Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Statutory Rape Victim Forced to Pay Child Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Statutory Rape Victim Forced to Pay Child Support

    Slow news day, I guess. I found this interesting for a variety of reasons.

    Originally posted by BradM
    But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
    Originally posted by Leah
    In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

  • #2
    Lol... He's 24 and the kid is 6? He was 18 when she had the baby so.... Whats the problem

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Unicorn Jeff View Post
      Lol... He's 24 and the kid is 6? He was 18 when she had the baby so.... Whats the problem
      Reading isn't your strong suit, is it? The kid was 6 when he found out he had a child. He was 14 when he had sex with the 20 year old.
      Originally posted by BradM
      But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
      Originally posted by Leah
      In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

      Comment


      • #4
        Seems to me like they are saying, in a way, that you signed a legal bind agreement prior to being legally able to do so. Not sure how that works exactly.
        "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."
        -Gerald Ford/Thomas Jefferson

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by bcoop View Post
          Reading isn't your strong suit, is it? The kid was 6 when he found out he had a child. He was 14 when he had sex with the 20 year old.
          True, skim reading is they suck, but I'm using some brain power and I'm guessing he was 16 when he got her pregnant?

          Comment


          • #6
            He was a willing participant, he wasn't raped. I read the article and it seems the only reason he is bringing up the fact he was under age, is to try to get out of child support. I bet that fucker has been bragging about screwing a 20 year old when he was 14 since the day it happened. Don't feel sorry for this dude at all.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by blownaltered View Post
              He was a willing participant, he wasn't raped. I read the article and it seems the only reason he is bringing up the fact he was under age, is to try to get out of child support. I bet that fucker has been bragging about screwing a 20 year old when he was 14 since the day it happened. Don't feel sorry for this dude at all.
              Willing or not, a crime was still committed by the woman, therefore negating any of his responsibility to the kid. Greedy slut had unprotected sex with a minor and then goes after him years later? Not a chance.

              He's got a good case.

              Comment


              • #8
                [quote=blownaltered;1358419] He was a willing participant, he wasn't raped./QUOTE]


                Willing or not, that isn't what the law says.


                Originally posted by blownaltered View Post
                I read the article and it seems the only reason he is bringing up the fact he was under age, is to try to get out of child support. I bet that fucker has been bragging about screwing a 20 year old when he was 14 since the day it happened. Don't feel sorry for this dude at all.

                The rest of this post reaks of jealousy. Seriously.

                It's an interesting subject. The legal aspect, the fact that she hid it from him, etc. I don't get the feeling that he is trying to get out of it. He even said he grew up in a single parent home, and doesn't want that for his child. It appears he has been denied access to the child, and if that is indeed the case, you wouldn't want to pay either. And how would you react if some chick from 10 years ago looks you up to tell you that you are a father?
                Originally posted by BradM
                But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                Originally posted by Leah
                In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Baba Ganoush View Post
                  He's got a good case.
                  But he doesn't. Legal precedent isn't favorable for him.
                  Originally posted by BradM
                  But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                  Originally posted by Leah
                  In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
                    But he doesn't. Legal precedent isn't favorable for him.
                    Yeah that's unfortunately true, but I'd still fight it. Family court is a freaky place, anything could happen.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They do that shit to him but cannot make my sons birth giver pay a nickel .. Wtf

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        $380 a month? Suck it up I'm paying twice that.
                        Non tapatalk Sig so the butt hurt va-JJs can stop crying about not being able to turn it off.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by coley View Post
                          They do that shit to him but cannot make my sons birth giver pay a nickel .. Wtf
                          It is different if the "irresponsible" party has a vagina.
                          Originally posted by racrguy
                          What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                          Originally posted by racrguy
                          Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                            It is different if the "irresponsible" party has a vagina.
                            Especially in the great state of TX.
                            Originally posted by BradM
                            But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                            Originally posted by Leah
                            In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              [quote=bcoop;1358427]
                              Originally posted by blownaltered View Post
                              He was a willing participant, he wasn't raped./QUOTE]


                              Willing or not, that isn't what the law says.





                              The rest of this post reaks of jealousy. Seriously.

                              It's an interesting subject. The legal aspect, the fact that she hid it from him, etc. I don't get the feeling that he is trying to get out of it. He even said he grew up in a single parent home, and doesn't want that for his child. It appears he has been denied access to the child, and if that is indeed the case, you wouldn't want to pay either. And how would you react if some chick from 10 years ago looks you up to tell you that you are a father?
                              Not a hint of jealousy, just stating the obvious. He didn't file rape charges because there was no rape. Me personally I would be pissed about paying back child support on a kid I didn't know about. That is a something that I believe should be changed. As for him having to pay child support from now on, hell yes he should have to.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X