2016 CTS-V: 640hp, 200mph top speed

[Trip McNeely]

When's the Escalade V come out?

[71chevellejohn]

I know exactly what an SS is and I personally really like it, but comparing it to the 2016 CTS-V doesn't make any sense. There are a very large number of differences between the two cars including a big price difference.

Im pretty sure he was referring to the body/chassis being the same as the SS.

[Mach1]

Im pretty sure he was referring to the body/chassis being the same as the SS.

Yep

[Labora]

New CTS-V is sexy.

[Moose242]

Uhh, chief, that is the CTS V Sport. A HUGE difference from this upcoming CTS-V. Not even in the same category. Like 210hp and a crapton of torque and a bunch of other differences.

Hmm. Shit is depressingly slow.

[POSYJ]

No wagon, no care....

I did have a v sport loaner last week. Peppy is best way to describe it and it would be a fun daily, but not at 63k..

[geronimo]

Hmm. Shit is depressingly slow.

I've got a new cts v sport and I wouldn't call it depressingly slow at all, 0-60 is pretty quick.

[CexMashean]

420HP/430TQ @ 3950LBS for the V Sport. Seems like it'd be a solid daily, and probably amazing with a retune to up the boost.

[whitetrash]

I dig it. But am I the only one that thinks it's starting to look like a Benz?

[Gasser64]

This probably won tmake me any friends in this thread but ive been waiting for caddy to do away with that bizzare front end for a while now. Never liked it since their rebirth.

[POSYJ]

i personally like the front end on my V2....not quite sold on the new V3...and regarding the ass end - I've made my opinion know about the lack of 5th door...

[Big A]

For the money I'd rather have a new M3.

[Broncojohnny]

I fuckin love it but the price is probably fully retarded.

[Trip McNeely]

For the money I'd rather have a new M3.

Of course you would, and you're nuts.

[MattB]

Of course you would, and you're nuts.

And you can't compare an M3 to a CTS-V if you want to compare apples to apples.

M3 to ATS-V

M5 to CTS-V

IMO.