Like a lot of these "no knock warrants", you have the word of a meth head who admitted to grand theft auto trying to get a man locked up so he can go back and finish looting. Warrants should NEVER be based on an anonymous informant or a drug head. Ever. If their testimony wouldn't hold up during a trial CX, then it shouldn't be basis for a warrant that, by it's very nature, is violent and results in casualties more often than not.
Tell me, if someone kicks in your door in body armor and points weapons in your face and the face of your wife, are you going to just lay yours down or are you going to engage? I know as a law abiding citizen that if someone kicks in my door, odds are they are bad guys and I am within my rights to remove them.
Tell me, if someone kicks in your door in body armor and points weapons in your face and the face of your wife, are you going to just lay yours down or are you going to engage? I know as a law abiding citizen that if someone kicks in my door, odds are they are bad guys and I am within my rights to remove them.
Comment