Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I'll make sure and use this disclaimer next time I go to court.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'll make sure and use this disclaimer next time I go to court.

    The next time I plead, "not guilty", I'll refrain it with, "This is not any admission of guilt but avoids time-consuming and costly litigation". I wonder if that will work with the court.




    FORT WORTH (AP) - Fort Worth leaders will pay nearly half a million dollars to a man severely injured in a raid on a gay bar two years ago.

    The City Council on Tuesday approved a $400,000 settlement with Chad Gibson. He says he was the victim of excessive force by Fort Worth police and the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission in the Rainbow Lounge raid in 2009.

    The city has said the settlement of is not any admission of liability but avoids time-consuming and costly litigation.

    Two agents and a supervisor with the state's liquor board were later fired, and three Fort Worth police officers were suspended. Both agencies determined no excessive force was used.

    The state liquor board says it's also considering settling with Gibson the separate claims he filed against that agency.
    Last edited by line-em-up; 03-22-2011, 08:21 PM.

  • #2
    You've probably already done that, pleading nolo contendere for a traffic ticket.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by TENGRAM View Post
      You've probably already done that, pleading nolo contendere for a traffic ticket.
      I firmly believe you missed the dry sarcasm, or your attempt to be even more Ben Stein-esque just crashed in a ball of un-funny flames.
      Originally posted by PGreenCobra
      I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
      Originally posted by Trip McNeely
      Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
      dont downshift!!
      Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
        I firmly believe you missed the dry sarcasm, or your attempt to be even more Ben Stein-esque just crashed in a ball of un-funny flames.
        I have no idea who Ben Stein is so let's just say I missed the sarcasm. I guess I'm just used to seeing sarcasm used humorously...

        Comment


        • #5
          ...

          Originally posted by TENGRAM View Post
          You've probably already done that, pleading nolo contendere for a traffic ticket.

          What I meant to say was "no contest", not "not guilty". From my understanding, if you plead "no contest", you are still silently admitting guilt.


          Nolo contendere is a legal term that comes from the Latin for "I do not wish to contend." It is also referred to as a plea of no contest.

          In criminal trials, and in some common law jurisdictions, it is a plea where the defendant neither admits nor disputes a charge, serving as an alternative to a pleading of guilty or not guilty.

          A no-contest plea, while not technically a guilty plea, has the same immediate effect as a guilty plea, and is often offered as a part of a plea bargain.[1] In many jurisdictions a plea of nolo contendere is not a right, and carries various restrictions on its use.


          Comment


          • #6
            How much force would be considered "excessive" in a gay bar??? LMAO!

            Comment

            Working...
            X