Classic Mustang guys

[dee]

I might have stumbled into a 66 fastback. I know of a few places to source parts but was wanting to hear some peoples preferences in that department.

[mustang1200]

Would you like to sell it?

[dee]

Not really.

[dcs13]

good first gen mustang sit: mustangsteve.com

[Z06killinsbf]

If you like strongly opinionated responses on how it should remain original, go to vintage-mustang.com. BEWARE: most of the guys there are stuck on 20-30+ year old information so some things they say is out dated but it's an excellent source for original information.

Stang Aholics is a good source for modify parts I'm told.

[dee]

It won't be original as i want a good driver so I'm thinking 351/408 with a c4 or tremec, upgrade to disc brakes and most likely power steering as well. Will most likely build an 8.8 for the rear since it will be a bit cheaper than finding a 9" since I'm pretty sure most of these cars came with 8" differentials.

[Baron Von Crowder]

I cant stand any of the classic mustang forums. It's almost as though there is a bible to building a classic mustang, and anything outside of that is blasphemous.

Ive bought from CJ pony parts, Sacramento mustang, Dallas mustang, Ebay, etc. Mustang Steve is a nice guy, and local in DFW. Some of his info and mods are really cool, and some not so thought out.

[Z06killinsbf]

An explorer 8.8 will fit (stock length) if you use like Bullitts or something like that. You'll need a 1" spacer on the front though. If you're looking at fitting something bigger than a 245 under the back you need to check out my build: http://www.pro-touring.com/showthrea...in-on-a-budget

[46Tbird]

Most of the 'restomod' '64-66 cars I've seen look like fucked-over, reheated ASS since they are pretty small cars to begin with and have really small wheel openings. Trying to shove a Windsor, or mod-motor, or something other really trendy ends up making a big mess since the engine bay and steering/suspension have to be cut out and thrown away to fit them. Then fitting something as small as a 17x7 wheel up front is a bunch of work. I'm a little concerned with the casual, "I'm thinking 351/408 with a C4 or Tremec, disc brakes, power steering, and 8.8" because you're basically talking about building the car from scratch. Hope you are prepared for the months/years of work involved in all that.

I'm not trying to talk you out of it, just realize that you're talking about a TON of work and money to make what I think you're envisioning. There's a reason those old Mustangs are built according to a 'bible' and it's because if you want an enjoyable car that's not a complete headache you do it that way. lol

All I can tell you is, if you want to put a big engine in it and fit big brakes and wheels to it, DO YOUR RESEARCH. Or consider a more simple build. Those early cars are pretty sweet when done mild and tasteful.

[Vertnut]

I was into the early cars years ago, but man, it got expensive. Keep in mind you're dealing with a Falcon with a prettier skin on it. They are very easy to work on (simple) but as Danny said, if you start to do mods, it can be quite a long, expensive project.

[dee]

The idea behind the Windsor is to get decent power and not have to sacrifice idle/drivability(sp?). The brakes don't have to be big just want something a bit better than 66 era stopping power. Fab work isn't too scary as I have a well equipped metal shop I can use.

[Blue88Coupe]

Most of the 'restomod' '64-66 cars I've seen look like fucked-over, reheated ASS since they are pretty small cars to begin with and have really small wheel openings. Trying to shove a Windsor, or mod-motor, or something other really trendy ends up making a big mess since the engine bay and steering/suspension have to be cut out and thrown away to fit them. Then fitting something as small as a 17x7 wheel up front is a bunch of work. I'm a little concerned with the casual, "I'm thinking 351/408 with a C4 or Tremec, disc brakes, power steering, and 8.8" because you're basically talking about building the car from scratch. Hope you are prepared for the months/years of work involved in all that.

I'm not trying to talk you out of it, just realize that you're talking about a TON of work and money to make what I think you're envisioning. There's a reason those old Mustangs are built according to a 'bible' and it's because if you want an enjoyable car that's not a complete headache you do it that way. lol

All I can tell you is, if you want to put a big engine in it and fit big brakes and wheels to it, DO YOUR RESEARCH. Or consider a more simple build. Those early cars are pretty sweet when done mild and tasteful.

I like your thinking here.

The links I like to follow are what the trans am series cars did back in the late 60's early 70's. They have vintage racing classes that have guides you can follow. Theres good info on how they setup their brakes using the old stock stuff and still make it work/be competitive.

http://shelbytransam.com/walt/ShelbyTA/index.htm

scroll down to their documents section...

http://bvintagefordracing.runboard.com/f12

lots of parts here:

http://www.cobraautomotive.com/

I have a 70 model im building and my dad has a 66 he's working on. We're both going through swapping brakes out for disk/5 lug using all the old parts that the vintage racers are using

[Vertnut]

I like your thinking here.

The links I like to follow are what the trans am series cars did back in the late 60's early 70's. They have vintage racing classes that have guides you can follow. Theres good info on how they setup their brakes using the old stock stuff and still make it work/be competitive.

http://shelbytransam.com/walt/ShelbyTA/index.htm

scroll down to their documents section...

http://bvintagefordracing.runboard.com/f12

lots of parts here:

http://www.cobraautomotive.com/

I have a 70 model im building and my dad has a 66 he's working on. We're both going through swapping brakes out for disk/5 lug using all the old parts that the vintage racers are using

I prefer the '70 model for drivetrain/brake/suspension options.

[mustang1200]

I haven't begun my 65 fastback project yet because of some of the things listed above. I in fact want to build the car from the ground up while leaving the exterior and interior mostly stock appearing.

Edit: I really want to get started, but mine is a rusty mess that I feel needs to be completely stripped and blasted before any rust repair/replacement can begin.

[Baron Von Crowder]

Most of the 'restomod' '64-66 cars I've seen look like fucked-over, reheated ASS since they are pretty small cars to begin with and have really small wheel openings. Trying to shove a Windsor, or mod-motor, or something other really trendy ends up making a big mess since the engine bay and steering/suspension have to be cut out and thrown away to fit them. Then fitting something as small as a 17x7 wheel up front is a bunch of work. I'm a little concerned with the casual, "I'm thinking 351/408 with a C4 or Tremec, disc brakes, power steering, and 8.8" because you're basically talking about building the car from scratch. Hope you are prepared for the months/years of work involved in all that.

I'm not trying to talk you out of it, just realize that you're talking about a TON of work and money to make what I think you're envisioning. There's a reason those old Mustangs are built according to a 'bible' and it's because if you want an enjoyable car that's not a complete headache you do it that way. lol

All I can tell you is, if you want to put a big engine in it and fit big brakes and wheels to it, DO YOUR RESEARCH. Or consider a more simple build. Those early cars are pretty sweet when done mild and tasteful.

I have 13" cobra disks on the back, 11.65" cobra vented disks on the rear, a mustang 8.8, T3550 and a 302, and it was all pretty close to bolt up. There's very little actual "fab" that was done, aside from taking brackets off the 8.8 and welding perches on.

Danny, you're one of THEM!!