Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Russian bombers at it again...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Russian bombers at it again...



    Whiskey
    Tango
    Foxtrot

    September 8, 2014 5:00 am

    Two Russian strategic bombers conducted practice cruise missile attacks on the United States during a training mission last week that defense officials say appeared timed to the NATO summit in Wales.

    The Russian Tu-95 Bear bombers were tracked flying a route across the northern Atlantic near Iceland, Greenland, and Canada’s northeast.

    Analysis of the flight indicated the aircraft were conducting practice runs to a pre-determined “launch box”—an optimum point for firing nuclear-armed cruise missiles at U.S. targets, said defense officials familiar with intelligence reports.

    Disclosure of the nuclear bombing practice comes as a Russian general last week called for Moscow to change its doctrine to include preemptive nuclear strikes on the United States and NATO.

    Gen. Yuri Yakubov, a senior Defense Ministry official, was quoted by the state-run Interfax news agency as saying that Russia’s 2010 military doctrine should be revised to identify the United States and the NATO alliance as enemies, and clearly outline the conditions for a preemptive nuclear strike against them.

    Yakubov said among other needed doctrinal changes, “it is necessary to hash out the conditions under which Russia could carry out a preemptive strike with the Russian Strategic Rocket Forces”—Moscow’s nuclear forces.

    The practice bombing runs are the latest in a series of incidents involving threatening Russian bomber flights near the United States. Analysts say the bomber flights are nuclear saber-rattling by Moscow as a result of heightened tensions over the crisis in Ukraine.

    A spokesman for the U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command declined to comment on the bomber flights in the North Atlantic.

    No U.S. or Canadian fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the Bear-H bombers since the aircraft stayed outside the North American Air Defense Identification Zone.

    Additional details of the incident that took place over the Labrador Sea, the stretch of the Atlantic between Greenland and Canada’s Labrador Peninsula, could not be learned.

    However, officials said it took place during the NATO summit in Wales that was held Thursday and Friday.

    The summit statement criticized “Russia’s aggressive actions against Ukraine [which] have fundamentally challenged our vision of a Europe whole, free, and at peace.”

    In response to Russia’s actions, the alliance agreed to create a new Very High Readiness Joint Task Force in Eastern Europe that can deploy military forces in days.

    “If required, they will also facilitate reinforcement of allies located at NATO’s periphery for deterrence and collective defense,” the NATO statement said.

    U.S. Army troops will lead an international military exercise inside western Ukraine later this month. The exercises, known as “Rapid Trident 2014,” will begin Sept. 15 and include troops from several NATO and NATO-partner states, including Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Canada, Georgia, Germany, Britain, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Norway, Poland, Romania, Spain, and the United States.

    Russian nuclear forces will conduct a large-scale exercise in mid-September, state news agencies reported.

    The Tu-95 is a nuclear-capable bomber that is outfitted with six AS-15 nuclear-armed cruise missiles. The missiles have a range of over 1,800 miles.

    Google Earth analysis reveals that a Tu-95 launch box located in the Labrador Sea and firing AS-15 missiles would be in range of Ottawa, New York, Washington, and Chicago, and could reach as far south as the Norfolk Naval base.

    However, air-launched cruise missiles fired from that location and outside the air defense identification zone would be unable to reach Kings Bay, Georgia—the homeport for U.S. ballistic missile submarines and a key strategic nuclear target.

    Mark Schneider, a former Pentagon strategic policymaker and currently senior analyst at the National Institute for Public Policy, said Russian leaders frequently issue public nuclear threats because they regard their nuclear arsenal as the main element of their great power status.

    “Putin began what he called bomber ‘combat patrols’ in 2007 and they continue,” Schneider said. “They are designed to intimidate as well as practice nuclear bomber attacks.”

    Schneider said that since the Ukraine crisis triggered by Moscow’s military annexation of Crimea, “there have been substantial numbers of all types of standard Russian nuclear threats.”

    He said the threats have included nuclear exercises, bomber flights, and public statements, including Putin’s suggestion that NATO ‘not mess with us’ because Moscow remains a nuclear power.

    Northern Command has confirmed that Russian strategic bomber flights increased sharply over the past six months.

    Last month, at least 16 bomber incursions by the Russians took place within the northwestern U.S. and Canadian air defense zones over a period 10 days. It was the largest number of incursions since the end of the Cold War. U.S. fighter jets intercepted the Russian aircraft and followed them until they exited the defense zone.

    In June, Russian bombers flew over the arctic prompting intercepts by Canadian fighters on two occasions. The Canadian government called the stepped up bomber flights a “strategic message” from Moscow amid heightened tensions.

    And on June 20, the Russian Defense Ministry announced the test launch of six AS-15 missiles from a Bear bomber during military exercises.

    That same month, on June 9, two Russian Bear bombers flew within 50 miles of the California coast in the closest strategic bomber flights near a U.S. coast since the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

    Admiral Cecil Haney, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, which is in charge of nuclear forces, said last month that he is concerned both by large-scale Russian nuclear exercises and by increased bomber flights near the United States.

    “Clearly, we at the U.S. Strategic Command do monitor the strategic environment,” Haney said noting large-scale nuclear exercises during the Ukraine crisis.

    “Any nation state has the right to train,” he added. “It’s just interesting how that information [on nuclear forces exercises] is readily available on YouTube. Clearly, the actions associated with Ukraine are problematic.”

    On long-range strategic aircraft flights, Haney said: “I will say that the business of them coming close to the United States of America, we take very seriously.”

  • #2
    Maybe we should leave Russia the fuck alone.
    ازدهار رأسه برعشيت

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by matts5.0 View Post
      Maybe we should leave Russia the fuck alone.
      That's why they are doing it, to see if we will back down. They aren't going to fire one, they know we will level their entire country. If this were to go down, there will be no winner. In nuclear war we all lose.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well boys and girls...Looks like its back to the early 80s again...The threat of nuclear war at our doorstep

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by black50 View Post
          Well boys and girls...Looks like its back to the early 80s again...The threat of nuclear war at our doorstep
          All it took was a weak POTUS up against a hardened former KGB
          boss to bring it all back. Obammy never tood a chance.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by blownaltered View Post
            They aren't going to fire one, they know we will level their entire country
            You sure about this? MAD is what keeps us safe, and I'm not so sure that our current POTUS has the balls to follow through with it.

            If we had a POTUS with some balls then he should be parking every ballistic nuclear sub we have at their coast lines

            Comment


            • #7
              The POTUS could, but won't, simply say we're doing the same thing with B2's. We don't even have to actually do it, just move them around every so often. Just say our bomber's have never had any issues with being intercepted by the Russians. That would jack with them a bit..

              Comment


              • #8
                And we still dont' have any bombers on alert anywhere. Our force has shrunk and our president is more worried about a fucking virus in the jungles of Africa.

                In case you younger crown has forgotten the drills.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Obama has been steadily reducing our nuclear stockpile and trusting Russia to do the same while refusing to invest in updating our weapons.

                  If we get struck, and Russia hits a red state, can you imagine Obama talking about how it is a good thing because the dispersal of ash will help combat global warming?
                  I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
                    Originally posted by lincolnboy
                    After watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      ^ WOPR approves.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DOHCTR View Post
                        A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
                        Originally posted by lowthreeohz View Post
                        ^ WOPR approves.
                        Win.
                        "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DOHCTR View Post
                          A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
                          That's actually the core strategy behind MAD. It's a single-pass scenario akin to the Prisoner's Dilemma.
                          ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                            Obama has been steadily reducing our nuclear stockpile and trusting Russia to do the same while refusing to invest in updating our weapons.

                            If we get struck, and Russia hits a red state, can you imagine Obama talking about how it is a good thing because the dispersal of ash will help combat global warming?
                            If you think for one second that we don't have enough to destroy the world a few times over you're absolutely insane.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              LMAO about those old clunkers actually being a threat.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X