A cam advertised in a 302, powerband shifts down in a 351

[barronj]

I'm pretty sure that, as I understand it, a cam advertised for a 302 will have the advertised power band shift down if installed in a 351.

How much of a shift are we talking?

If the e303 isadvertised as 1500-5500 power band, what might/could that equal on the 351, or is there no rule of thumb?

This is not a discussion on the merits of the E303 or how it's antiquated technology, not trying to go down that road.

[Blackpony]

It wont really shift the powerband much, couple hundred maybe.. but it will benefit from a cam better suited for the extra cubes

[Jimbo]

I've used the E303 in a 351w. It moves the powerband up quite a bit, it pulled much harder to 6k rpm.

[thesource]

With all things being exactly the same between the two with only cubic inches being different, about 500 rpms. I have a TFS stage 3 in my 393 and it pretty much is done by 5900 rpms. In a 302 with the same exact shit on it, it should be done around 6700 rpms.