Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A bit windy, wouldn't you agree?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Just to back up my point:




    North Texas growth continues as population nears 7 million

    ARLINGTON
    The population in North Texas is nearing 7 million and shows no signs of slowing down, according to annual estimates.

    The 16-county region grew by nearly 97,000 people from January 2014 to January 2015, continuing a trend that began in 2010. The North Central Texas Council of Governments, whose tasks include transportation planning and improving air quality for the region, released its annual population estimates Thursday.

    The region’s population stands at 6,939,250, including 1,244,270 in Dallas and 792,720 in Fort Worth. Fifteen years ago the region had 5.3 million residents.

    “There’s two sides to growth. One side is good because people are voting with their feet and they’re moving to North Texas because of great jobs and great quality of life,” said Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins, who serves on the council’s executive board. “But as those people move here, it gives us challenges — challenges of public health and transportation and education.”

    Dallas and Fort Worth saw the highest number of new residents, with Dallas adding 11,910 people, a 1 percent increase, and Fort Worth adding 11,620 people, a 1.5 percent increase.

    The tiny towns of McLendon-Chisholm (population 2,050) in Rockwall County and Melissa (population 6,890) in Collin County saw the greatest percent change, growing by 17.1 percent and 11.3 percent respectively.

    “It’s a general statement on the economy: Things are picking up again,” said Mike Eastland, the council’s executive director. “We just happen to be that magnet that is drawing a whole lot of business and people to us.”

    The council of governments, which has tracked the region’s population since 1974, goes beyond the census to include local data such as new housing construction permits and the number of occupied single-family and multifamily housing units in each city, said Tim Barbee in research and information services. That data, which also pinpoints where major industrial and commercial activity is happening, helps the council prioritize transportation projects.

    “For us in this agency, it’s very important because we do the transportation planning for the region 20 and 25 years out. We want each year to measure what is happening. We don’t just take a general population and say, ‘Oh, Fort Worth, Dallas or Arlington is this big.’ We start breaking it down into small bits and pieces because we are looking at where road improvements may be needed first,” Eastland said.

    Besides Fort Worth, the biggest gainers in Tarrant County were Arlington (1,300), Mansfield (990), Keller (850) and North Richland Hills (610).

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View Post
      Residential water use is a very small fraction of what gets consumed water wise.
      Originally posted by BradM
      But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
      Originally posted by Leah
      In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

      Comment


      • #48
        Anyone know what comsumes the most water.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by lincolnboy View Post
          Anyone know what comsumes the most water.
          Texas Instruments and Miller Brewing.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by lincolnboy View Post
            Anyone know what comsumes the most water.
            svo
            Originally posted by davbrucas
            I want to like Slow99 since people I know say he's a good guy, but just about everything he posts is condescending and passive aggressive.

            Most people I talk to have nothing but good things to say about you, but you sure come across as a condescending prick. Do you have an inferiority complex you've attempted to overcome through overachievement? Or were you fondled as a child?

            You and slow99 should date. You both have passive aggressiveness down pat.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by bcoop View Post
              Residential water use is a very small fraction of what gets consumed water wise.
              True, but doesn't mean we should waste water irresponsibly IMO. We have a pretty wasteful mentality as a society and it hurts us as a whole.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
                Texas Instruments and Miller Brewing.

                http://trinityrivertexas.org/explore/thirsty/s3_ti.php
                I always thought Miller beer was watered down, this proves it.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                  Residential water use is a very small fraction of what gets consumed water wise.


                  Lawn watering and other outdoor residential uses makes up a significant portion of DFW's water consumption. It also would be one of the easiest areas to reduce consumption if more people would plant native landscapes and attempt to capture their rain run off for watering their gardens.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
                    http://www.twdb.texas.gov/publicatio...port-final.pdf

                    Lawn watering and other outdoor residential uses makes up a significant portion of DFW's water consumption. It also would be one of the easiest areas to reduce consumption if more people would plant native landscapes and attempt to capture their rain run off for watering their gardens.
                    There are articles all over the place with California's drought situation stating that residential use only accounts for 4% of the total consumption.
                    Originally posted by BradM
                    But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                    Originally posted by Leah
                    In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
                      Texas Instruments and Miller Brewing.

                      http://trinityrivertexas.org/explore/thirsty/s3_ti.php
                      Agriculture far exceeds that.
                      Originally posted by BradM
                      But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                      Originally posted by Leah
                      In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                        There are articles all over the place with California's drought situation stating that residential use only accounts for 4% of the total consumption.
                        Beavis's original point wasn't about California nor was it about statewide consumption here, it was based solely on how the population boom is affecting the DFW statistical area.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                          There are articles all over the place with California's drought situation stating that residential use only accounts for 4% of the total consumption.
                          A water economist did an AMA on Reddit not too long ago, and gave the figure as 6%. Either way, SoCal has their act together on lawn watering compared to DFW. Texas needs to water way less. We don't need lawns, and we can use the space we devote to them a lot more efficiently and still have attractive landscaping. I'll agree with you on agriculture, though.
                          ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
                            Beavis's original point wasn't about California nor was it about statewide consumption here, it was based solely on how the population boom is affecting the DFW statistical area.
                            Didn't say it was. I simply made the point that residential water consumption is a drop in the bucket compared to other uses, which you argued.

                            Seems pretty pointless to impose tight restrictions on residential, when total residential consumption pales in comparison to the largest consumers of water. Those efforts would have more meaningful results if they were spent on the largest users of water.
                            Originally posted by BradM
                            But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                            Originally posted by Leah
                            In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by YALE View Post
                              A water economist did an AMA on Reddit not too long ago, and gave the figure as 6%. Either way, SoCal has their act together on lawn watering compared to DFW. Texas needs to water way less. We don't need lawns, and we can use the space we devote to them a lot more efficiently and still have attractive landscaping. I'll agree with you on agriculture, though.
                              I have a suggestion to fix it all:

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                                Didn't say it was. I simply made the point that residential water consumption is a drop in the bucket compared to other uses, which you argued.

                                Seems pretty pointless to impose tight restrictions on residential, when total residential consumption pales in comparison to the largest consumers of water. Those efforts would have more meaningful results if they were spent on the largest users of water.
                                Everyone's talking about north Texas. This is a north Texas site...in north Texas, lawn watering accounts for way more water usage than 4-6%. All you're doing is picking data that fits your argument so you can "win".

                                Everyone else is right with respect to north Texas. If you want to talk about California start another topic, but don't call people wrong and based on data of an entirely different topic.

                                Lawn watering in Texas needs restrictions and there's no doubt about that. People are completely stupid about it and growth has been much too rapid with every new lawn having a sprinkler system.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X