Originally posted by VaderTT
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
My sons 1st shot !!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by cyclonescott View PostHer first mistake was she let the police and DSHS into her house. I would bet they didn’t have a warrant. Second mistake is she spoke to them without a lawyer. That got her thrown in jail.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
Originally posted by YALE View PostThat is PC to enter the house. She literally provided evidence against herself. You have got to be one of the densest cocksuckers since Dan Bishop. Please don't breed.
CPS Social Workers need a warrant to enter your home
In order for an officer of the court** to enter your home against your will, be it a social worker or police officer, he or she must have a warrant in their hand when they step through your door. If someone has evidence that you have committed a crime, such evidence must be presented to a judge, while under oath or affirmation, and the judge must decide whether that evidence contains sufficient “probable cause” for issuance of a warrant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cyclonescott View Posthttp://fightchildprotectiveservices....-at-your-door/
CPS Social Workers need a warrant to enter your home
In order for an officer of the court** to enter your home against your will, be it a social worker or police officer, he or she must have a warrant in their hand when they step through your door. If someone has evidence that you have committed a crime, such evidence must be presented to a judge, while under oath or affirmation, and the judge must decide whether that evidence contains sufficient “probable cause” for issuance of a warrant.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
Originally posted by YALE View PostThose still aren't police officers, which is why they make the distinction, "officers of the court." Try again, you simple bastard.
[It is] settled constitutional law that ... police could not enter a dwelling without a warrant even under statutory authority where probable cause existed. The principle that government officials cannot coerce entry into people's houses without a search warrant ... is so well established that any reasonable officer would know it.
Appellants' claim, that "a search warrant is not required for home investigatory visits by social workers," is simply not the law.
[N]owhere is the protective force of the fourth amendment more powerful than it is when the sanctity of the home is involved. & Therefore, we have been adamant in our demand that absent exigent circumstances a warrant will be required before a person's home is invaded by the authorities."
Case law: Calabretta v Floyd 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 1999)
Comment
-
Originally posted by cyclonescott View PostHow about the case law.
[It is] settled constitutional law that ... police could not enter a dwelling without a warrant even under statutory authority where probable cause existed. The principle that government officials cannot coerce entry into people's houses without a search warrant ... is so well established that any reasonable officer would know it.
Appellants' claim, that "a search warrant is not required for home investigatory visits by social workers," is simply not the law.
[N]owhere is the protective force of the fourth amendment more powerful than it is when the sanctity of the home is involved. & Therefore, we have been adamant in our demand that absent exigent circumstances a warrant will be required before a person's home is invaded by the authorities."
Case law: Calabretta v Floyd 189 F.3d 808 (9th Cir. 1999)
Originally posted by self-defeating citationThe police officer had the opinion that in any check on the welfare of children “there is an exigent circumstance” so no search warrant is needed.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
Comment