Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

News crew shooting in Virginia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • if only we could see this from a gay black man's perspective.
    "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

    Comment


    • Gay black man kills two honkies? I am surprised there is even a news story.
      Originally posted by racrguy
      What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
      Originally posted by racrguy
      Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by A_A_G View Post
        Explain how a gun would've made them aware of their surroundings....
        Originally posted by BLAKE View Post
        Exactly, which is why the "if only the victims had been armed" conversation does not help the gun rights argument.
        I'll argue if the interview-ee had been armed, she and the cameraman might still be alive.
        "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

        Comment


        • Originally posted by A_A_G View Post
          Nothing, because as a former anchor, he knew this type of job involves hecklers and you have to ignore and be professional during a live airing.

          These three people, had they been armed, would not have made a difference, the video clearly shows why.
          I haven't watched the video, so I'm assuming that he got off all shots in a couple of seconds?
          http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

          Comment


          • Originally posted by GhostTX View Post
            I'll argue if the interview-ee had been armed, she and the cameraman might still be alive.
            this was my assumption

            there aren't any guarantees, obviously... but the chances of that happening are infinitely better if she's armed and has shot the gun a few times in her life than with everybody being unarmed
            http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Cooter View Post
              I haven't watched the video, so I'm assuming that he got off all shots in a couple of seconds?
              Originally posted by Cooter View Post
              this was my assumption

              there aren't any guarantees, obviously... but the chances of that happening are infinitely better if she's armed and has shot the gun a few times in her life than with everybody being unarmed
              Ya...several shots in a few seconds. Plus it was point blank, he wasn't even aiming. So our interview-ee wouldn't need much of a skill set, to your point.
              "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

              Comment


              • Gun control laws aren't going to stop sick in the head individuals.

                PERIOD

                Comment


                • Originally posted by mstng86 View Post
                  Gun control laws aren't going to stop sick in the head individuals.

                  PERIOD
                  This right here. He could have just as easily done this with a knife. They are focused on the broadcast and tuning him out. Plenty of distraction for him to have pulled a knife and killed them.

                  Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
                  Originally posted by Leah
                  Best balls I've had in my mouth in a while.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by mstng86 View Post
                    Gun control laws aren't going to stop sick in the head individuals.

                    PERIOD
                    never have, never will...

                    an armed society is a polite society
                    http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by GhostTX View Post
                      I'll argue if the interview-ee had been armed, she and the cameraman might still be alive.
                      You're right, that middle-aged lady with no purse who was focused on giving a good interview on live TV is the perfect Charlie Bronson.



                      lol

                      Comment


                      • you're right... she couldn't have done anything. we should just outlaw guns!
                        http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by BLAKE View Post
                          You're right, that middle-aged lady with no purse who was focused on giving a good interview on live TV is the perfect Charlie Bronson.



                          lol
                          Why does she need a purse to be armed? And what's age have to do with it? And I already mentioned skill set. We can agree everyone was focused on the interview, but once shots were fired, you can react after that. I'm not assuming she was at yellow condition. It's obvious they were all at white. But the shooter was focused on the interviewer. He fired three rounds at her before she ran and then he continued to shoot at her while she ran. That's plenty of time for the interviewee to react and draw before the shooter turned on the cameraman.
                          "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

                          Comment


                          • no way dude! police officers are the only ones professional enough to handle a glock 40
                            http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Denny
                              Rodney already gave his two cents in here. What more do you want?
                              he wants penis.

                              more penis.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Tremor14 View Post
                                the fact that there was no blood, no impact, just a standard flinch and run.. then the news piece from last week. makes me wonder.
                                Read this and educate yourself:



                                When you perceive a threat, the body activates the stress response. The stress response occurs in both your body and brain.

                                The body’s response to acute stress is a preparation for emergency. Adrenaline and other hormones are released. The body shuts down processes associated with long-term care. When under immediate threat, digestion, reproduction, cell repair and other body tasks related to long-term functioning are unimportant.

                                Of immediate importance is survival. Increased blood sugar can provide extra energy for muscles. Increases in cortisol counter pain and inflammation. Blood pressure increases. Blood is diverted from our extremities to our major muscles to provide us with extra strength. Increased endorphins can help us ignore physical pain.

                                You can see the effects of these changes to the body in many of the symptoms of stress, such as racing heart, dizziness, nausea, shortness of breath, shaking, feeling hot and flushed, and sweating.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X