource View Post
                      Cam swaps. SN95 cars hate cam swaps without a tune.
                      So you should get a tune even if all you did was a head swap. And intake
                      WH

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        if it were my car? yes, I would get it tuned... but I wouldn't stop at heads and intake... I would do a cam also.

                        but yes, I am of the mind that $50-500 is worth every penny to have your combo dialed in correctly. I cut my teeth on carb'd cars, then moved to mechanical diesels... So I always dialed in my own combos. I'm now on to computerized diesels, but every one of them is custom tuned. It just seems a waste to spend a bunch of money on parts and not optimize them
                        http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Cooter View Post
                          custom tuning will benefit ANY vehicle

                          the cost:benefit ratio isn't always there, but the performance, drivability, and fuel mileage are
                          The tune I had on my 2004 GT wasn't a dyno tune, but it was a custom tune (via email) with tweaks based on datalogging and dyno data. Based on that, I tend to agree with you. I didn't even remember how much of a difference it was until I was getting ready to sell it and put the factory tune back on it.

                          I never exceeded 250 rwhp with the bolt ons but still ran 8.5x 1/8 and 13.5x in the 1/4 at full weight and with my fat ass, so I can't complain.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Thinking I would like a fox instead of my 95. May post it for sale.....


                            2003 f250
                            1990 mustang gt stock 68k miles
                            1990 mustang gt 347 t56
                            1994 peterbilt 377 dump truck 450hp cat
                            1997 freightliner 500hp detriot[/FONT]

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Foxes are where its at. I parked my 2011 5.0. Been daily driving a triple black 91 5.0

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Andy@PrimeTuning View Post
                                Don't worry about the bad stuff you hear about the sn95 computer.

                                It works just fine with a competent tuner.
                                Boom bitch

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X