Custody Battle / Morality Clause

[racrguy]

I made sure it was in my divorce, NO overnight guests that are not family. I don't give a shit who she might be screwing but I do give a shit if she is doing it around my daughter

So it was cool that you were screwing her around your daughter, but nobody else can? Seems a bit hypocritical to me.

[YALE]

Would any of you alphapha bro dudes that want a morality clause accept the same clause against you?

[GE]

One of my female friends had it in their divorce decree. They both abided by it for a long long time but I think after many years they both ended up doing it.

[bcoop]

I also think they are bullshit. A way to control your ex even though you lost control of the relationship. I also agree with Sean in that they aren't going to stop anything like abuse. That doesn't even make sense imo.

To each their own, I suppose.

[gearjammer351]

Very odd first post...

That's what I thought, too.

[lowthreeohz]

Sallen79 = Saleen779?

[Baron Von Crowder]

I also think they are bullshit. A way to control your ex even though you lost control of the relationship. I also agree with Sean in that they aren't going to stop anything like abuse. That doesn't even make sense imo.

To each their own, I suppose.

perhaps it's with the best interest of the kid in mind. Kids generally have a hard time figuring out how life works again with their parents divorce, maybe watching mommy having a revolving door on her bedroom isnt the best thing for them?

[Mike]

I'm glad I don't have a kid.

[bcoop]

perhaps it's with the best interest of the kid in mind. Kids generally have a hard time figuring out how life works again with their parents divorce, maybe watching mommy having a revolving door on her bedroom isnt the best thing for them?

I don't disagree with that, but this is going to do very little to stop it, really. That would be best handled as teaching opportunity by the non offending parent, imo.

[69gto]

So it was cool that you were screwing her around your daughter, but nobody else can? Seems a bit hypocritical to me.

easy there, it has been almost 2 years since the divorce, I am not interested in dating again until the kids are at least in college (my son is 20 already he was not a factor in the divorce) they are what is important to me. besides the screwing I got in court will last me long enough.

[90MarkVII]

First of all, it's bullshit unless BOTH parents are equally restricted...in writing.
What's good for the goose.....
So while Daddy wants to make certain Mommy does not have fuck buddies over for the night, Daddy should follow the same rules. "Honey, Daddy is in here studying with Bambi, OK?"
No.

PLUS, what's the punishment?
Loss of custody?
Loss of support?
Maybe a fine per incident?
I know, charge her $100 if she only blew him, but $200 if she actually fucked.
$300 if it was anal.

AND, how to enforce? Cameras to be installed in her bedroom? Call her up and ask if she fucked someone within 100 ft of the child?

Get real.

[bcoop]

First of all, it's bullshit unless BOTH parents are equally restricted...in writing.
What's good for the goose.....
So while Daddy wants to make certain Mommy does not have fuck buddies over for the night, Daddy should follow the same rules. "Honey, Daddy is in here studying with Bambi, OK?"
No.

PLUS, what's the punishment?
Loss of custody?
Loss of support?
Maybe a fine per incident?
I know, charge her $100 if she only blew him, but $200 if she actually fucked.
$300 if it was anal.

AND, how to enforce? Cameras to be installed in her bedroom? Call her up and ask if she fucked someone within 100 ft of the child?

Get real.

Exactly. The way I understand it though, they do work both ways. It isn't exclusive to one party. They are nearly impossible to enforce. You'd basically have to stalk said ex, or depend on your kid to relay info to you. And is that what you want? To teach your kids how to be a snooping, nosy little bastard?

Nobody wants to see a revolving door. I get that. But this is ridiculous. You'd have to take it back to court again, even if you had actual physical evidence, which means more $ out of pocket. A judge will laugh you out of the courtroom on a kid's word alone. And even with evidence, the punishment would be absolutely minimal except in extreme cases. If there is even any punishment at all

[yellowstang]

Exactly. The way I understand it though, they do work both ways. It isn't exclusive to one party. They are nearly impossible to enforce. You'd basically have to stalk said ex, or depend on your kid to relay info to you. And is that what you want? To teach your kids how to be a snooping, nosy little bastard?

Nobody wants to see a revolving door. I get that. But this is ridiculous. You'd have to take it back to court again, even if you had actual physical evidence, which means more $ out of pocket. A judge will laugh you out of the courtroom on a kid's word alone. And even with evidence, the punishment would be absolutely minimal except in extreme cases. If there is even any punishment at all

Sneak the boy/girlfriend in/out the bedroom windows. Problem solved!

[Sean88gt]

Attorneys won't/shouldn't post answers publicly, due to sanctions and what not.

So spend the money and get one, instead of asking for advice on a Mustang forum.

[racrguy]

easy there, it has been almost 2 years since the divorce, I am not interested in dating again until the kids are at least in college (my son is 20 already he was not a factor in the divorce) they are what is important to me. besides the screwing I got in court will last me long enough.

Everything you said is irrelevant. It was ok for you to have sex with her in the household, but nobody else can. That is supremely hypocritical, even if you're bound by the same rules.