Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My sons 1st shot !!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by VaderTT View Post
    My 3 year old chugged about 3 fingers of Gentleman’s Jack thinking it was water.
    Instant freakout!
    My little brother drank a high-ball glass of scotch on the rocks when he was two, and was completely unfazed. My uncle uncle remarked, "y'all are gonna be bailing that boy out of jail."
    ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

    Comment


    • #17
      Her first mistake was she let the police and DSHS into her house. I would bet they didn’t have a warrant. Second mistake is she spoke to them without a lawyer. That got her thrown in jail.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by cyclonescott View Post
        Her first mistake was she let the police and DSHS into her house. I would bet they didn’t have a warrant. Second mistake is she spoke to them without a lawyer. That got her thrown in jail.
        Being a moron got her arrested.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by cyclonescott View Post
          Her first mistake was she let the police and DSHS into her house. I would bet they didn’t have a warrant. Second mistake is she spoke to them without a lawyer. That got her thrown in jail.
          That is PC to enter the house. She literally provided evidence against herself. You have got to be one of the densest cocksuckers since Dan Bishop. Please don't breed.
          ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

          Comment


          • #20
            She could've said it was apple juice and a joke, but that bitch is a real fucking dunce.

            Comment


            • #21
              I like the Fireball whiskey.
              2015 F250 Platinum

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by YALE View Post
                That is PC to enter the house. She literally provided evidence against herself. You have got to be one of the densest cocksuckers since Dan Bishop. Please don't breed.


                CPS Social Workers need a warrant to enter your home

                In order for an officer of the court** to enter your home against your will, be it a social worker or police officer, he or she must have a warrant in their hand when they step through your door. If someone has evidence that you have committed a crime, such evidence must be presented to a judge, while under oath or affirmation, and the judge must decide whether that evidence contains sufficient “probable cause” for issuance of a warrant.

                Comment


                • #23
                  I can't stand Fireball, every time someone orders a round of that crap I turn it down and just walk away if they keep insisting.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by cyclonescott View Post
                    http://fightchildprotectiveservices....-at-your-door/

                    CPS Social Workers need a warrant to enter your home

                    In order for an officer of the court** to enter your home against your will, be it a social worker or police officer, he or she must have a warrant in their hand when they step through your door. If someone has evidence that you have committed a crime, such evidence must be presented to a judge, while under oath or affirmation, and the judge must decide whether that evidence contains sufficient “probable cause” for issuance of a warrant.
                    Those still aren't police officers, which is why they make the distinction, "officers of the court." Try again, you simple bastard.
                    ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by 69gto View Post
                      old enough to taze but not old enough to drink
                      Quoted for solid fact lol.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by YALE View Post
                        Those still aren't police officers, which is why they make the distinction, "officers of the court." Try again, you simple bastard.
                        How about the case law.

                        [It is] settled constitutional law that ... police could not enter a dwelling without a warrant even under statutory authority where probable cause existed. The principle that government officials cannot coerce entry into people's houses without a search warrant ... is so well established that any reasonable officer would know it.

                        Appellants' claim, that "a search warrant is not required for home investigatory visits by social workers," is simply not the law.

                        [N]owhere is the protective force of the fourth amendment more powerful than it is when the sanctity of the home is involved. & Therefore, we have been adamant in our demand that absent exigent circumstances a warrant will be required before a person's home is invaded by the authorities."

                        Case law: Calabretta v Floyd 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 1999)

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Unicorn Jeff View Post
                          My fiance loves that Fireball stuff. I can't stand it!
                          When it gets cold, try a shot of it in a mug of hot apple cider. Damn good..

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by cyclonescott View Post
                            How about the case law.

                            [It is] settled constitutional law that ... police could not enter a dwelling without a warrant even under statutory authority where probable cause existed. The principle that government officials cannot coerce entry into people's houses without a search warrant ... is so well established that any reasonable officer would know it.

                            Appellants' claim, that "a search warrant is not required for home investigatory visits by social workers," is simply not the law.

                            [N]owhere is the protective force of the fourth amendment more powerful than it is when the sanctity of the home is involved. & Therefore, we have been adamant in our demand that absent exigent circumstances a warrant will be required before a person's home is invaded by the authorities."

                            Case law: Calabretta v Floyd 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 1999)
                            Ok. We'll do it your way. Here's what appears to be the decision-making process of the officer in question:
                            Originally posted by self-defeating citation
                            The police officer had the opinion that in any check on the welfare of children “there is an exigent circumstance” so no search warrant is needed.
                            The reason that case is irrelevant to this one is, she put a fucking picture up on facebook of her son taking a shot. There is no search warrant necessary, because there's no search. All a cop would have to do is then go to the door and ask if that was alcohol. If she replied in the affirmative, he could then arrest her, never having made entry into her home. Or, if you like, the officer in question could've asked politely to be let in, and conducted the same interview. Again, no search warrant is necessary, because there was no search. Cops don't have to get warrants for crimes they watch you commit.
                            ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              They had PC to get a warrant to enter (if necessary) and arrest her, but PC alone does not grant them the right to enter the residence unless officers are present at the time of a criminal act, or there is an admission of such act by the accused.

                              Edit: nevermind you got it

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Go back and do some more research on what constitutes “exigent circumstance” and you will see where you are wrong. I know it is hard for narcissist like yourself to admit you are wrong, but it does happen.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X