Originally posted by aggie97
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Coyote Flow numbers?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by aggie97 View PostI'd like to see you attempt to lift a coyote valve to .600" lift. You would need massive piston notches to even get close and you better understand valve event timing with the VVT screwing with you all the time.
My goals are mostly bolt ones and cams in search of 480+.... hopefully 500 for fun.
In my 2950# race ready with driver car....it should be a hoot on track and probably the craziest thing around short of a trans am or GT1 car. Will be learning all I can about the new motor over the next few weeks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostSo define impressive then.
I would say enough airflow to achieve 450rw with untouched heads and cams at 300ci qualifies, but I'm all ears to hear what you think.
For aftermarket heads its an entirely different ball game.
The real problem is that you seem to think that I'm degrading the Coyote as a whole, all I said is that I wasn't impressed with the flow numbers. In all fairness I don't know the intake port volume and if they were tiny I might be very impressed. But the thing is the engine is extremely efficient (100% VE at some points apparently) and that is impressive.
Now stop huggin coyote nuts
Edit: These are moderately impressive numbers, using factory BBF port locations but are aftermarket
intakes;
.100=67, .200=148, .300=241, .400=326, .500=387, .600=419, .700=422, .750=419, .800=418, .850=423 cfm.
exhausts; without a test pipe.
.100=52, .200=106, .300=150, .400=192, .500=228, .600=252, .700=263, .750=265, .800=266 cfm.Last edited by Torinoman; 11-27-2012, 08:10 PM.1971 Ford Torino - Time to go bigger and better.
2011 F150 Limited - Stock with a 6.2
Comment
-
Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostSo define impressive then.
I would say enough airflow to achieve 450rw with untouched heads and cams at 300ci qualifies, but I'm all ears to hear what you think.
Wait, ford doesn't put them in anything else so I guess its not going to take off like the LS series motors. Bad call on Ford's part. I would make it the standard engine in the whole ford lineup. But that's me.
Great motor, 900hp is within reach for these motors with stock heads and a power adder. However when we start to knock on 1200hp mark you want more flow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sickwindsor View PostI suppose that is the flaw in your argument. You think current RWHP numbers have anything to do with what I am addressing. I wan't to take a peak into the future and see what these things will make a couple years down the line when the motors are cheaper and can be found in junkyards.
Wait, ford doesn't put them in anything else so I guess its not going to take off like the LS series motors. Bad call on Ford's part. I would make it the standard engine in the whole ford lineup. But that's me.
Great motor, 900hp is within reach for these motors with stock heads and a power adder. However when we start to knock on 1200hp mark you want more flow.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sickwindsor View PostI heard the truck motor was different?Originally posted by PGreenCobraI can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!Originally posted by Trip McNeelyOriginally posted by dsrtuckteezydont downshift!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DON SVO View Postcams and intake. Most road race guys are going to use a BOSS intake anyways, and Aggie97 said he's going to use aftermarket cams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aggie97 View Postonly in time. I am trying to poor boy this to get it running, then over the next year add the Boss intake, LT's and cams. It will be an immediate bump in HP and extended rpm range. I will probably do the other mods mid year so I can get the car on track sooner. Can't wait to start working on this!ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
Originally posted by jw33 View PostDry sump?
Comment
Comment