Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

E85 on a n/a foxbody?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by majorownage View Post
    lol, this n!66@....

    Most of the power gains in e85 come from the fact that more fuel can be burnt per molar unit of oxygen. Even though e85 has less energy per mass of fuel, the fact that more can be injected into the combustion chamber more than makes up for this.
    It isn't because E85 is more resistant to detonation and allows you to run higher cylinder pressures (dome pistons, forced induction, nitrous), which more than make up for the fact that it has less energy density than regular unleaded?
    Originally posted by Broncojohnny
    HOORAY ME and FUCK YOU!

    Comment


    • #32
      i dont care about all this science mumbo jumbo, but can it not be argued that when properly set up, e85 outweighs 93 octane, every time?

      i also agree on a daily driver no way, but for a weekend car with the proper fuel system, e85 will out run 93 oct. and the price of fuel is the main advantage.

      i wouldn't do it on your fox mike, but if you get a daily and leave the fox for fun, then put it on e85, throw some power adder at it, and let it eat.

      as i always say, if you want real answers and not just a couple random half ass answers, aski this shit on yellowbullet.com
      THE BAD HOMBRE

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by TeeShock View Post
        Protip: you're dead wrong

        Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
        Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
        You've already said yourself how nitromethane works: it is an oxidizer, releasing free oxygen into the combustion chamber more efficiently than it can be ingested from the atmosphere.

        E85 doesn't do that. Your statement that horsepower gains are from the same mechanism is not true.
        Originally posted by Nash B. View Post
        It isn't because E85 is more resistant to detonation and allows you to run higher cylinder pressures (dome pistons, forced induction, nitrous), which more than make up for the fact that it has less energy density than regular unleaded?
        Ya'll are fumbling the ball seriously. First of all, you cannot draw a comparison between fuels by varying the engine specifications. Of course with a higher octane rating will allow higher compression. Any shade tree redneck knows this.

        I am trying to compare fuel types ALONE. Try running all different types in one motor independently.

        Why do people pick up power from switching from race gas to ethanol/methanol? It's not because of more timing. Race gas allows the spark to be advanced until the engine maximizes it's power. Spark advance will increase power to a point, but once that point is reached, there is no reason to add anymore. Yea, it won't knock if more is added, but neither will it add power.

        There are always gains from switching from gasoline to alcohol specifically because of the decreased requirement in amount of oxidizer per molecule of fuel. Additionally, ethanol DOES have it's own oxidizer: "OH," which makes ethanol an alcohol.
        Last edited by majorownage; 11-12-2013, 05:06 PM.
        Full time ninja editor.

        Comment


        • #34
          In the dirt track world methonal and gas they have similar horse power numbers but methonal makes more torque.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Super Coupe View Post
            In the dirt track world methonal and gas they have similar horse power numbers but methonal makes more torque.
            Probably from the reduced temps that they run at. Would be my guess.

            320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

            DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
              Probably from the reduced temps that they run at. Would be my guess.
              probably regulations
              Full time ninja editor.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                Probably from the reduced temps that they run at. Would be my guess.
                additional timing.
                "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

                Comment


                • #38
                  holy shit, the internet and the free information avialiable conveyed, are worth exactly what you pay for that information, in here.

                  ps, i'm on an engine dyno 3 days per week. E85 is still garbage.....methanol is bad enough to keep away from moisture.
                  pinto gt with wood trim

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Super Coupe View Post
                    In the dirt track world methonal and gas they have similar horse power numbers but methonal makes more torque.
                    wrong, hp is not measureable, it is figured from torque which is the only type of power that can be measured. so to say an engine makes more torque and the same power is completely ignorant.
                    pinto gt with wood trim

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Grape View Post
                      wrong, hp is not measureable, it is figured from torque which is the only type of power that can be measured. so to say an engine makes more torque and the same power is completely ignorant.
                      Well they could could produce their peak torque at the same calculated rate.

                      320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                      DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Grape View Post
                        wrong, hp is not measureable, it is figured from torque which is the only type of power that can be measured. so to say an engine makes more torque and the same power is completely ignorant.
                        It makes similar I didn't the exact same Einstein. All my information I have heard comes from Dennis wells and I'm pretty sure he's dynod an engine or two.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by majorownage View Post
                          probably regulations
                          A lot of people who run gas in dirt track so it for the rear percentage. In a long race you burn a lot more methonal than gas.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            stupid is as stupid does.
                            pinto gt with wood trim

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Grape View Post
                              stupid is as stupid does.
                              I may not be a smart man, but I know what love is.

                              320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                              DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X