Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can you say knee jerk by Obama?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can you say knee jerk by Obama?

    Guns don't kill people...people kill people!

    http://www.newsweek.com/2011/01/27/w...n-control.html

    White House to Push Gun Control
    Obama intentionally did not mention gun control in his State of the Union, but aides say that in the next two weeks the administration will unveil a campaign to get Congress to toughen existing laws.
    Evan Vucci / AP
    Arizona Congressmen Jeff Flake (left) and Raul Grijalva sit next to the empty seat of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords on Capitol Hill before President Obama's recent State of the Union address.
    At the beginning of his State of the Union address, President Obama tipped his hat to Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who’s now recuperating in a Houston medical facility. But throughout the hourlong speech, he never addressed the issue at the core of the Giffords tragedy—gun control—and what lawmakers would, or should, do to reform American firearm-access laws.

    That was intentional, according to the White House. An administration official says Obama didn’t mention guns in his speech because of the omnipresent controversy surrounding the Second Amendment and gun control. Tuesday’s speech was designed to be more about the economy and how, as Obama repeated nine times, the U.S. could “win the future.”

    But in the next two weeks, the White House will unveil a new gun-control effort in which it will urge Congress to strengthen current laws, which now allow some mentally unstable people, such as alleged Arizona shooter Jared Loughner, to obtain certain assault weapons, in some cases without even a background check.

    Tuesday night after the speech, Obama adviser David Plouffe said to NBC News that the president would not let the moment after the Arizona shootings pass without pushing for some change in the law, to prevent another similar incident. “It’s a very important issue, and one I know there’s going to be debate about on the Hill.”


    The White House said that to avoid being accused of capitalizing on the Arizona shootings for political gain, Obama will address the gun issue in a separate speech, likely early next month. He’s also expected to use Arizona as a starting point, but make the case that America’s gun laws have been too loose for much longer than just the past few weeks.

    As the White House prepares its strategy, several gun-policy groups are saying they were burned by the lack of any mention of guns in the president’s highest-profile speech of the year. “President Obama tonight failed to challenge old assumptions on the need for, and political possibilities of, reducing the gun violence—which he suggested should be done two weeks ago in Tucson,” said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the nation’s largest gun-safety group. No group said it had been consulted by the White House regarding legislative suggestions.

    Meanwhile, the National Rifle Association has stayed largely silent following the Arizona shootings. Asked about a specialized White House effort on guns, a spokesman for the powerful gun lobby declined to comment.

  • #2
    Well it was a fun hobby while it lasted.

    But seriously, hopefully they just strengthen the whole background check process. Legally that guy who shot the congresswoman should not have been able to buy a gun.... but he did. Unfortunately we all know that wont be the case. They will push for a ban on magazines, certain "assault weapons", and a bunch of other bullshit.
    Originally posted by lincolnboy
    After watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm all for mentally unstable people not getting assault rifles, I just hope they leave the rest of us alone.
      .223 > 911

      Comment


      • #4
        Handguns are assault weapons now? People with guns aren't the problem. It's all the people without guns.
        "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

        Comment


        • #5
          If they want to ban something, ban throw away guns. Then they might make it harder for a criminal/mentally unstable person to get one.


          I can get a $50 gun in about 10 minutes. Hell, I could price shop the local crackheads and get one cheaper than that.

          The only they are going to be doing is fucking with law abiding people and their guns.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Muffrazr View Post
            If they want to ban something, ban throw away guns. Then they might make it harder for a criminal/mentally unstable person to get one.


            I can get a $50 gun in about 10 minutes. Hell, I could price shop the local crackheads and get one cheaper than that.

            The only they are going to be doing is fucking with law abiding people and their guns.
            This right here is what is really going to happen. They just haven't figured out that IF you want a gun, criminal or not, you can and will get it. All they will be doing is making it harder for the person LEGALLY obtaining one.

            I recondition headlights on most cars for $50.00. If interested shoot me a pm.

            Comment


            • #7
              Wrong mood in the country for the wrong guy to push the wrong legislation that will have the wrong outcome.

              I hope he has a helmet.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                Wrong mood in the country for the wrong guy to push the wrong legislation that will have the wrong outcome.

                I hope he has a helmet.
                I hope he doesn't.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Let his dumb ass bring it on. The NRA is powerful as hell in Washington right now and they'll crucify his sorry ass. One more nail in his coffin will be good news.
                  Originally posted by racrguy
                  What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                  Originally posted by racrguy
                  Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SouthernSVT View Post
                    I'm all for mentally unstable people not getting assault rifles, I just hope they leave the rest of us alone.
                    Many in Washington claim that voting Republican or being a Tea Party member proves that you are mentally unstable.

                    Who do you believe should be able to determine what exactly mentally unstable means? A BATF bureaucrat?
                    Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Soon we will all be walking around in bubble suits, driving bumper cars because the govmt will have outlawed anything that is a danger to yourself.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by svo855 View Post
                        Many in Washington claim that voting Republican or being a Tea Party member proves that you are mentally unstable.

                        Who do you believe should be able to determine what exactly mentally unstable means? A BATF bureaucrat?
                        The funny thing is that now all republicans are being called teapartiers by liberals. "You don't think Obama is the best things since sliced bread? Teapartier!"
                        "Any dog under 50lbs is a cat and cats are pointless." - Ron Swanson

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X