Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Picked up a short block and 347 parts.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
    Well, I thought it was clear it was separate.

    Would that require a special machine shop? Or can I go to the local planned parenthood and ask to borrow the ultra sound?
    A competent machine shop should be able to check straightness and magnaflux the parts for cracks.

    Comment


    • #17
      just use a old kenwood speaker magnet

      Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
      Well, I thought it was clear it was separate.

      Would that require a special machine shop? Or can I go to the local planned parenthood and ask to borrow the ultra sound?
      and the metal fillings out of an old etch-a-sketch, after all, you only have to check 6
      Don't worry about what you can't change.
      Do the best you can with what you have.
      Be honest, even if it hurts.

      "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by racrguy View Post
        You'll have to call the manufacturer, a lot of places sell singles but it's not something they advertise. When you're looking through a catalog and see the weights of things it's an average and all the components are within a tolerance of that number. Good performance rods are matched to be as close as they can be from the factory. You need to pull at least a couple of rod/pistons apart and weight the ends and call probe and see if they can get you a couple that can complete the set, the same with pistons. If I were you I'd have the rods, pistons and crank checked for cracks, when you see a set of rods and pistons that are short it can be an indication that the engine was blowed the fuck up.
        Solid advice.

        Comment


        • #19
          How much difference in power would a 4.125 piston have over a 4.040?

          Idea is to have a single turbo set up

          320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

          DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
            How much difference in power would a 4.125 piston have over a 4.040?

            Idea is to have a single turbo set up
            Why did you but 6 X 4.040 pistons if you want to build a dart block with 4.125 bore? Are you going to coat the 4.040 pistons in JB Weld to make up the difference in size?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by cool cat View Post
              Why did you but 6 X 4.040 pistons if you want to build a dart block with 4.125 bore? Are you going to coat the 4.040 pistons in JB Weld to make up the difference in size?
              hahahahahahaha

              Mike, the difference in power really matters in the heads. if the heads are unshrouded on the 4.04 bore, then the power difference from going from a 349 to a 363 is maybe 10-15 rw (all things being equal picking up 14 CID)... or maybe half to a pound of boost drop in turbo pressure.

              it isnt really worth worrying about unless you have some huge ass valves in the heads that are shrouded in the 4.04 bore and not in the 4.125 bore... if thats the case, then Id suspect you could pick up 30+ rw or so. Bigger bore is always better, but it isnt truely necessary if the heads don't require it. The larger bore just helps the better, larger-valved heads do work. At least that is how it was explained to be my Keith Craft.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by cool cat View Post
                Why did you but 6 X 4.040 pistons if you want to build a dart block with 4.125 bore? Are you going to coat the 4.040 pistons in JB Weld to make up the difference in size?
                Bought a stock short block and the guy threw these in extra because he didn't want them, bought a crate engine instead. I spent 100 on everything.

                I was debating using the 4.04 instead for the sake of costs. I'll be getting bigger heads at some point. It's all speculation right now.

                320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                Comment


                • #23


                  Here is one:

                  320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                  DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View Post
                    Bought a stock short block and the guy threw these in extra because he didn't want them, bought a crate engine instead. I spent 100 on everything.

                    I was debating using the 4.04 instead for the sake of costs. I'll be getting bigger heads at some point. It's all speculation right now.
                    Oh gotch ya. Stick with the 4.04 for now. For shits n giggles google "Joe Sherman 347", you can see some interesting builds with stock blocks as well as Dart block builds.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by cool cat View Post
                      Oh gotch ya. Stick with the 4.04 for now. For shits n giggles google "Joe Sherman 347", you can see some interesting builds with stock blocks as well as Dart block builds.
                      I just looked at them. Fuck! 771hp and 8800rpm out of a 357

                      320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                      DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        those pistons look to have a decent dish to them, if the 6 are in useable shape, and the compression ration works with the dish, save the coin and run em.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by shumpertdavid View Post
                          those pistons look to have a decent dish to them, if the 6 are in useable shape, and the compression ration works with the dish, save the coin and run em.
                          The dish is 13.8cc. Not terrible but certainly not the best for n/a.

                          320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

                          DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Depends on combustion chamber cc's. My new regal pistons have a 14 cc dish, they will yield me a 10:1 compression ratio with the headgasket thickness I have and the factory 46cc combustion chambers. I'd guess yours and a 62cc chamber would still make fair n/a compression ratio

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Shit compression makes the turbo spool quicker...mines 11.1 lol
                              81 LX
                              82 GT

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Stroker motors are overrated.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X