Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How to decide on which valve spring

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Mach1 View Post
    Good choice
    Thanks for all of your help, if I knew of a place I could go and sit in a class and listen to someone talk about racing engine dynamics, I would.

    320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

    DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
      Thanks for all of your help, if I knew of a place I could go and sit in a class and listen to someone talk about racing engine dynamics, I would.
      you and me both
      Interested in being a VIP member and donating to the site? Click here http://dfwmustangs.net/forums/payments.php

      Comment


      • #33
        stock lifters will not control k800s, ive experienced that one...they were new lifters at that. kmotion makes a great spring
        Ring and pinion specialist

        Comment


        • #34
          I guess it depends on the spring setup

          Originally posted by greenbullitt View Post
          stock lifters will not control k800s, ive experienced that one...they were new lifters at that. kmotion makes a great spring
          There all I have run for the last 8 years with stock used lifters and tfs/r heads on 4 different motors, 4 different cams, all under .600 --- AMS-B4 Crane 2031 and another Crane cam that was rated to 7200 and the one I run now that was a turbo cam lunati 55112
          Last edited by jyro; 08-29-2013, 06:01 PM.
          Don't worry about what you can't change.
          Do the best you can with what you have.
          Be honest, even if it hurts.

          "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

          Comment


          • #35
            All this looking and deciding has got me looking at shp short blocks.

            I wonder if they'd build me a 4.125 bore with the 3 inch stroke, 5.3 liter.

            Would reduced piston speed make it stronger, or just last longer? It would see more rpm to get desired power. A 363 may be the better option though.

            320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

            DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
              All this looking and deciding has got me looking at shp short blocks.

              I wonder if they'd build me a 4.125 bore with the 3 inch stroke, 5.3 liter.

              Would reduced piston speed make it stronger, or just last longer? It would see more rpm to get desired power. A 363 may be the better option though.
              are you really serious with the 4.125 bore and 3" stroke? come on now... why do you always try to swim upriver? i love that you are all about fox body but damn. listen to some of the guys on here.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by broke again View Post
                are you really serious with the 4.125 bore and 3" stroke? come on now... why do you always try to swim upriver? i love that you are all about fox body but damn. listen to some of the guys on here.
                Because the new copo lsx 5.3 is a 4.125 x 3 with a blower on it.

                Why not do it with a ford motor?

                Listen to them, I am listening! I'm discussing ideas..

                Edit: and I was referring to piston speed when I was asking if a shorter stroke would be stronger.
                Last edited by 91CoupeMike; 08-29-2013, 09:30 PM.

                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by jyro View Post
                  There all I have run for the last 8 years with stock used lifters and tfs/r heads on 4 different motors, 4 different cams, all under .600 --- AMS-B4 Crane 2031 and another Crane cam that was rated to 7200 and the one I run now that was a turbo cam lunati 55112
                  interesting, I had them on a set of new motorsports and they didn't control for shit, very noisy.
                  Ring and pinion specialist

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                    Because the new copo lsx 5.3 is a 4.125 x 3 with a blower on it.

                    Why not do it with a ford motor?

                    Listen to them, I am listening! I'm discussing ideas..

                    Edit: and I was referring to piston speed when I was asking if a shorter stroke would be stronger.
                    well there is your answer. put a copo 5.3 with a blower in it. if not dont even make the comparision between the two builds.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      My setup

                      Originally posted by greenbullitt View Post
                      interesting, I had them on a set of new motorsports and they didn't control for shit, very noisy.
                      I left it to David at Wells to set these k800 springs up on my heads, we ended up with 140 or so at the seat. My valves are .1 or .2 longer than the stock tfs valves so I'm sure it gave the option of spring height setup. I always adjust my hyd roller with near zero preload. As close to loose as possible without actually being loose and clicking. If I adjust it running, as soon as it stops clicking, I stop, no 1/4 turn or whatever extra.
                      Don't worry about what you can't change.
                      Do the best you can with what you have.
                      Be honest, even if it hurts.

                      "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by broke again View Post
                        well there is your answer. put a copo 5.3 with a blower in it. if not dont even make the comparision between the two builds.
                        Sigh. I was asking a question about piston speed.

                        Second time I've stated this.

                        320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                        DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          all the ford sbf options are hi-dollar

                          Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                          Because the new copo lsx 5.3 is a 4.125 x 3 with a blower on it. Why not do it with a ford motor? Edit: and I was referring to piston speed when I was asking if a shorter stroke would be stronger.
                          If you have a unlimited budget, By all means get one of these


                          it's out of my price range

                          or this http://dallas.craigslist.org/dal/pts/4037336102.html
                          Last edited by jyro; 08-31-2013, 10:47 AM.
                          Don't worry about what you can't change.
                          Do the best you can with what you have.
                          Be honest, even if it hurts.

                          "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            as for your piston speed, buy this software and you can build any engine combo and see the differences.
                            Don't worry about what you can't change.
                            Do the best you can with what you have.
                            Be honest, even if it hurts.

                            "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              piston speed conversation

                              Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                              Sigh. I was asking a question about piston speed.

                              Second time I've stated this.
                              Advanced Engineering Tech - Piston speed, Displacment vs HP? - What would be the piston speed for 346cid (3.9 Bore x 3.622 Stroke) ,360cid (4 Bore x 3.622 Crank), 383cid (3.9 Bore x 4.0 Crank), 392cid (4.0 Bore x 3.9 Crank), 402cid (4.0 Bore x 4.0 Crank), 408cid (4.030 Bore x 4.0 Crank), 427cid (4.125 Bore x 4.00...
                              Don't worry about what you can't change.
                              Do the best you can with what you have.
                              Be honest, even if it hurts.

                              "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I want an shp 4.125 8.2 deck. Any reason for going tall deck besides cubes?

                                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X