So, I guess Ive been working with a serial bank robber

[stevo]

Posted via IPhone. Didn't look that shitty originally, in breaking everything up. But I appreciate the kind words.


I would also assume that his connection to Breaking Bad, would be the white collar "Average Joe" kind of guy committing crimes, under the guise of being an everyday All American family man. And I couldn't agree more with the correlation.

I wonder if he'll sue the producers of the show for giving him the idea, like the parents who claim rock music turned their spawn into idiots?

Stevo

[LS1Goat]

Its is weird when youre in contact with what seems a normal person and then find out they've done something crazy.


When I work at Huffines Chevy in Lewisville, in 09-10, I was and estimator at that time. I was working on a green S10 job. The owner was a elderly man, reminded me of Wilferd Bremly (sp?), the quaker oats guy. He was the calmest sweetest man. We we did the job delivered the vehicle, I thought he was one of the nicest customers. About 2 -3 months later, Im in the kitchen at the house and I hear his name. I perked up and watched the news. I dont remember the details, but he ended up going to lunch with a young lady friend of his and killed her in that very same truck in Carrollton. What little dealing I had with him, I would have never thought he was capable of something like that.

If I remember correctly, it's the case where they were last seen on camera together at the Market Street in Coppell. He killed her shortly after they left.

[slow99]

Yes. "He and I" would be the grammatically correct way to explain, that this bank robber guy.... and myself, would engage in conversation.

This, however, makes me want to kick a puppy.

[Shaggin Wagon]

If I remember correctly, it's the case where they were last seen on camera together at the Market Street in Coppell. He killed her shortly after they left.

Yup, I was thinking Carrollton, but yes, thats the one.

[Bringit]

This, however, makes me want to kick a puppy.

I think this is one of those contexts where it's important to remember that "grammar" is essentially a post factum attempt to "describe/codify" how people actually use language, rather than a set of prescriptive rules telling us what we can and can't say.

“Myself” is no better than “I” as an object. “Myself” is not a sort of all-purpose intensive form of “me” or “I.” Use “myself” only when you have used “I” earlier in the same sentence: “I am not particularly fond of goat cheese myself.” “I kept half the loot for myself.” All this confusion can easily be avoided if you just remove the second party from the sentences where you feel tempted to use “myself” as an object or feel nervous about “me.” You wouldn’t say, “The IRS sent the refund check to I,” so you shouldn’t say “The IRS sent the refund check to my wife and I” either. And you shouldn’t say “to my wife and myself.” The only correct way to say this is, “The IRS sent the refund check to my wife and me.” Still sounds too casual? Get over it.

The bank robber and I. (wrong)
The bank robber and me. (correct, but sounds wrong to some)
The bank robber and myself. (wrong, but sounds better to some)


So, Fuck you for being correct and ruining my day.

[YALE]

Latin? Really? You are not allowed to use the term, "post factum," if you can't spell, or properly utilize dependent clauses. And on that note, no, "he and I," is not correct, because the only person mentioned (apart from you) in the previous sentence is your wife.

[JP135]

Latin? Really? You are not allowed to use the term, "post factum," if you can't spell, or properly utilize dependent clauses. And on that note, no, "he and I," is not correct, because the only person mentioned (apart from you) in the previous sentence is your wife.

Stercus accidit!

[Zeus The LSX Coupe]

This thread reminds me of this movie.......

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXGNevA5Wt0[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uAHqRaZ1B0[/ame]

[YALE]

Stercus accidit!

Vere!

[lincolnboy]

he would be fun to hang out with at a topless joint. drinks on him.