Personally, I've never been a fan of 4 lug. They just look right when 5 luged. Besides that, yes, cheaper/better/bigger brakes are offered when 5 lug IMO.
'93 Cobra-Coyote Powered
'13 Dodge Cummins
'14 Rubicon X
As it's already been said better brake options. The biggest thing to me is having to look at the tiny front rotor and nasty ass drum on the back through the rims. It's not that bad with stock ponys but once you put 5 stars on there you can really see the difference.
I'm converting to a 5 lug cobra setup and I've been doing a ton of research over the past month so if you need some help let me know.
Also, if you're looking at the 4 lug 03/04 cobras. Note that they are 17x9. Which is great for the rear but it sucks in the front IMO. Requires fender rolling and drop spindles to be low and keep your turning radius. 9 inches is to wide for a foxbody unless you're stock height and have no plans of going lower. That's with a 245/45/17. The inside of the wheel rubs the control arm, maybe tubular arms solve this.
And drop spindles are $$. But it's the best way to do it.
A 17x7 or maybe even 8 would be best with a 245/45/17.
Only if you use the 96+ spindle. The 94/95 will keep stock width.
Only if he goes rear disk, you can still use rear drums, ranger parts.
The 94/95 spindles still increase the track width, just not as much as the 96-04 spindles do. But the 94/95 spindles are the only way to keep bumpsteer in an acceptable range with the stock K member. Maximum motorsports has a great write up detailing the differences.
Originally posted by stevo
Not a good idea to go Tim 'The Toolman' Taylor on the power phallus.
Comment