I'm sure technology and increased monitoring have a role in that. As well as increasing population.
I would think the technology from now and 1900 has improved since then, no? I don't see what that has to do with anything considering some of the worst have happened early 1900's. Also, the highest deaths also occurred early 1900's too.
Originally posted by Cmarsh93z
Don't Fuck with DFWmustangs...the most powerfull gang I have ever been a member of.
GOD BLESS TEXAS August Landscaping 214-779-7278
Seb's high class.
He'll mow your grass.
He'll kick your ass.
And while his kidney stones pass,
He'll piss in a glass!
I would think the technology from now and 1900 has improved since then, no? I don't see what that has to do with anything considering some of the worst have happened early 1900's. Also, the highest deaths also occurred early 1900's too.
Yes it has improved and become more widespread...which is exactly why we would catch more...making sense yet?
Yes it has improved and become more widespread...which is exactly why we would catch more...making sense yet?
Not at all. I think you should look up to top ten earthquake list and see where they are geographically. I didn't know technology was required to know if the ground beneath them was shaking to holy hell and killed thousands of people.
Originally posted by Cmarsh93z
Don't Fuck with DFWmustangs...the most powerfull gang I have ever been a member of.
Not at all. I think you should look up to top ten earthquake list and see where they are geographically. I didn't know technology was required to know if the ground beneath them was shaking to holy hell and killed thousands of people.
Im sure there have been bigger quakes. Most of the world is unpopulated....
Of course in the early 1900s the only ones recorded would be in the presence of civlization.
But holy shit at the 9.5 in Chile, thats 700x stronger than the one in Japan.
Comment