I see 8.5-9.1 depending on temps and traction on a mostly stock 2nd Gen Lightning.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lightning versus new F150
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Chili View PostWhat's a stock 99 run? I'm seeing mid 13's in the 1/4 on google.Originally posted by Da PrezFuck dfwstangs!! If Jose ain't running it, I won't even bother going back to it, just my two cents!!Originally posted by VETTKLR
Cliff Notes: I can beat the fuck out of a ZR1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diabolic View PostAnd I wasn't suggesting he push 20 pounds. If he's considering a 2004 then warranty isn't a deciding factor. Gen 1st are becoming more valuable and can handle 14#'s stock, run high 12's, get better mileage than a 2nd gen and the engine is far more durable. A Gen 1 with an exhaust and a well setup S-Trim will blow away a new Tremor, Ecoboost, or 5.0 F150. Just offering another option.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Magnus View PostRoofing nails from 1974 maybe.Originally posted by Chili View PostWhat's a stock 99 run? I'm seeing mid 13's in the 1/4 on google.
It runs 8.9-9.0 in the heat with a 13.9-14.1 qtr. Not a god damn thing done to it. Even stock GY tires. Im down to race some stock trucks for research of course... has 72 k miles, faded roof and hail damage. lmao
Best dyno was 339/476 rw... think the tq was a spike but the truck tried to rip the straps off on the hit lol
Comment
Comment