Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Greenville dealership shooting
Collapse
X
-
-
Yeah I hope their lives were worth what that man owed....dumb-ass decision by the BH's!Originally posted by Da PrezFuck dfwstangs!! If Jose ain't running it, I won't even bother going back to it, just my two cents!!Originally posted by VETTKLR
Cliff Notes: I can beat the fuck out of a ZR1
Comment
-
Yup, three dumb fucks met in Greenville Texas on Tuesday.
From what I saw in the video on my big screen, they (bh's) pulled their guns on the perp, when he pulled his gun they tried to bum rush him and the perp went into Barney Fife mode fumbling the gun, he gained control and shot the fat guy first and then they all shot each other Resovoir Dog style.
As soon as that fucker went for his gun they should have shot his ass.Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SS Junk View Postdo bounty hunters go through any sort of formal training?Originally posted by BradMBut, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.Originally posted by LeahIn other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shaggin Wagon View PostI just cant figure out how they think its okay to go to a dealership with people standing everywhere and have a shootout. They couldn't catch him out in the parking lot or something? Complete fucking morons.Fuck you. We're going to Costco.
Comment
-
stolen from a user on my main site.
Bounty hunters are constitutionally allowed
Bounty hunters have free rein in pursuing their quarry because constitutional restrictions are only binding on state actors—persons who are employed by and work for a unit of local, state, or municipal government. The Bill of Rights does not apply to bounty hunters because they are private actors, employed by the bondsman, who is a private businessperson. Because they are acting in a private occupational capacity, manhunters can question snared bail jumpers without Mirandizing them. Coerced incriminating statements they obtain from fugitives are even admissible in court.
Constitutional constraints, however, do apply to bounty hunters whenever they are legally deemed to be acting as state actors, thereby triggering Fourth and Fifth Amendment limitations on how the trackers do their job. The guiding principle for ascertaining when bounty hunters are acting as an instrument of the state, established by the Supreme Court in Lugar v. Edmondson, 457 U.S. 922 (1982), is whether they received “significant aid” from or “acted together” with law enforcement officers. Bounty hunters, and bondsmen, are most likely to lose their private actor status (a) if the police join forces with bounty hunters in making a warrantless home entry, house search, or in subduing the fugitive; and (b) if the trackers are working under the express direction, supervision, instigation, or at the behest of the police.
Don't phuck with the dog - he bitesTHE BAD HOMBRE
Comment
Comment