Originally posted by Magnus
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
1971 Mach 1 value?
Collapse
X
-
Let me make the one above look a lot better for everyone. Almost looks like an El Camino had sex with a Torino!....
70' Chevelle RagTop
(Forever Under Construction)
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.”- Thomas A Edison
Comment
-
Originally posted by GrayStangGT View PostI'm not saying a 70 doesn't look better than a 71-73, but I've never understood the hate for the later ones. They are still a cool car. Now 74, that is a whole other story.
From Wiki:
The first generation Mustangs grew in size; the 1973 model had become markedly larger than the original model. The pony car market segment saw decreasing sales in the early-1970s "with many buyers turning to lower-priced, fuel-efficient compacts like Ford's own Maverick - a huge first-year success itself."[3] The Mustang was growing to become an intermediate-sized sedan, "too big and alienated many in its customer base."[4] The allure of the original Mustang was its trim size and concept. The automakers in Detroit had "begun to receive vibrations from the only source it really listens to — new-car buyers... The message: Build smaller cars" as customers stopped buying and the inventory of unsold new cars climbed during the summer of 1973, and there were already positive market expectations for the new downsized Mustang.[5] Automakers were "scrambling" by December 1973 as "the trend toward smaller, less extravagant cars to surge ahead faster than anyone had expected.""If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford
Comment
-
Originally posted by Magnus View PostOnly 1 year off from looking so much better.
Yes it's a huge, bloated car compared to the '65 fastback, but this car more than holds its own in the styling department - especially the '71 in Boss and Mach 1 guise. The '71 Boss 351 was the quickest Mustang of all time until the '95 Cobra R.
And to be fair, the Mustang wasn't the only car saddled ugly bumpers and weak performance for '72.
When the government pays, the government controls.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GrayStangGT View PostI'm not saying a 70 doesn't look better than a 71-73, but I've never understood the hate for the later ones. They are still a cool car. Now 74, that is a whole other story.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostI love the '64-70 cars - a lot - but the '71-73 fastback body style is incredibly handsome in my opinion.
Yes it's a huge, bloated car compared to the '65 fastback, but this car more than holds its own in the styling department - especially the '71 in Boss and Mach 1 guise. The '71 Boss 351 was the quickest Mustang of all time until the '95 Cobra R.
And to be fair, the Mustang wasn't the only car saddled ugly bumpers and weak performance for '72
Though I like the 71 - 73 rag tops.
Comment
-
I always liked the 71-73 cars for some reason. They do have the biggest engine bay of the classics too. A lot of the older big block cars were a bitch to work on. I like the australian cars of that vintage a lot more.Originally posted by racrguyWhat's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?Originally posted by racrguyVoting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baron Von Crowder View PostMy buddy is looking at one that his great uncle or someone extended family has and needs to sell it pretty quick.
he's the second owner, 98k miles on it, mach 1, 351 cleveland, automatic. Original condition, one repaint factory color roughly 12 years ago. Ive yet to see it in person, supposed to run and drive well, its been kept in the garage and driven lightly the last 10 or so years. What is a roundabout number on what these are worth? I've honestly never paid any attention to the 71-73 cars.
pics:
Comment
Comment