Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

After 41 years in solitary confinement, conviction overturned.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • After 41 years in solitary confinement, conviction overturned.

    Fuuuuuck.


    NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A 71-year-old Louisiana prisoner who spent 41 years in solitary confinement and is now dying of cancer was released late Tuesday from prison, his attorneys said.

    Late Tuesday, U.S. District Chief Judge Brian Jackson in Baton Rouge denied the state's motion seeking to block his earlier order overturning Herman Wallace's 1974 murder conviction in the death of Angola guard Brent Miller.

    Jackson had also ordered a new trial because women were unconstitutionally excluded from the grand jury that indicted Wallace in the guard's death. And, he ordered him immediately released.

    Wallace's attorneys said the freed prisoner left a correctional center in St. Gabriel by ambulance Tuesday evening and was expected to go to LSU Interim Hospital in New Orleans for treatment of advanced terminal liver cancer.

    "Tonight, Herman Wallace has left the walls of Louisiana prisons and will be able to receive the medical care that his advanced liver cancer requires," his legal team said in a statement.

    Earlier Tuesday, Jackson overturned Wallace's 1974 murder conviction in Miller's death.

    "The record in this case makes clear that Mr. Wallace's grand jury was improperly chosen in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of 'the equal protection of the laws' ... and that the Louisiana courts, when presented with the opportunity to correct this error, failed to do so," Jackson wrote.

    He added, "Our Constitution requires this result even where, as here, it means overturning Mr. Wallace's conviction nearly forty years after it was entered."

    George Kendall, one of Wallace's attorneys, told The Associated Press in an earlier telephone interview the decision gives his client "some measure of justice after a lifetime of injustice," but his response was tempered by the grim outlook for Wallace's health.

    "He's pleased," Kendall said of Wallace's reaction after hearing of Tuesday's ruling, "but he's quite ill."

    Wallace, whose birthday is Oct. 13, has been diagnosed with terminal liver cancer. Kendall said he "ceased receiving treatment a couple of weeks ago."

    Kendall said the state had filed notice it would appeal Jackson's ruling. A telephone message left with East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney Hillar C. Moore III's office was not immediately returned. The state Department of Public Safety and Corrections referred all questions to Moore's office.

    Wallace and two other inmates convicted in the 23-year-old guard's slaying came to be known as the "Angola 3."

    Wallace, of New Orleans, was serving a 50-year armed robbery sentence when Miller was fatally stabbed in 1972. Wallace and the two others convicted in Miller's death were moved to isolation at the Louisiana State Penitentiary in Angola. In 2009, Wallace was moved to "closed-cell restriction" at Hunt Correctional in St. Gabriel and recently was taken to the prison's hospital unit.

    Kendall said his client has asked that, after his demise, they continue to press the lawsuit challenging Wallace's "unconstitutional confinement in solitary confinement for four decades."

    "It is Mr. Wallace's hope that this litigation will help ensure that others, including his lifelong friend and fellow 'Angola 3' member, Albert Woodfox, do not continue to suffer such cruel and unusual confinement even after Mr. Wallace is gone," his legal team said in a written statement.

    Kendall said Woodfox won full habeas relief last year but the state has appealed that as well. The case is pending before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

    In 2010, Woodfox was moved to the David Wade Correctional Center in Homer, where he remains in custody.

    Woodfox and Wallace have continued to deny involvement in Miller's killing and say they were targeted because they helped establish a prison chapter of the Black Panther Party at the Angola prison in 1971, set up demonstrations and organized strikes for better conditions in the prison.

    Amnesty International USA last year delivered a petition to Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal's office, containing 65,000 signatures from people around the world who called the men's solitary confinement inhuman and degrading.

    The group's executive director, Steven W. Hawkins, welcomed the court's ruling involving Wallace. "Tragically, this step toward justice has come as Herman is dying from cancer with only days or hours left to live," he said in a statement. "No ruling can erase the cruel, inhuman and degrading prison conditions he endured for more than 41 years."

    The third man, Robert King, was released after 29 years in solitary confinement. King, convicted of killing a fellow inmate in 1973, was released in 2001 after his conviction was reversed and he pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of conspiracy to commit murder.

  • #2
    I'm not sure how I feel about this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Good for them.

      Comment


      • #4
        Why solitary confinement all of those years.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by line-em-up View Post
          Why solitary confinement all of those years.
          Killing a guard?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
            I'm not sure how I feel about this.
            Agreed.
            Originally posted by BradM
            But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
            Originally posted by Leah
            In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not sure either. It's a technicality, not clearing because of a DNA test or something.
              Originally posted by MR EDD
              U defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ceyko View Post
                I'm not sure either. It's a technicality, not clearing because of a DNA test or something.
                Either do it right or don't do it all.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
                  I'm not sure how I feel about this.
                  Ambivalent

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ceyko View Post
                    I'm not sure either. It's a technicality, not clearing because of a DNA test or something.
                    Originally posted by David View Post
                    Either do it right or don't do it all.
                    I would agree if this were a death penalty case but I don't agree with it at all unless they can show some evidence that he was wrongfully convicted. In this case, it was a technicality at the grand jury level. That's just for his indictment, not his trial.

                    That said, Angola did this guy very wrong. What the article didn't mention is that prison authorities withheld cancer medications and treatments for months after he was diagnosed. He might not be dying now if not for that. IMO Jindal should have commuted his sentence on humanitarian grounds.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Sgt Beavis View Post
                      I would agree if this were a death penalty case but I don't agree with it at all unless they can show some evidence that he was wrongfully convicted. In this case, it was a technicality at the grand jury level. That's just for his indictment, not his trial.

                      That said, Angola did this guy very wrong. What the article didn't mention is that prison authorities withheld cancer medications and treatments for months after he was diagnosed. He might not be dying now if not for that. IMO Jindal should have commuted his sentence on humanitarian grounds.
                      So because it isn't a death penalty case, constutional rights and laws have no bearing on any other judicial process?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by David View Post
                        So because it isn't a death penalty case, constutional rights and laws have no bearing on any other judicial process?
                        Have a retrial, if it's proven there is a shadow of a doubt, set him free and pay restitution, if not he needs to rightfully die in jail.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Big A View Post
                          Have a retrial, if it's proven there is a shadow of a doubt, set him free and pay restitution, if not he needs to rightfully die in jail.
                          He is being retried. Do we keep locked up all people awaiting trial? Essentially what they're doing is starting the trial process over. The guy has liver cancer and has been in prison for over 40 years, the odds of him getting away are slim to none.

                          Jackson had also ordered a new trial

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Big A View Post
                            Have a retrial, if it's proven there is a shadow of a doubt, set him free and pay restitution, if not he needs to rightfully die in jail.
                            Never argued against that.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              There was an AMA on Reddit a couple weeks ago w/ a guy who was in solitary for 8 yrs in CO.

                              Interesting stuff: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comment...nt_8_years_in/

                              What is a day in sol. Confinement like exactly? Sorry if already asked

                              Originally posted by RyanPettigrew
                              Everyday is monotonous. All morning I would study and write. During the afternoon I would work out and meditate. At night, I would read and watch t.v. We also talked to each other a lot behind the doors, through vents and through toilets.
                              Originally posted by Jisamaniac
                              Through toilets?!?! Interesting. Can you explain this further?
                              Originally posted by RyanPettigrew
                              If we take the water out of a toilet bowl and roll up a manila envelope, we can talk through the plumbing. We also would send messages via fishing lines down the toilet. I'd have a message tied to a string and would flush. The guy below me would flush his string with a weight on it and they'd wrap around each other. Then we could pass back and forth.
                              Originally posted by Sir-Dingle-Berry
                              Not being funny but that is fairly amazing, do you think you would have coped without any communication?
                              Originally posted by RyanPettigrew
                              I think I would have lost it completely if I was so isolated that I couldn't even talk to anyone.


                              Originally posted by whoamiamwho
                              I know it's a bit of a cliché question, but I might as well ask.

                              Was there anything that surprised you when you got out of prison? Any major differences you had to get used to?
                              Originally posted by RyanPettigrew
                              Technology was very overwhelming.

                              I honestly thought that solitary confinement was you just sit in a room all day every day, with nothing to do. Just complete emptiness and boredom. I'm glad you got to at least read letters and books. Thanks for doing this, I hope your life is well.
                              Originally posted by RyanPettigrew
                              I would've preferred to be locked in there with updated books rather than tv but glad it wasn't the old school solitary where I sat in the dark for 8 years. That would've been a nightmare.
                              Originally posted by ETpownhome
                              Seriously. That would truly drive a person to the end.
                              Originally posted by RyanPettigrew
                              I couldn't have done it
                              his blog: http://amadmanspathtoreason.com/2013/07/11/freedom/
                              Last edited by Strychnine; 10-02-2013, 10:22 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X