Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Health risks of e-cigs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Health risks of e-cigs




    HILADELPHIA, Aug. 8, 2013/PRNewwire-USNewswire -- E-cigarette users can breathe a little easier today. A study just released by Professor Igor Burstyn, Drexel University School of Public Health, confirms that chemicals in electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) pose no health concern for users or bystanders. This is the first definitive study of e-cigarette chemistry and finds that there are no health concerns based on generally accepted exposure limits.


    E-cigarettes are devices that heat a nicotine solution to create an aerosol (called “vapor”) that the user inhales, similar to smoking a cigarette. They are used as a low-risk substitute for smoking by millions of former smokers, and their increasing popularity seems to account for the current downward trend in smoking in the U.S. and some other countries. While experts agree that the risks posed by e-cigarettes are significantly less than those posed by smoking, there had been some debate about how much lower the risk was.


    By reviewing over 9,000 observations about the chemistry of the vapor and the liquid in e-cigarettes, Dr. Burstyn was able to determine that the levels of contaminants e-cigarette users are exposed to are insignificant, far below levels that would pose any health risk. Additionally, there is no health risk to bystanders. Proposals to ban e-cigarettes in places where smoking is banned have been based on concern there is a potential risk to bystanders, but the study shows there is no concern.


    This was the first study funded by the by The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives (CASAA) Research Fund. CASAA, the leading consumer advocacy group promoting the availability and use of low-risk alternatives to smoking, is an all-volunteer, donation-funded organization. CASAA President Elaine Keller said of the study, “Over the years, there have been a lot of small studies of e-cigarette liquid and vapor, but those studies were either ignored or misinterpreted. Those that showed even the slightest contamination were used for propaganda by those who object to e-cigarettes because they look like smoking. We realized that an expert review was needed to give an unbiased explanation of the available scientific evidence for our membership and policy makers. We reached out to our membership and they enthusiastically donated to make it possible.”


    CASAA Scientific Director, Carl V. Phillips, summarized the importance of the study, saying “It has always been clear that e-cigarettes were much lower risk than smoking, but there was uncertainty about whether continuing to inhale a mix of chemicals posed a measurable risk. Even those of us who have long encouraged smokers to switch are a bit surprised that even the worst-case-scenario risks are so low. This study assures us that e-cigarettes are as low risk as other smoke-free tobacco and nicotine products, like smokeless tobacco and NRT. All of these products are about 99% less harmful than smoking, and so smokers who switch to them gain basically the same health benefits as if they quit tobacco and nicotine entirely.”


    Dr. Phillips added that “there has been a call for ‘regulatory science’ by the FDA. This is exactly the type of science that is needed to make good regulation and informed individual decisions: it summarizes all of the available knowledge and puts the numbers in a useful perspective.”


    The study did caution that e-cigarette users are inhaling substantial quantities of the main chemicals in e-cigarette liquid (propylene glycol and glycerin). While these chemicals are not considered dangerous and the levels are far below occupational exposure limits, Dr. Burstyn did suggest ongoing monitoring to confirm that there is no risk. The chemical contaminants are of even less concern. While there have been many claims that formaldehyde, acrolein, nitrosamines, metals, and ethylene glycol found in e-cigarette vapor poses a health hazard, the study concluded that all of these have been found only at trivial levels that pose no health concern.


    The study did not address the effects of nicotine because e-cigarette users are consuming it intentionally. Nicotine, when it does not involve smoking, is very low risk and has not been clearly shown to cause any disease. However, like caffeine and other common indulgences, it may cause some tiny risk of heart attack and stroke, and so e-cigarettes, along with other tobacco and nicotine products, are probably not risk-free. If there is any risk from nicotine, however, it is so low that it is similar to everyday hazards like drinking coffee or eating dessert, and is far less than the risk from smoking.


    The study is available at http://publichealth.drexel.edu/SiteD...0e603/ms08.pdf

    For summary and discussion go to
    by Carl V Phillips [UPDATE 4, 11 Jun 15: A correction to one of the results in the study has been posted to this blog by the author. As of yet, the journal has not posted the correction as requeste…

    Saved and Texan by the Grace of God, Redneck by choice.

  • #2
    Pretty tired of the whole e-cig fad.

    Comment


    • #3
      Making vaping!

      Comment


      • #4
        In before Elvis.

        Comment


        • #5
          Fad or not, it's better for all involved than continuing smoking.

          Comment


          • #6
            very nice. don't really see it going away anytime soon.
            WRX

            Comment


            • #7
              IBSkidmark

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by JP135 View Post
                Pretty tired of the whole e-cig fad.
                Do u smoke? I did for 12 years. 2 packs a day. This fad helped me quit. 3 months so far. A really good e-cig has done the trick so far. Only thing that has worked. Not a fad too me. Its been a life changer.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The biggest health risk is of a severe yeast infection in your manjina.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Buick has a mangina. Buick has a mangina.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Ted View Post
                      Buick has a mangina. Buick has a mangina.

                      I got a yeast infection in it from a tall Latino bukkake party.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So the only risk is of turning into a great big douchebag? Good to know.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by talisman View Post
                          So the only risk is of turning into a great big douchebag? Good to know.
                          So how long have you been doing it?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by CWO View Post
                            So how long have you been doing it?


                            Good one!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by JP135 View Post
                              Pretty tired of the whole e-cig fad.
                              People will complain about anything.
                              Originally posted by BradM
                              But, just like condoms and women's rights, I don't believe in them.
                              Originally posted by Leah
                              In other news: Brent's meat melts in your mouth.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X