I've driven two, one was a basic EB and the second had the performance pkg with 3:55's, If I bought one it would have the PP for sure. The basic one felt very slow, you had to really dig into the pedal to feel the powa and only felt semi-strong on the highway. The PP you could tell had 300HP (or like CM sez, 275rwhp). I guess it would be OK but I wasn't very impressed, give me a 5.0 all day, err day...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Had a new Ecoboost convertible mustang for 4 days
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Whiteboy View PostMy wife loves her PP EB 2015 mustang fully loaded. handles better then my shelby
If the car had been for me, it damned sure wouldn't have had an EB in it, but that's what she wanted and it makes sense for her....it's still fun to drive, and agree with you that it handles really well for what it is....but I do think that the ride can tend to be a little harsh at times.
I'm curious what she'll think when there is eventually a flat plane 5.2 sitting next to it in the garage!70' Chevelle RagTop
(Forever Under Construction)
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.”- Thomas A Edison
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostI've driven two, one was a basic EB and the second had the performance pkg with 3:55's, If I bought one it would have the PP for sure. The basic one felt very slow, you had to really dig into the pedal to feel the powa and only felt semi-strong on the highway. The PP you could tell had 300HP (or like CM sez, 275rwhp). I guess it would be OK but I wasn't very impressed, give me a 5.0 all day, err day...
Comment
-
Originally posted by A_A_G View Post3.31 vs 3.55 gears
*In Automatics, not sure what gearing the standards have. Also the Autos are slighty lighter in EB version by 8 lbs than the standard tranny's...Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostUhhh wrong, they have 3.15's vs 3:55's*.
*In Automatics, not sure what gearing the standards have. Also the Autos are slighty lighter in EB version by 8 lbs than the standard tranny's...
Auto comes with 3.15 and can be upgraded to 3.55
Manual comes with 3.31 and can be upgraded to 3.55
Comment
-
Originally posted by A_A_G View Post3.31 as I stated. I was comparing a Base manual vs one with the Performance Pack. Forgot the OP stated this was a rental.
Auto comes with 3.15 and can be upgraded to 3.55
Manual comes with 3.31 and can be upgraded to 3.55Originally posted by SilverbackLook all you want, she can't find anyone else who treats her as bad as I do, and I keep her self esteem so low, she wouldn't think twice about going anywhere else.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostCool, he did state it was an Auto and I referenced that tranny only and those were the two that I drove on two seperate occasions. I have only built autos on Fords website, but I might just buy a loaded Fusion with the 2.0 EB since I already have a 5.0 and don't really need another Stang...or do I...
Comment
-
We have a 2015 fusion also with the 2.0 ecoboost...really nice daily, but the stang kills it in mpg odd enough. Turbo on the fusion is so spool happy, it's hard to stay out of boost. 28 to 30 mpg in fusion, while I have pulled down 36 to 38 in stang on the highway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rick Modena View PostCool, he did state it was an Auto and I referenced that tranny only and those were the two that I drove on two seperate occasions. I have only built autos on Fords website, but I might just buy a loaded Fusion with the 2.0 EB since I already have a 5.0 and don't really need another Stang...or do I...
Comment
Comment