Originally posted by DON SVO
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Awesome treatment for burn victims
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by davbrucas View PostDude, they're liberals...that is their M.O.Originally posted by PGreenCobraI can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!Originally posted by Trip McNeelyOriginally posted by dsrtuckteezydont downshift!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DON SVO View PostI don't really care what their political situation is, Dave, staunch stances that are imposed by sheer ignorance is fucking ridiculous. If you're going to attempt a pot shot at G Dub, at least make sure you don't seem like a complete moron when you do it.
Comment
-
...
Here is a cut from Wikipedia. George's change wasn't a ban, but a restriction on embryonic stem cells, which wouldn't apply in this case. It was still a restriction on stem cell research, no matter which way you cut it.
My point is that some of you guys are so fuckin sensitive to any negative commnets about George that you get your panties in a wad over the smallest thing. Then, you start your name calling, like a bunch of 5 years olds. Give me a fucking break.
Stem cell researchBush supported adult stem cell research and umbilical cord blood stem cell research. However, Bush opposed any new embryonic stem cell research, and had limited the federal funding of existing research. Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research was first approved under President Bill Clinton on January 19, 1999,[13] but no money was to be spent until the guidelines were published. The guidelines were released under Clinton on August 23, 2000.[14] They allowed use of unused frozen embryos. On August 9, 2001, before any funding was granted under these guidelines, Bush announced modifications to the guidelines to allow use of only existing stem cell lines.[15] While Bush claimed that more than 60 embryonic stem cell lines already existed from privately funded research, scientists in 2003 said there were only 11 usable lines, and in 2005 that all lines approved for Federal funding are contaminated and unusable.[16] Adult stem cell funding was not restricted and was supported by President Bush as a more viable means of research.
Comment
-
Originally posted by line-em-up View PostHere is a cut from Wikipedia. George's change wasn't a ban, but a restriction on embryonic stem cells, which wouldn't apply in this case. It was still a restriction on stem cell research, no matter which way you cut it.
My point is that some of you guys are so fuckin sensitive to any negative commnets about George that you get your panties in a wad over the smallest thing. Then, you start your name calling, like a bunch of 5 years olds. Give me a fucking break.
W opposed embryonic stem cell research based on the basic necessity of the research: unborn fetuses. This is a horse of a different color and trying to drag W into it is asinine.Originally posted by PGreenCobraI can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!Originally posted by Trip McNeelyOriginally posted by dsrtuckteezydont downshift!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by line-em-up View PostI make one somewhat negative comment and I'm a liberal? How bout you go fuck yourself. I have been watching people own you left and right and I haven't said a word. You need to get a life dude.
My statement wasnt meant as a personal attack...just stirring the pot. Dont take shit so damn personal, man.
I have no idea if you are liberal or not...heck, I cant remember ever discussing politics with you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by John -- '02 HAWK View Posthttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n4853385.shtml
The ruling said the stay on an order by a federal judge last month was temporary and gave both sides until Sept. 20 to file written arguments in the case.
nope never a ban of any kindOriginally posted by line-em-up View PostThanks. That saved me from digging it up. It's funny how people's memories are so selective.
So let's go over the actual facts here:
1. Federal funding of Stem Cell research DIDN'T EXIST before the Bush administration. They created it to begin with. Bush only limited what the funding can be used for (those original 21 stem cell lines). Limiting how federal money can be used in research is NOT A BAN.
2. The restriction on federal funding covered EMBRYONIC stem cell research and ONLY embryonic stem cell research.
3. There was no ban on private funding of stem cell research period. Anyone could do that research on any stem cell line that they wanted as long as they weren't taking tax payer money.
4. This treatment has nothing to do with EMBRYONIC stem cell research. As Don correctly points out, this treatment was done with stem cells from an ADULT.
5. This research was in development BEFORE President Obama lifted restrictions on federal funding.
Frankly I'm OK with Obama lifting the restriction. There has never been any evidence that stem cell lines were coming from abortion.
Additionally, partly due to the Bush administration's restrictions, scientist learned that they could do a lot of things with adult stem cells. Necessity is the mother of invention.
Comment
-
your right it was an outright ban. It just wasnt permited or the funding was removed as to create ban with out using the word. But oddly enough the media did thus two easy googled articles on a non-ban
oh look "The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (H.R. 810) was the first bill ever vetoed by United States President George W. Bush, more than five years after his inauguration. The bill, which passed both houses of Congress, but by less than the two-thirds majority needed to override the veto, would have allowed federal funding of stem cell research on new lines of stem cells derived from discarded human embryos created for fertility treatments."
Cause god forgive you do something with the miscarried cells your mother told you to drive to the hospital with
Comment
-
Originally posted by John -- '02 HAWK View Posthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell_laws
your right it was an outright ban. It just wasnt permited or the funding was removed as to create ban with out using the word. But oddly enough the media did thus two easy googled articles on a non-ban
oh look "The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (H.R. 810) was the first bill ever vetoed by United States President George W. Bush, more than five years after his inauguration. The bill, which passed both houses of Congress, but by less than the two-thirds majority needed to override the veto, would have allowed federal funding of stem cell research on new lines of stem cells derived from discarded human embryos created for fertility treatments."
Cause god forgive you do something with the miscarried cells your mother told you to drive to the hospital with
I'm gonna keep beating you over the head with this until you stop sounding like a moron.Originally posted by PGreenCobraI can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!Originally posted by Trip McNeelyOriginally posted by dsrtuckteezydont downshift!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by John -- '02 HAWK View Posthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell_laws
your right it was an outright ban. It just wasnt permited or the funding was removed as to create ban with out using the word. But oddly enough the media did thus two easy googled articles on a non-ban
oh look "The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (H.R. 810) was the first bill ever vetoed by United States President George W. Bush, more than five years after his inauguration. The bill, which passed both houses of Congress, but by less than the two-thirds majority needed to override the veto, would have allowed federal funding of stem cell research on new lines of stem cells derived from discarded human embryos created for fertility treatments."
Cause god forgive you do something with the miscarried cells your mother told you to drive to the hospital with
Also, since when does removal of federal funding = ban?
Comment
-
...
Originally posted by davbrucas View PostLMAO...you think that because someone criticizes someone's point of view it means that they are owning them? That's funny. That's what this site is all about...talking shit and getting shit talked to. If you have a short temper or a sensitive side, you shouldnt be here...however, people shouldnt resort to personal attacks...that is how you know you are getting to someone. They get riled the fuck up!
My statement wasnt meant as a personal attack...just stirring the pot. Dont take shit so damn personal, man.
I have no idea if you are liberal or not...heck, I cant remember ever discussing politics with you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 88Kaufmann View PostSince when does removal of federal funding = ban?
Comment
-
...
Originally posted by davbrucas View PostOh, and Line-em up, thanks for not owning me too. Not sure if I could take any more ownage from superstars on the internet.
Comment
Comment