Originally posted by jakesford
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
6.2l Denali vs ecoboost F150?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Slow Five-O View PostDo NOT do an SSI tune please if you want to keep your motor. There are some good tunes and tuners out there. Steer clear of ssi.70' Chevelle RagTop
(Forever Under Construction)
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.”- Thomas A Edison
Comment
-
Have two 6.2s currently and they are great.
Pretty Much Any 07-13 GMC/Chevy the dash is going to crack and it sucks. Both of ours are. But, everything else is good enough that I overlook it.
Have an Employee that has an EB and loves it. It's been in the shop a few times but nothing serious and it was covered under warranty.
I'd own either but we've ended up in a GM product the last few times.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jakesford View PostI have had the infamous intercooler condensation issue happen on my '13 EB FX2, and I believe the '13s have the updated design. It was worse case scenario, with driving around the mountains in the rain for a few days and not really getting on the throttle at all. Then coming home it was cold and foggy and I had been highway cruising for about an hour. When I went to pass a semi at 60, floored it and got hesitation and limp mode. Restarted it in neutral and all was good. I figure it has been building up for a few days with cold and high humidity with no full throttle.
That has been the only issue in 40k miles. Oh and putting larger/Heavier tires will kill your MPG, same as any truck.
A lot of guys are drilling a 1/16" weep hole in the bottom of the lower part of the CAC.2014 GT
2013 FX2 ecoboost
Comment
-
Originally posted by A_A_G View PostGM being GM as always, cutting corners. Luckily my '02 is still trucking with 215k miles.
The EB is still a bit new to make that same claim, I've seen a lot of them advertised with 100K+ already, but still a little early to tell on the 200K+ claims....and it's safe to say that is a much higher replacement cost vs a 5.3 or 6.0 from GM. Just some things to consider.70' Chevelle RagTop
(Forever Under Construction)
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.”- Thomas A Edison
Comment
-
6.2l Denali vs ecoboost F150?
Originally posted by Rreemo View PostAre we talking about the same SSI, in Florida? If so....do tell? This is the first time I've heard anything bad about them...most I've seen are rave reviews, but admittedly haven't been on that site in while.
There is a lot of good info in some Facebook groups. There are a couple groups ran by ssi and they delete anything immediately that says anything bad about them. Ecoboost performance is one of them.
The owner is an ass and straight up doesn't care. Shawn Ellis is his name. He makes fast tunes because he turns it up passed the safe mark and it's only a matter of time before failure. There are dozens and dozens of accounts I've seen from this tuner that are negative or worse.
I hope the pics show, I've never used tapatalk to put up pics.
ILast edited by Slow Five-O; 12-01-2015, 01:59 PM.2014 GT
2013 FX2 ecoboost
Comment
-
Anyway back on regular topic. With a good safe tune the ecoboost is putting down AWESOME numbers.
I'd like to run a 6.2 sometime. I've run a 5.3 and a 4.8 and I've had truck lengths on both.
I'm a bit partial to how nice my truck is because before it I've never owned anything newer than 10 years at any time haha.2014 GT
2013 FX2 ecoboost
Comment
-
Good info - thanks! When I started poking around a year or so ago there were a bunch of recommendations for SSI, and I think it was someone out here that referred me to F150ecotuning.com, which now that you pointed it out, appears to be their home forum.
Now that I'm looking more - some of those comments are scary enough to just leave it stock.
As a backup, I've always thought Livernois was a trusted name in the business...what are some others that folks are having good results from?70' Chevelle RagTop
(Forever Under Construction)
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.”- Thomas A Edison
Comment
-
Originally posted by A_A_G View PostGM being GM as always, cutting corners. Luckily my '02 is still trucking with 215k miles.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rreemo View PostGood info - thanks! When I started poking around a year or so ago there were a bunch of recommendations for SSI, and I think it was someone out here that referred me to F150ecotuning.com, which now that you pointed it out, appears to be their home forum.
Now that I'm looking more - some of those comments are scary enough to just leave it stock.
As a backup, I've always thought Livernois was a trusted name in the business...what are some others that folks are having good results from?
I've heard good things from livernois and a couple others. I'm trying not to spend too much money on the truck, but if I get a tune, I will go with a 5 star tune.
It's not as radical of a tune as some of the others but most report that they pick up a good bit while also getting better mpg (when not in boost of coarse). 5 star even offers warranties for their tunes. I've never heard of anyone hurting their motor on a 5 star tune. There's a guy on that forum I mentioned claiming 186k miles and has had a 5 star tune since 25k miles.2014 GT
2013 FX2 ecoboost
Comment
-
Check out stage 3 motor sports. They even offer a full warranty (for a price) that will pay to replace the engine/drivetrain if a failure occurs due to their tune."Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776
Comment
-
Originally posted by red89notch View PostDon't forget about the crazy seat squeaks in the King Ranch trucks! I can't believe nobody has mentioned it."If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
Comment
Comment