So, the police stole my buddies car trailer...

[TeeShock]

I never said they didn't. I have no use for them . Support them all you want. They're scum and pray on weak people.

They won't get any stronger if you keep fighting their fights for them.

[Ruffdaddy]

I never said they didn't. I have no use for them . Support them all you want. They're scum and pray on weak people.

You talking about the government?

[dcs13]

they won't get any stronger if you keep fighting their fights for them.

huh ?

[TeeShock]

huh ?

Some say the cucumbers taste better pickled...

[bcoop]

I never said they didn't. I have no use for them . Support them all you want. They're scum and pray on weak people.

Lmfao! This is highly comical, as are the rest of your worthless posts in this thread.

[Broncojohnny]

Actually the "lienholder" has an "innocent owner defense". Because they have an interest in the property, and they did not commit the felony offense, they shouldn't lose their interest. That's why the big boy dope dealers don't have stuff in their names...
And in your contract, you stipulate that you won't use the vehicle or property for illegal acts or they can demand the note due or reposses to satisfy their interest. Because if they give it back and the guy gets popped dealing again, they no longer have an "innocent owner" defense.

Don't claim that anyone in the police department cares about innocent owners. That is a fucking lie. The innocent owner defense only works if you have a lawyer backing you up to enforce it. In fact, if you bring it up the police and the DA will start threatening you with other charges or start claiming that you are going to have to pay their legal fees if the case is decided in their favor. The ACLU has a stack of cases where that scenario has unfolded many times. As I said, most banks have lawyers sitting around with nothing to do. They eat shitheel cops and greenhorn public counsellors for breakfast and that is why they get their property back.

[helosailor]

Some say the cucumbers taste better pickled...

Some say that his voice can only be heard by cats, and that he has two sets of knees.

[dcs13]

Don't claim that anyone in the police department cares about innocent owners. That is a fucking lie. The innocent owner defense only works if you have a lawyer backing you up to enforce it. In fact, if you bring it up the police and the DA will start threatening you with other charges or start claiming that you are going to have to pay their legal fees if the case is decided in their favor. The ACLU has a stack of cases where that scenario has unfolded many times. As I said, most banks have lawyers sitting around with nothing to do. They eat shitheel cops and greenhorn public counsellors for breakfast and that is why they get their property back.

I don't believe a said the cops care. the fact is that once the asset forfeiture case is filed, all parties with an INTEREST (read lien) are served. At that point, anyone with an interest can assert their response. In the case of a lien holder , it would be an innocent owner defense. The DA's office civil section handles these. The DA will generally reject cases with an obvious innocent owner, or a lien that outweighs the value of the vehicle.
I'm just trying to enlighten you guys to the process. I never said I agreed with ALL of it, some yes. But I do have some education on the matters at which are being discussed. As for the matters I bring you facts and cite my sources. Just like the original discussion on the trailer, it was confirmed stolen. The guy that had it bought it from someone who probably bought it from a THIEF. Don't by shit without titles people. In that case I cited the texas supreme court ruling on seizing suspected stolen property. And low and behold the trailer in question that started this was stolen...
As for my opinions on dope dealers. I could care less if you agree. Support them all you want. You show me a thief , and I bet their a doper...Got no use for any of them.
So, cusss at me when you have no legitimate response, thats fine. I just try to offer real answers when you guys bring up these topics , rather than the pissing and moaning responses that have no foundation...

[Gasser64]

One thing many of you may not have picked up on in the TCU story is how property with liens is treated. If a bank has a note on something they shy away from trying to take it. This is because banks have armies of lawyers who routinely crucify these idiots in legal proceedings. They do their best to only steal from folks who don't have the deep pockets to fund a legal battle.

Very nice. I always **wondered** about that. I'm glad when the city or state or government of any kind takes a fucking for being pieces of shit. Can you post a link or two about them getting crucified for it? I'd like to read about it.

Have no issues with guns or alcohol. Love em both, just not too much of the one, while using the other.
Illegal drugs, a whole different ball game. Drug dealers are scum and pray on the weak to make their profits and support their habits. They care nothing about what happens to the users. Eff them.

Unless they're selling "natural" drugs, which have no harmful effects on the health of the user, such as Cannabis, Magic mushrooms, Aayahausca, Peyote cactus, etc etc. Alcohol and cigarettes are waaaay worse for your health than those will ever be. Do some research and find out. Meth and shit, you might have a point, but at least beat the shit out of the kid first.

As for all this seizing property happy horseshit, here's my solution. Constitutional amendment saying no government seizure of any kind in all the land, can ever used to add to the gub'mint coffers. It all MUST be given to charity, within 30 days, no exceptions. This includes all levels of government from top to bottom. The government has the only source of income that it needs, which are taxes. Trying to circumvent this law or ignoring it results in immediate removal from office followed by public hanging.

Without the ability to use it for their own gain, you'd see that they can't be bothered to confiscate anything that wasn't involved in actual crimes.

[bcoop]

As for all this seizing property happy horseshit, here's my solution. Constitutional amendment saying no government seizure of any kind in all the land, can ever used to add to the gub'mint coffers. It all MUST be given to charity, within 30 days, no exceptions. This includes all levels of government from top to bottom. The government has the only source of income that it needs, which are taxes. Trying to circumvent this law or ignoring it results in immediate removal from office followed by public hanging.

Without the ability to use it for their own gain, you'd see that they can't be bothered to confiscate anything that wasn't involved in actual crimes.

They would simply set up a non profit benefitting families of fallen officers, one to benefit "underfunded" departments, etc. That would only lead to the same abuses we have now. The fact of the matter is, the govt should have to provide undeniable proof and apply the same due process given to alleged criminals, if they want to seize anything.

[Broncojohnny]

I don't believe a said the cops care. the fact is that once the asset forfeiture case is filed, all parties with an INTEREST (read lien) are served. At that point, anyone with an interest can assert their response. In the case of a lien holder , it would be an innocent owner defense. The DA's office civil section handles these. The DA will generally reject cases with an obvious innocent owner, or a lien that outweighs the value of the vehicle.
I'm just trying to enlighten you guys to the process. I never said I agreed with ALL of it, some yes. But I do have some education on the matters at which are being discussed. As for the matters I bring you facts and cite my sources. Just like the original discussion on the trailer, it was confirmed stolen. The guy that had it bought it from someone who probably bought it from a THIEF. Don't by shit without titles people. In that case I cited the texas supreme court ruling on seizing suspected stolen property. And low and behold the trailer in question that started this was stolen...
As for my opinions on dope dealers. I could care less if you agree. Support them all you want. You show me a thief , and I bet their a doper...Got no use for any of them.
So, cusss at me when you have no legitimate response, thats fine. I just try to offer real answers when you guys bring up these topics , rather than the pissing and moaning responses that have no foundation...

All you are doing is offering the typical cop spin on things. When it suits your point you'll point out the letter of the law and how things should operate. That is until real world experience and how things actually work supports some other point. We have seen all of this before, no one here is going to fall for this nonsense.

[Broncojohnny]

They would simply set up a non profit benefitting families of fallen officers, one to benefit "underfunded" departments, etc. That would only lead to the same abuses we have now. The fact of the matter is, the govt should have to provide undeniable proof and apply the same due process given to alleged criminals, if they want to seize anything.

Exactly. Of course the police act like that will be the end of the world. I wonder if it has something to do with the money they get to steal under the current laws?

[kingjason]

One thing many of you may not have picked up on in the TCU story is how property with liens is treated. If a bank has a note on something they shy away from trying to take it. This is because banks have armies of lawyers who routinely crucify these idiots in legal proceedings. They do their best to only steal from folks who don't have the deep pockets to fund a legal battle.

This is incorrect from what I have seen anyways. It all depends on how much is owed to the bank. They don't routinely try to screw the bank as they are not the ones that committed the felony. It comes down to what the vehicle is worth, and if the department wants to pay it off through the bank and seize it. Say a guy owns a Viper worth 40k and owes 3k on it. Department might pay it off and seize it. I have never seen a department try to seize a vehicle when bunch was owed on it. Has nothing to do with the lawyers sitting around the banks being bored, as far as I have seen.

Years ago it was figured out a bunch of gentlemen had a fake company set up that was holding a fake lien on big money cars that were paid off by people doing bad things. I think the IRS stepped in and seized the business and every car attached to it, then divided it up. Like 10 or more cars and some high end exotics. There was a article in the paper on it as all the cars were held at a local PD.

[dcs13]

Very nice. I always **wondered** about that. I'm glad when the city or state or government of any kind takes a fucking for being pieces of shit. Can you post a link or two about them getting crucified for it? I'd like to read about it.
.

I'm up for some light reading...cite your sources and I will research as well

[Baron Von Crowder]

I don't believe a said the cops care. the fact is that once the asset forfeiture case is filed, all parties with an INTEREST (read lien) are served. At that point, anyone with an interest can assert their response. In the case of a lien holder , it would be an innocent owner defense. The DA's office civil section handles these. The DA will generally reject cases with an obvious innocent owner, or a lien that outweighs the value of the vehicle.
I'm just trying to enlighten you guys to the process. I never said I agreed with ALL of it, some yes. But I do have some education on the matters at which are being discussed. As for the matters I bring you facts and cite my sources. Just like the original discussion on the trailer, it was confirmed stolen. The guy that had it bought it from someone who probably bought it from a THIEF. Don't by shit without titles people. In that case I cited the texas supreme court ruling on seizing suspected stolen property. And low and behold the trailer in question that started this was stolen...
As for my opinions on dope dealers. I could care less if you agree. Support them all you want. You show me a thief , and I bet their a doper...Got no use for any of them.
So, cusss at me when you have no legitimate response, thats fine. I just try to offer real answers when you guys bring up these topics , rather than the pissing and moaning responses that have no foundation...

Excuse me?