Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GT500's and Camaro ZL-1s are so quaint

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rick Modena
    replied
    Originally posted by Mach1 View Post
    full carbon body, 3450lb curb weight, nice!
    That's bad ass, but I'm sure it will cost around $120K...

    Leave a comment:


  • Mach1
    replied
    full carbon body, 3450lb curb weight, nice!

    Leave a comment:


  • roliath
    replied
    i think it looks nice as fuck, i'd roll the piss outta this one. any others and i'll pass.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trip McNeely
    replied
    The question was more or less directed at Eric because I was in doubt that it was the final decision maker (0-60 time).

    Leave a comment:


  • HarrisonTX
    replied
    That hellcat wont come anywhere close to comparing to the zl1

    Leave a comment:


  • JC316
    replied
    Love the challenger and I don't care how fat it is. Hell, my T-bird SC was 4100lbs with 230hp and it was plenty quick for daily driving.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by Trip McNeely View Post
    How many times have you taken your new 5.0 to the track? lol C'mon, you gotta do better than that.

    As much as I jump on the gas(pretty much every time I hit the left pedal), yes, it makes a big difference. If there isn't any traffic around I still drive like a 16 year old asshole and treat the car like a go cart. That's what it was built for.

    Leave a comment:


  • silverhatch
    replied
    Originally posted by Trip McNeely View Post
    How many times have you taken your new 5.0 to the track? lol C'mon, you gotta do better than that.
    At least 10-15 times.

    Leave a comment:


  • 46Tbird
    replied
    Originally posted by Trip McNeely View Post
    How many times have you taken your new 5.0 to the track? lol C'mon, you gotta do better than that.
    <----- a few times

    And yes, when I test drove a 1100-mile 2010 SRT8 6-speed Challenger, it was a fat, bloated mess.

    The new car will be badass. But I see they still haven't addressed the "too-fucking-small" rear tire that is dictated by the IRS components and small wheelhouses. That's a shame.

    Leave a comment:


  • slow99
    replied
    Originally posted by Big A View Post
    Do you not think that a car that's a full second faster to 60, won't also have more punch at 45?
    So if he doesn't think that it won't ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Trip McNeely
    replied
    Originally posted by Big A View Post
    Do you not think that a car that's a full second faster to 60, won't also have more punch at 45?
    Depends, some get more torque at the top end.

    Leave a comment:


  • Big A
    replied
    Originally posted by Trip McNeely View Post
    For my benefit, I'd be more attracted to a 45-90 time for the highway merges/passing situations. That's just me.
    Do you not think that a car that's a full second faster to 60, won't also have more punch at 45?

    Leave a comment:


  • Trip McNeely
    replied
    Originally posted by Big A View Post
    You don't have to race to realize the benefit of a full second to 60mph in a DD.
    For my benefit, I'd be more attracted to a 45-90 time for the highway merges/passing situations. That's just me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Big A
    replied
    Originally posted by Trip McNeely View Post
    How many times have you taken your new 5.0 to the track? lol C'mon, you gotta do better than that.
    You don't have to race to realize the benefit of a full second to 60mph in a DD.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trip McNeely
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    I would have seriously considered a Challenger R/T when I bought my 5.0 if it wasn't so heavy and a full second slower zero to 60.

    How many times have you taken your new 5.0 to the track? lol C'mon, you gotta do better than that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X