soooo...soap is banned

[bcoop]

Actually, yes. The law sees it as either it is, or it isn't, correct? There are no varying levels of illegal, only of the punishments assessed. What happed with Soap was a matter of morality, not legality.

Semantics. I can argue all day long that there are varying levels of legality. Misdemeanors (a, b, c), felonies (1st, 2nd, 3rd), and then Federal of course.

[Cooter]

he was clearly banned for moral reasons, just like every other person who has been banned from this site was banned

it's not even a permaban, it's a fucking 5 day ban

Chili's knee-jerk reaction to say it was for legal reasons is because no sane person would imagine a world where that shit ISN'T illegal. So, while you got him on a technicality, your devil's advocate argument is worse than a lot of Racrguy's devil's advocate arguments.

There are absolutely varying degrees of illegal and immoral... I don't get pulled over for doing 6 over the limit, but if I do 200, I'm probably going to get locked up.

If I eat a few grapes at the grocery store, nobody gives a shit. If I break into your house and steal your baby, I'm probably going to do some time for it.

Gummy worms out of a prolapse-rose? meh

a baby calf suckin' a gypsy's dick? ban this psycho

[talisman]

Actually, yes. The law sees it as either it is, or it isn't, correct? There are no varying levels of illegal, only of the punishments assessed. What happed with Soap was a matter of morality, not legality.

lol, all illegal acts aren't viewed exactly the same, otherwise the punishment would be the same for all of them. Get real man. Just because the word they are defined by is the same, doesn't mean there aren't different levels of that word being attributed. Get some grey area in your life. You need it.

[talisman]

There is no gray area when it comes to legality.

Yes there is. Someone stealing an apple because they are starving is probably going to get a more lenient punishment that someone blowing up a bank vault. Your arguments on this subject are absurd.

[Pokulski-Blatz]

See my last response. You have seriously disappointed in this thread.

Oh man. I have disappointed someone, what shall I do to atone?

Should we reenact this scene? You can be Tom Green, Ill be the old farmer. I'll bet we could get Brit420 to be the cow.

[Mychael101]

Man, I consider myself lucky. I know I've posted some stuff that rode the line and rattled a few cages before. I still had to laugh at Soap's attempt. Some people are just really really good at seeing the line...and jumping right the hell over it.

[SonicblueGT03]

Yes there is. Someone stealing an apple because they are starving is probably going to get a more lenient punishment that someone blowing up a bank vault. Your arguments on this subject are absurd.

My argument is spot on. Illegal is illegal, only the punishments vary. Which is exactly why the apple stealer gets less punishment than bank vault blower. Both acts are illegal, or contrary to the prevailing legal standards of the land. Simple as that.

[lincolnboy]

dam, all these pages just for penis.

[Pokulski-Blatz]

dam, all these pages just for penis.

Leave it to you to identify that as the wrong thing in Soap's actions. The penis was defiantly the culprit.

[bcoop]

My argument is spot on. Illegal is illegal, only the punishments vary. Which is exactly why the apple stealer gets less punishment than bank vault blower. Both acts are illegal, or contrary to the prevailing legal standards of the land. Simple as that.

Nope.

[Cobraman]

Leave it to you to identify that as the wrong thing in Soap's actions. The penis was defiantly the culprit.

Well at least it was defiant lol

[Chili]

Semantics. I can argue all day long that there are varying levels of legality. Misdemeanors (a, b, c), felonies (1st, 2nd, 3rd), and then Federal of course.

This is what I was going to say.

he was clearly banned for moral reasons, just like every other person who has been banned from this site was banned

it's not even a permaban, it's a fucking 5 day ban

Chili's knee-jerk reaction to say it was for legal reasons is because no sane person would imagine a world where that shit ISN'T illegal. So, while you got him on a technicality, your devil's advocate argument is worse than a lot of Racrguy's devil's advocate arguments.

There are absolutely varying degrees of illegal and immoral... I don't get pulled over for doing 6 over the limit, but if I do 200, I'm probably going to get locked up.

If I eat a few grapes at the grocery store, nobody gives a shit. If I break into your house and steal your baby, I'm probably going to do some time for it.

Gummy worms out of a prolapse-rose? meh

a baby calf suckin' a gypsy's dick? ban this psycho

Absolutely correct on the bold (well, I may call it an assumption rather than "knee-jerk").

That was clearly my mistake. I agree with the rest of your post as well.

[Pokulski-Blatz]

Well at least it was defiant lol

Fuck.

[lincolnboy]

Leave it to you to identify that as the wrong thing in Soap's actions. The penis was defiantly the culprit.

Always is. Ask Maury Povich, you will tell you " you are the father"

[SSMAN]

posted a video of a cow sucking a guys dick.

I laughed...........