Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

License Plate Reader Technology Looks At Faces

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    i am sure you are already furiously googling as we speak.

    Comment


    • #17
      Lol it doesn't require a google search to know that a small age group with the lowest voter turnout numbers can't be the deciding factor. These are things people or normal intelligence should know.

      So answer the question...do you seriously think it's the young voters that got Obama in?

      Comment


      • #18
        I posted younger voters, learn to read and how to quote. Yes, younger voters got Obama in...twice.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by The King View Post
          I posted younger voters, learn to read and how to quote. Yes, younger voters got Obama in...twice.

          Trying to Weasle out now ehh? Figures...

          Define younger then.

          Comment


          • #20
            Go ahead and Google search to find a convenient age...I'll wait.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by The King View Post
              I posted younger voters, learn to read and how to quote. Yes, younger voters got Obama in...twice.
              When you say younger without any line of demarcation it means absolutely nothing. I can say younger voters made Bush president and make a perfectly valid statement if the line I set is at 60. I don't know the actual data on Bush's first or second term, I was just using it as an example.

              Comment


              • #22
                Standard voter demographics list voters in age groups of 18-29, 30-44, 45-64, and 65+. That is a standard demarcation that anyone can look up. Thus, younger voters make up the first two groups, and older voters make up the latter two groups. The younger voters did indeed elect Obama, both in 2008 and 2012.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Or 18-29 is the group of younger voters, 65+ is the group of older voters, and 30-44 and 45-64 are your middle age groups of voters.
                  Originally posted by Broncojohnny
                  HOORAY ME and FUCK YOU!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by The King View Post
                    Standard voter demographics list voters in age groups of 18-29, 30-44, 45-64, and 65+. That is a standard demarcation that anyone can look up. Thus, younger voters make up the first two groups, and older voters make up the latter two groups. The younger voters did indeed elect Obama, both in 2008 and 2012.
                    So rest of the world would cosnider 18-29 the younger.

                    Given your response, I take it you're over 44?

                    Or do you want to keep crawfishing?

                    When I say younger I mean millennials

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Nash B. View Post
                      Or 18-29 is the group of younger voters, 65+ is the group of older voters, and 30-44 and 45-64 are your middle age groups of voters.
                      Oh

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by The King View Post
                        Oh
                        Reminding us all you're a cop....

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
                          So rest of the world would cosnider 18-29 the younger.

                          Given your response, I take it you're over 44?

                          Or do you want to keep crawfishing?

                          When I say younger I mean millennials
                          Do you want to keep crawfishing? Obviously you are somewhat experienced at attempting to do so.

                          My definition stands with respect to what I posted in regard to younger versus older voters. Whether you agree with it or not hardly puts you in step with "rest of world".

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by The King View Post
                            Do you want to keep crawfishing? Obviously you are somewhat experienced at attempting to do so.

                            My definition stands with respect to what I posted in regard to younger versus older voters. Whether you agree with it or not hardly puts you in step with "rest of world".
                            We all know damn well your definition of younger wast until you googled a demographic breakdown that made you look like less of a moron. Even if it makes you more of a liar.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Where is the rest of this "we" you write of? You are one entertaining "moron" when you get mad, so please do continue.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                You don't have to be both wrong and a liar.

                                The discussion is clearly about the younger generation. That is the mellinnials based on eligible voters. the census also defines way more than 4 groups. Again...showing you're making this shit up as you go.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X