Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

front suspension travel question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • front suspension travel question

    I'm only getting about 3/4" of travel in my front suspension. If I measure, then jack the car up and let the suspension hang i'm measuring just over 3/4" travel. That just doesn't seem right. Car has AJE K member, stock A arms (not binding) strange adjustable struts, and strange coil over kit. Also has SN95 spindles. Also look at how high the strut is coming out of the caster camber plate, should I try and put a spacer on the bottom to get more length underneath the plate? I could lower the front end some to get the travel but that is going to throw off the front/rear balance and its already raking down in the front as it is.



    weight on suspension:


    no weight on suspension:


    setup:

  • #2
    What are the specs on the springs ?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by HECDOGGIE View Post
      What are the specs on the springs ?
      14-175 i *think*. What do the spring specs matter if the strut isn't extending far enough? I wonder if I could have the wrong strut.

      Comment


      • #4
        That's possible. Are you running a front sway bar?

        Disconnect the tie rod and sway bar if you have one and restest.
        "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

        Comment


        • #5
          Needs spacers

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Baron View Post
            That's possible. Are you running a front sway bar?

            Disconnect the tie rod and sway bar if you have one and restest.
            I don't have a sway bar. If I remove the nut on top of the strut that holds it to the caster plate the whole a arm / spindle / strut etc drops to the floor and the a arm swings through its entire range.

            It looks like the 94-2004 struts have a longer reach. I have a fox body car but 94 spindles. Maybe I need the 94s... ugh.

            This chart shows the base length, then extended length. the 94's would get me an extra 1.4" at ride height.
            S6001EM 13.0” 19.3" (79-93 cars)
            S6005LM 14.4” 20.7" (94-04 cars)
            S6009LM 15.8” 22.2"
            S6011LM 15.8” 22.2"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by FOKAI View Post
              Needs spacers
              Thats what I'm thinking. I'm gonna cut some up on the lathe real quick before trying the 94 struts

              Comment


              • #8
                Well your problem is the car is 4x4 already

                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                Comment


                • #9
                  As said already.. you need spacers
                  Doug

                  90 LX Coupe 5.0
                  90 7up Vert. 5.0

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                    Well your problem is the car is 4x4 already
                    Not everyone can have that mid 90's garland stance your ride has j/k

                    I'd lower it some but remember when brooks was showing you how that hatchback he had launched and the ass dipped down? I'm trying to get my car to do that and if I lower it at this point I'm afraid its gonna dip down too far.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by BlueCoupeRedVert View Post
                      As said already.. you need spacers
                      I've cut some 1.5" spacers for the bottom. I can get it to extend down to about the 5 1/4" mark now. I haven't put it together with the spring but its definitely extending further than it was

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Blue88Coupe View Post
                        Not everyone can have that mid 90's garland stance your ride has j/k

                        I'd lower it some but remember when brooks was showing you how that hatchback he had launched and the ass dipped down? I'm trying to get my car to do that and if I lower it at this point I'm afraid its gonna dip down too far.
                        I feel ya. I need to bring mine back up.

                        320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                        DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Spacers is definitely the right solution. Going to 94-04 struts you would actually lose a lot of bump travel compared to the Fox struts and could bottom out the strut depending on your ride height.
                          Atlantic Blue '00 - '03 Cobra motor and TKO600, solid axle, full MM suspension
                          Silver '01 Vette - D1 blown LS

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X