Originally posted by 1carcrazyguy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Think I figured out what replaces the Mustang crowd
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostI just can't get into a 4,000+ pound performance car.
Comment
-
Sorry...Dodge hit a homerun on styling with the Challenger..at least it looks the part of the 70's that it is trying to emulate..albeit a thousand pounds heavier if not more. ALL of the Mopar RWD lineup...Charger, 300, Challenger, Magnum are all 4000+lb land barges. They proudly wear that HEMI badge since they came out. They need all of it to push that overweight land barge around. Not to mention the terrible front suspension that falls out from under it. The Hellcat is better at burnouts and wiping out at speed than anything else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostI just can't get into a 4,000+ pound performance car.
I actually feel the same on the weight of modern muscle. They are freaking heavy.sigpic18 F150 Supercrew - daily
17 F150 Supercrew - totaled Dec 12, 2018
13 DIB Premium GT, M6, Track Pack, Glass Roof, Nav, Recaros - Sold
86 SVO - Sold
'03 F150 Supercrew - Sold
01 TJ - new toy - Sold
65 F100 (460 + C6) - Sold
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chas_svo View PostI actually feel the same on the weight of modern muscle. They are freaking heavy.Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostThey are heavy for a reason, cars are built different now. All cars much more safer, since we are talking about muscle and pony cars. In my business, a fox body is a POS, they can barely take a front end hit without bending a fender apron and buckling the cowl. Of course I would own a 88-93 coupe and put in a coyote motor in it, but its still not very safe unless you add the "5k Mod". The new Mustangs meet a lot of safety requirements, roll over, front & rear end collisions all that adds weight. People love all the safety and that adds weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostThey are heavy for a reason, cars are built different now. All cars much more safer, since we are talking about muscle and pony cars. In my business, a fox body is a POS, they can barely take a front end hit without bending a fender apron and buckling the cowl. Of course I would own a 88-93 coupe and put in a coyote motor in it, but its still not very safe unless you add the "5k Mod". The new Mustangs meet a lot of safety requirements, roll over, front & rear end collisions all that adds weight. People love all the safety and that adds weight.
3600lbs isn't fox body levels, but it's squarely in the 4th gen trans am or 03/04 cobra levels.
Comment
-
A big part of the weight is the massive brakes they have to put on these porker muscle cars to get them to slow down. Most factory 15" rotors are heavy as hell.
I'd love to buy a Hellcat Challenger and completely gut it so I could drag race it.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
Comment