I've daily drove with 7psi for 3 years and no intercooler or meth. Don't be a pussy
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eaton on a 302?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostI figure using a systemax lower, brodix heads and an Anderson b25 should net 500rwhp with less boost.
A daily driven non intercooled car bothers me.
For $1200 it sure seems hard to beat!
Comment
-
There is a guy selling a coupe on CL with this kit. It looks cool until you see the hole cut in the hood for the snout and pulley. By the time you get all of the supporting hardware for this kit you could have gotten a basic vortech kit or the On3 turbo kit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by turbostang View PostFuck that. I'm sure there's a better way to do that - but as it stands, that kit will require some huge, nasty uglified hood. Not to mention that bracket system they've made to support the bearing looks like it was done with a torch, by stevie wonder himself...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snatch Napkin View PostWhich is why my idea had the blower turned on its side. This also left room for an intercooler. The intercooler would not be as big as the one found in the mod motors, but it would have been better than nothing.1993 Vibrant Red Cobra #1741.
If you want more inches - Stroke it!!!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Venom View PostThere is a guy selling a coupe on CL with this kit. It looks cool until you see the hole cut in the hood for the snout and pulley. By the time you get all of the supporting hardware for this kit you could have gotten a basic vortech kit or the On3 turbo kit.
http://dallas.craigslist.org/ftw/cto/3268751167.html
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
Originally posted by FoxBodyNick View Postsimilar to BBKs old setup??Originally posted by dville_gt View PostKind of like this?
Mine required removal of the distributor. I was debating on going with a computer and harness from a 5.0 exploder or mega squirt.
The blower on its side, positioned more forward, and tucked down as far as it could go. The intercooler would be much longer and fatter than the elbow shown above, yet considerably shorter in height.
It would still require a cowl hood, but a 2.5" would have provided plenty of room. No hole would be required for the blower pulley.
Again, this was all in theory, on paper, and crude measurements using my foxbody with stock hood, an '87 with a 2.5" cowl, explorer (gt40) intake, and measurements from an Eaton that was removed from a 2007 GT500.
That idea got scrapped when I saw my first spy shots of the ZR1 blower setup and then Edelbrock's blower setup.
When I realized so much more could be done by turning the blower upside down and removing the distributor it was all a waste.
Comment
-
It's nice to see someone finally made an intake to do this. Back around '00 I don't believe it was possible, and I like some others in here considered mocking up an intake to make some cheap power."When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
-
that guy actually makes the same design but the blower sits 45 degrees more towards the driver side to clear the stock hood. this setup also utilizes the stock serp belt and doesnt come with a tensioner. not too sure how much belt slip you would get but i thought about selling my FMS SVO powerdyne kit and trying this out instead on the lighting. there is also a guy out there on the corral and nloc that has made his own intake and runs an 871 blower on a gt40 lower. anyways for 1200 bucks its definitely an affordable way to step into the boost world
RESIDENT ELECTRICIAN AND WIRING GURU!!!!
Comment
-
like this
found here
of course he is using a 3.4 whipple but same principle
RESIDENT ELECTRICIAN AND WIRING GURU!!!!
Comment
Comment