Sidenote: I tried every out I could think of; going to a grocery store, online, etc. No dice.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
EFFF Red light cameras
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by matts5.0 View PostTarrant county doesn't play that bullshit.
That is the only way out of it as long as you still own the vehicle and reside at the address on the registration. Now you could move to a county that doesn't have them and get your tags there. If you are selling or trading the car ignore them, they can't do anything. Or if you live in outside of Harris, Tarrant, Dallas or Travis county you can probably ignore them as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BP View PostActually they do, you won't be able to renew online or at a grocery store and depending on who you get at the tax office they may not do it either. I paid the $100 a few weeks ago because I was tired of jacking with it. Officially they are only enforcing scofflaws on tolls but again it depends on who you get and eventually it'll be policy.
That is the only way out of it as long as you still own the vehicle and reside at the address on the registration. Now you could move to a county that doesn't have them and get your tags there. If you are selling or trading the car ignore them, they can't do anything. Or if you live in outside of Harris, Tarrant, Dallas or Travis county you can probably ignore them as well.
Comment
-
Contest it and ask for a review- I got one in Fort Worth similar to your situation. Went down to city department that handles it, reviewed the tape with a supervisor and he dismissed it. He stated they are not perfect but most people never contest it.
Comment
-
I will not pay these, I refuse to. We must starve these robots of tyranny to death."When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
-
This should fix those red light cameras right up
Interested in being a VIP member and donating to the site? Click here http://dfwmustangs.net/forums/payments.php
Comment
-
Nate Cox decided not to blindly pay a photo-enforced traffic ticket that the Washington D.C. DMV tried to stick him with. He beat the system using the Bill of Rights!
Smart Citizen Sticks it to The Man by Fighting his Traffic Ticket
Posted by Faith Braverman • 05 Feb 2014
WASHINGTON, D.C.–Nate Cox received a notification in his mail last year that would intimidate most U.S. citizens. According to the Washington D.C. DMV, Cox’s car was caught speeding on camera. The Photo-Enforced Speeding ticket captures Cox’s car, complete with its abundant libertarian bumper stickers and “ENDW4R” license plate.
The DMV clearly didn’t know who they were dealing with.
“I am in the habit of not taking ‘plea deals’, and I am always in the habit of fighting my tickets and NOT pre-paying them so I don’t have to go to court – like many folks do,” Cox said in his post on VirginiaCopBlock.org.
“[T]hese criminals issuing these tickets are hoping that the people will just get scared and pay, or not want to waste their time with it. However the government has to provide evidence that it was actually ME driving, it’s their burden of proof. Just because they got pictures of my car doesn’t mean I was driving. So, in response to the first letter, I mailed them back the following letter:
To Whom it May Concern,
I received a letter claiming I committed a violation of a speeding law in the District of Columbia on 04/21/2012. As per the instructions, I am writing to plead ‘not guilty’ to this charge. Although this option is said to result in this matter going to court; it is my suggestion that the charges simply be dropped. This suggestion comes out of respect for tax payers, and my request that their hard-earned money not be wasted in such proceedings. As there is no evidence of my involvement with this alleged ‘crime’, as well as the fact that I am not granted my 6th amendment right to face my ‘accuser’ (a camera); I see no way the government could prove my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. I also see find no legal requirement for me to implicate someone else in this process, as it is the government’s responsibility to prove a person’s guilt. It is also my 5th amendment right to remain silent on the matter.
If it is the government’s decision to move forward in this matter, I would request copies of any evidence the prosecution may have of my involvement in the “offense”; as well as, all maintenance records for the camera(s) involved.
Sincerely,
Nathan Cox
United States Army Veteran
After sending that letter, Cox received this dubious post card:
Screen Shot 2014-02-05 at 3.08.25 PM
Finally, over six months later, Cox was informed that his ticket had been completely dismissed for “the government’s failure to meet its burden of proof”. He was understandably thrilled that he’d won his fight against his ticket, and encourages others to do the same, saying, “If there is NO VICTIM, there is NO CRIME!”I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
-
Originally posted by racrguy View PostI'd give a lawyer double what the fine is before I give the state any money, and I don't much care for lawyers much either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mach1 View PostThis should fix those red light cameras right up
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler
Comment
Comment