I'm pretty sure you'll never see one actually sell for 8-10K in your lifetime, no matter what original condition.
A 13K mile one sold on Ebay for $10.5K, a 50K mile one sold for $6500. I have no illusions that mine is worth that, but the values are going up on these cars. NADA classics shows $4400 in average shape and since the values are all over the place I'm probably going to start in the 4K range on mine, see if I get any bites.
A 13K mile one sold on Ebay for $10.5K, a 50K mile one sold for $6500. I have no illusions that mine is worth that, but the values are going up on these cars. NADA classics shows $4400 in average shape and since the values are all over the place I'm probably going to start in the 4K range on mine, see if I get any bites.
Speaking of TurboCoupes, Denny went with me to Fort Worth to pick up a FREE light blue '85 TurboCoupe that the dude was going to lose. I drove it home, then a few days later my "SVO" had a little engine fire and I had to use some of the wiring harness on the TC to fix it.
OP - Everyone that has owned and driven a 2.3T has at least one story like these!
What is so unreliable about them? It appears to be a very simple engine. Aside from the timing belt, I don't see much that would break.
Everything falls apart on them. I mean everything. When they run right for ten minutes and you're pushing over 20 pounds of boost they are fun as shit though.
Again, I'm not seeing much. I define the Ford Contour as an unreliable piece of shit. The head gasket will blow, the wiring harness crumbles, the transmission is shit, the cooling fans short out, etc.
Everything falls apart on them. I mean everything. When they run right for ten minutes and you're pushing over 20 pounds of boost they are fun as shit though.
I still don't get why. The 2.3L rangers are know for being reliable. The ignition items are known problems, TFI is a problem on all Fords, I have heard of them throwing the timing belt. All of these seem like easy fixes.
well, the water lines to cool (except they really dont) the turbo tend to spring leaks, the wiring harness needs a few more grounds to work properly, the ignition is finicky and like to give fits under boost, the turbos are great until you crank up the boost, clutches dont really hold that great...
"If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
well, the water lines to cool (except they really dont) the turbo tend to spring leaks, the wiring harness needs a few more grounds to work properly, the ignition is finicky and like to give fits under boost, the turbos are great until you crank up the boost, clutches dont really hold that great...
Sounds like typical high performance crap on a car that's not high performance in nature. The clutch in this thing is beastly on the pedal effort. I'm not sure what kind of clutch it is, but it makes my Cobra's clutch seem soft.
I got everything together today and took it for a drive. The powerband reminds me very much of a subaru WRX. It's a slug until the turbo kicks in, then it's a slug going down a steep slope.
Oil lines to the turbo are prone to breakage, head gaskets blow, valves chip, pistons melt, most have 7.5 rear ends instead of 8.8s, T5s aren't up to handling power and have smaller input shafts, the electrical is a fire hazard and prone to be finicky at best, went through about 6 alternators on mine, but that may have just been due to AZ garbage before I knew better, heads crack easily injectors aren't really big enough if you up the power at all, some of them had 2 fuel pump systems instead of just 1, which meant you were twice as likely to starve the engine for fuel, blow the turbo, then clog up your brand new converter with oil.... Did I miss anything guys?
Comment