Originally posted by ftp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
mike brown vs. eric garner
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ftp View PostAll of this over the man selling a loose ciggarette, it's sad what has happened to this country.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dcs13 View PostYeah, don't let facts get in the way. When facts don't work on the side of your argument, start calling names and foul... That's one of the problems with some of you guys. Can't have an adult conversation with actual opinions.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
Originally posted by YALE View PostTell me again why he needed to be arrested in the first place. I still don't see it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by YALE View PostTell me again why he needed to be arrested in the first place. I still don't see it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by juiceweezl View PostJust because you disagree with a law doesn't mean it shouldn't be upheld. I think the speed limit on the tollway should be 85, but that doesn't mean I can go that without risk of a ticket...Last edited by jluv; 12-04-2014, 10:34 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by juiceweezl View PostJust because you disagree with a law doesn't mean it shouldn't be upheld. I think the speed limit on the tollway should be 85, but that doesn't mean I can go that without risk of a ticket...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by juiceweezl View PostJust because you disagree with a law doesn't mean it shouldn't be upheld. I think the speed limit on the tollway should be 85, but that doesn't mean I can go that without risk of a ticket...ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sean88gt View PostDon't spout terms if you don't know what they mean.
"...
Criminal negligence." A person acts with criminal negligence with
respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining
an offense when he fails to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable
risk that such result will occur or that such circumstance exists. The
risk must be of such nature and degree that the failure to perceive it
constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a
reasonable person would observe in the situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dcs13 View PostHere is what NY has a Negligence. We're talking Criminal here, not civil. They going to lose a civil case. But for a grand jury to file charges they have to say he at least was negligent. You tell me where it fits under here:
Criminal negligence." A person acts with criminal negligence with
respect to a result or to a circumstance described by a statute defining
an offense when he fails to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable
risk that such result will occur or that such circumstance exists. The
risk must be of such nature and degree that the failure to perceive it
constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a
reasonable person would observe in the situation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jluv View PostBut you can certainly go 85 on the tollway without risk of being arrested, bullied by several aggressive cops, choked, thrown to the ground, killed, etc. Well, at least in theory.
god bless.It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men -Frederick Douglass
Comment
-
Originally posted by Denny View PostIt came into play with Mr. Garner gasping and saying that he couldn't breathe... repeatedly. The hold could have loosened once he was on the ground and other officers on scene.
Comment
Comment