Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What power does it take to get a full weight fox in the 9's?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #16
    Well shit with my 2700lb shitbox I should run pretty damn good with 450-500rwhp.


    320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'

    DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq

    Comment

    • #17
      Originally posted by Junkie View Post
      Wow low mph, looked at another video of his and he went 9.80@130+ which makes more sense. I would like 140mph traps personally, but not all 76mm's are created equal.
      My 3:55 sucked at 1/4
      If I would of changed them, I would of trapped alittle more mph. That was with a 67mm turbo, 306 and AOD trans.

      Comment

      • #18
        alot

        Comment

        • #19
          Originally posted by FRANCISCO308 View Post
          My 3:55 sucked at 1/4
          If I would of changed them, I would of trapped alittle more mph. That was with a 67mm turbo, 306 and AOD trans.
          I have 355's, trap 131-133 running a high 9. 3200lbs with driver, no idea what it makes the the wheels but we think it's around 760-780 flywheel horse. not sure what that would make at the tires through a stalled C4.
          Vortex rear stand $75
          8.8 410s. $50

          **SKAGG NASTY**
          My goal in life is to not arrive at the grave in a well preserved body.
          but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "holy shit!!!.. what a ride!"

          1990 Foxbody GT for that ass
          11 4 door
          13 FX2 White 5.0

          Comment

          • #20
            Originally posted by Txstang1 View Post
            I have 355's, trap 131-133 running a high 9. 3200lbs with driver, no idea what it makes the the wheels but we think it's around 760-780 flywheel horse. not sure what that would make at the tires through a stalled C4.
            They didn't work for me.
            Did you go to the gut last night?

            Comment

            • #21
              Originally posted by FRANCISCO308 View Post
              They didn't work for me.
              Did you go to the gut last night?
              yea i did, dont know why though
              Vortex rear stand $75
              8.8 410s. $50

              **SKAGG NASTY**
              My goal in life is to not arrive at the grave in a well preserved body.
              but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "holy shit!!!.. what a ride!"

              1990 Foxbody GT for that ass
              11 4 door
              13 FX2 White 5.0

              Comment

              • #22
                Originally posted by Txstang1 View Post
                yea i did, dont know why though
                Did you bust anyones ass?
                I got there, when you guys were leaving. Wanna seel the bogarts

                Comment

                • #23
                  Originally posted by FRANCISCO308 View Post
                  Did you bust anyones ass?
                  I got there, when you guys were leaving. Wanna seel the bogarts
                  That's a big negative on the bogeys...lol.

                  Naw, I couldn't get it to hook, and the once or twice it did hook, as soon as you get out to the new surface, which is lower than the concrete btw, it blew them off again. Hopefully Crandal or Redline will be open this weekend.
                  Vortex rear stand $75
                  8.8 410s. $50

                  **SKAGG NASTY**
                  My goal in life is to not arrive at the grave in a well preserved body.
                  but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "holy shit!!!.. what a ride!"

                  1990 Foxbody GT for that ass
                  11 4 door
                  13 FX2 White 5.0

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    he must have lifted at the lights

                    Originally posted by Junkie View Post
                    Wow low mph, looked at another video of his and he went 9.80@130+ which makes more sense. I would like 140mph traps personally, but not all 76mm's are created equal.
                    116 @ 9.98 is because he lifted
                    Don't worry about what you can't change.
                    Do the best you can with what you have.
                    Be honest, even if it hurts.

                    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" ... Winston Churchill

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      Originally posted by jyro View Post
                      116 @ 9.98 is because he lifted
                      lol yes I know
                      -1997 Supra- mid 8 second street car
                      -1993 Cobra- 700rw
                      -2012 CTS-V- 9 second daily driver
                      -1991 Coupe- LSA/TT/4L80 in the making
                      -2007 GSXR 1000- built turbo bike

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        9's @?

                        I know 525rwhp @ 3100 will run 9.70. We've done it several times with different combos. So I would say around 600rwhp will get it done as long as the car leaves well. Travis

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          When I'm rich I want a do a Cleveland coupe. Run 9s on 351 ci and stock heads.
                          Full time ninja editor.

                          Comment

                          Previous 1 2 template Next
                          Working...
                          X