Originally posted by 91CoupeMike
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Popping sound from rear of car.
Collapse
X
-
the uppers have to change length as the rear moves up and down, rubber bushings will squish and let that happen. Poly wont, and you will be putting the rear in a bind. Check out Maximum Motorsports website, they have a nice explaination of how it works, and why NOT to use poly *uppers only*.
So yes, you can rip the torque boxes to hell, but you need to reinforce them either way."If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
Comment
-
These Ford rear upper control arms are direct replacements for the 1979-2004 Mustang (non-IRS) control arms. They will restore performance lost to old and deteriorating rubber bushings. These control arms have the stiffest rubber bushings available, and are much stiffer than what came originally on the Fox chassis Mustangs. Although Ford Racing Performance Parts claims their bushings to be "twice as stiff" as stock, our testing has shown that while they are much stiffer than Fox chassis bushings, they are identical to the 1994-04 bushings.
We performed extensive testing of rear upper control arm bushing materials during the development of our Panhard Bar. When retaining the original four-link suspension, the best compromise between resistance to suspension bind, best control of axle position, best ride quality, and least potential damage to the chassis, is to retain rubber bushings in the rear upper control arms. This is especially important when adding a Panhard Bar. The compliance of a rubber-bushed upper control arm is required when a Panhard bar is added to the Mustang four-link suspension.
When installed on a 1979-93 Mustang, these control arms, with their stiffer rubber bushings, help limit axle wind-up and side-to-side motion, but will not damage your Mustang's upper control arm mounting points (torque boxes) as a standard urethane-bushed upper control arm would. See our extended technical information about bushing material choices in our Rear Lower Control Arm tech section.
While for 1994-04 cars these control arms offer no improvement in performance, as they do on Fox chassis cars, they are a great value when replacing arms with damaged or aged bushings. Because rubber deteriorates simply from age, after several years the control arms are ready for replacement. High horsepower cars and those used for track events tend to damage bushings before they can degrade from age. These replacement control arms, along with the axle end bushings, are a great way to bring back or upgrade the performance of your Mustang.One day at a time.
Comment
-
-
You dont want poly bushing for the uppers, only use rubber bushings.
I have only found two places online to order good/rubber axle bushings from.
Summit - Ford Racing Rubber Axle Bushings - M-4050-B
Maximum Motorsports - Rubber Axle Bushings - E4SZ-5A
1991 5.0 Mustang LX-Hatch, BBK Cold Air Intake, BBK Headers, BBK X-Pipe, Flowmaster 40's, HPM C/C Plates, Cobra Sway-Bar, UPR Subframe Connectors, UPR Control Arms, FRPP Aluminum Driveshaft, FRPP "C" Springs, FRPP 31 Spine Diff, Moser 31 Spline Axles, FRPP 3:73 Gears, Tokico Blue Shocks, King Cobra Clutch, MSD Ignition, Taurus Electric Fan, BBK Gripp Shifter, & More
Comment
-
-
-
What shape are the bushings in?
I had got some from a friend and they had a few cracks and I also got some from my parts car.. None of them were in perfect shape. It didn't do it until after driving a few miles.
It was fine backing out of the garage, fine coming off the stop signs, hills ect.. But I went into an open lot and put it in reverse and forward a few times and it came back. At first it only happened in reverse, ALOT less severe then at first. Then it started back in forward motion and gradually got worse and worse.
It's coming from the passengers side, I noticed the pasenger arm went in easier and had some space on the sides of the bushings, while the driver side was snug.
The lower control arm on the passenger side went in easier as well.
What do you guys think? I'm somewhat puzzled. It's a suspension issue for sure not a drive line..
Should I just tighten the crap out of it? I got them pretty damn good with the car loaded.
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
Comment