Originally posted by 71chevellejohn
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
5 lug fox rotor.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostI am, I just need to get the money. I'll shoot you a pm a day or 2 in advance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostWhat drums will still work?
If like rear disk but I heard that takes a lot of parts swapping.
They do show a front/rear kit for $400
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 85turbocoupe View PostFYI make sure you get 94/95 spindles only if you still have the stock kmember. Where the tie rod mounts to the spindle on the 94/95 are curved, Where as the 96+ will be straight. 96+ increase track width and worse cause dangerous bumpsteer conditions when using the stock kmember.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 71chevellejohn View PostThe SVO rotor affects the wheel offset if I remember correctly.
the 93 Cobras had a different height of "hat" and used the fox mustang control arms and 87-88 Turbo Coupe rear axles/brakes. the thunderbirds used the wider a-arm
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cooter View Postnegatory... lincolns had a wider A-arm and axles... same with the SVO...
the 93 Cobras had a different height of "hat" and used the fox mustang control arms and 87-88 Turbo Coupe rear axles/brakes. the thunderbirds used the wider a-arm.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BlueCoupeRedVert View PostGo the better way.. with sn95 or sn97 parts. My coupe has all 95 Cobra stuff. The Vert has all '02 GT stuff. I bet it is easier to find late model parts cheap than older Lincoln/ranger parts.
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
Originally posted by homealone View PostYou're half right. The curved steering arm of the 94/95 spindle will induce bumpsteer which will get worse when you lower the vehicle.
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
Comment