Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fear Mongering

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by naynay View Post
    try again.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by svauto-erotic855 View Post
      Cancer has been around longer then labs to invent it in have been around.

      If it was created in a lab and can be controlled why hasn't it been used to kill all the blacks before they turn 25? We could get rid of white guilt in no time if there were no coloreds and the elimination of several strains of mankind would be a small price to pay for that. Besides, blacks are not needed for labor anymore; we got wetbacks for that. There is even a machine that runs on diesel fuel that will pick cotton but the down side to that machine is that you can not fuck its daughters in the middle of the night when you are drunk. Sweet brown sugar, how come you taste sooo good? I know that I would have been fathering lots of mulattos and quadroons if I had owned a bunch of teen darkies. The thought of that is almost as exciting as thinking about the really hard core BDS&M shit SS-Hauptsturmführer Klaus Barbie(AKA "Butcher of Lyon")and his 2 dogs did to the jews.

      Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.


      Check out the lyrics. They are eye opening the first time you see them.
      Sickle cell?

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by naynay View Post
        you probably also dont believe that cancer was conjured up in a science lab, in an effort to control the population.
        Not unless the lab, and that effort, had access to time travel.


        The discovery challenges scientific assumptions that cancers and tumours are a result of modern lifestyles and environment.

        Comment


        • #79
          Oops, naynay's tinfoil hat mongering has fallen victim to science.

          Comment


          • #80
            really, check the credibility of the source:

            Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.


            you'd have to be a real dumb fuck (see: sc281) to cite anything from a source such as sky news.
            THE BAD HOMBRE

            Comment


            • #81
              I forgot you dont click links. See as follows:

              n April 2003 the Sky News Network carried a report from James Forlong aboard the British nuclear submarine HMS Splendid purportedly showing a live firing of a cruise missile, at sea in the Persian Gulf, during the Iraq war. The report included scenes of the crew members giving instructions related to the launch of the missile and included a sequence in which a crew member pressed a large red button marked with the word "FIRE" and accompanied by a sequence of a missile breaking the surface of the water and launching into the air. The report was a fabrication, with the crew acting along for the benefit of the cameras. The Sky News team did not accompany the submarine when it left port and the scenes were actually recorded whilst the vessel was docked. The shot of the missile breaking the surface had been obtained from stock footage.

              The faked report was revealed because a BBC film crew did accompany the vessel to sea. The BBC crew filmed a real cruise missile launch for the BBC TV series Fighting the War. The BBC footage showed how, with modern computerised launching systems, a missile is not launched by pressing a red button but is actually launched with a left mouse click. Following the BBC's accusations, Forlong and his producer were suspended; the next day, The Guardian reported that Forlong had resigned following an internal investigation.[1]

              In a follow-up article, Guardian's Matt Wells speculated on the long-term effects on Sky News credibility.[2] In October 2003, Forlong was found dead by his wife after committing suicide by hanging.[3] In December, Sky News was fined £50,000 by the Independent Television Commission for breaching accuracy regulations.[4]
              THE BAD HOMBRE

              Comment


              • #82
                While I don't think science created cancer, I firmly believe science is keeping us from finding a cure.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by CWO View Post
                  While I don't think science created cancer, I firmly believe science is keeping us from finding a cure.
                  no, greed is keeping the already discovered cure under wraps.

                  god bless.
                  It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men -Frederick Douglass

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    For all those people who find it more convenient to bother you with their question rather than to Google it for themselves.
                    "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by naynay View Post
                      really, check the credibility of the source:

                      Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.


                      you'd have to be a real dumb fuck (see: sc281) to cite anything from a source such as sky news.
                      It seems like this discovery regarding cancer was being discussed on NPR earlier this week, but it matters not. I'm not donning my tinfoil over it.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by ELVIS View Post
                        no, greed is keeping the already discovered cure under wraps.

                        god bless.
                        Much more accurate. I agree.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by naynay View Post
                          really, check the credibility of the source:

                          Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.


                          you'd have to be a real dumb fuck (see: sc281) to cite anything from a source such as sky news.
                          Oh by source, do you mean the news site?

                          Here's a couple more for ya from the more, ahem, reputable news sites.

                          Maybe cancer isn’t so modern after all. A new discovery suggests the disease is more than a million years old.




                          Seems all of your "research" didn't pick up on the fact that a discovery like this MIGHT be on more than one.

                          Or by source, do you mean the Dr Patrick Randolph-Quinney, the Foresnic Anthropologist and Archaeologist at The University of Witwatersrand in Johannesberg?



                          Patrick is Reader in Biological and Forensic Anthropology, in the School of Forensic and Applied Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, UK. His broad…


                          Or by source do you mean the paper published by his team in the South African Journal of Sciences?

                          PDF | We describe the earliest evidence for neoplastic disease in the hominin lineage. This is reported from the type specimen of the extinct hominin... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate




                          But by all means, keep Nay'ing. The only thing worse than ignorance is willfull ignorance.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            you see, what I did there was have you get off of breitbart looking for muslims for a second, and actually engage your brain in something worthwhile.

                            remember the thread title?
                            THE BAD HOMBRE

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by naynay View Post
                              you see, what I did there was have you get off of breitbart looking for muslims for a second, and actually engage your brain in something worthwhile.

                              remember the thread title?
                              No. What you did there was show your ass and your ignorance- same as every other time you open your mouth with regard to anything substantive, and without regard to how fucking stupid you look.

                              You'll never change, even after being banned, shadow banned, banned again, and locked in this ridiculous part of the forum. You, the oozing boil on the ass of DFWM.

                              I'm done. I'm putting you on ignore so I don't have to be witness to you flinging your poo any longer, even if someone unbans you.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Thank you kind sir, I for one however, am a 35 year old man, and have been doing this here internet thing for some 25 years now. I know when to let shit slide, and when to let it really get to me. I have no need to block you, as your content is clearly comical, and rarely fact based.you pose no major threat to my life, love, or pursuit of my own personal happiness.

                                I pray for you and yours that you do not flip your shit over a bombing in france or germany and go all rambo here in the states. cause you are the type.

                                In closing, Thank you kindly, and good day to you, with the tip of a hat.
                                THE BAD HOMBRE

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X