Life on other planets.

[slow99]

All of the intelligent life in the universe posts on this site.

[mstng86]

Neat stuff....

http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014...thin-20-years/

Sure makes you feel pretty small.

[BradM]

Haha, 73 to 1 right now. Who is the 1?

[Gargamel]

Chances are there is other life out there.

It wouldn't surprise me if we found simple forms of life in our own solar system.

Due to the vast distances involved, the chances of us stumbling across an "intelligent" alien species is pretty slim in my opinion.

[01vnms4v]

Glad this was brought back up, was on CNN today and....

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/14/tech/n...html?hpt=te_t1

(CNN) -- Scientists looking for signs of life in the universe -- as well as another planet like our own -- are a lot closer to their goal than people realize.

That was the consensus of a panel on the search for life in the universe held at NASA headquarters Monday in Washington. The discussion focused not only on the philosophical question of whether we're alone in the universe but also on the technological advances made in an effort to answer that question.

"We believe we're very, very close in terms of technology and science to actually finding the other Earth and our chance to find signs of life on another world," said Sara Seager, a MacArthur Fellow and professor of planetary science and physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"Finding Earth's twin, that's kind of the holy grail," said John Grunsfeld, an astronaut who helped repair the Hubble Space Telescope in 2009 and is now an associate administrator at NASA.

Scientists have made stellar strides in the past few years alone.

"We already know that our galaxy has at least 100 billion planets, and we didn't know that five years ago," said Matt Mountain, director of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Maryland.

He credited the work of the Kepler Space Telescope for these new discoveries. The planet-hunting Kepler probe, launched in 2009, finds planets by looking for dips in the brightness of a star as a planet transits, or crosses, in front of that star.

Kepler also found the first Earth-size planet that orbits in a star's habitable zone, the area around a star where a planet could exist with liquid water on its surface.

The Kepler mission builds upon the stalwart Hubble Space Telescope, which launched in 1990 and was the first of its kind to be placed in space. As Hubble orbits the Earth, it allows scientists to peer back in time, into distant galaxies, and yields stunning images of the cosmos.
Hubble has helped shape our awareness of our planet's place in an ever-changing universe.

The Earth, though 4.5 billion years old, is a newcomer, said John Mather, senior project scientist on NASA's next-generation James Webb Space
Telescope. It's only about one-third of the age of the universe.
And our galaxy is ever-evolving, with "about five or 10 new stars being born per year in our Milky Way," Mather said.

Planet hunters

Hubble's astounding views come from a vantage point only 353 miles above our Earth.

In comparison, the James Webb telescope will be a whopping 930,000 miles from our planet. That's close to four times the distance between the Earth and the moon.

Webb is set to launch in 2018.

Mountain, who is the telescope scientist for Webb, said scientists now know where every single star is within 200 light years of the Sun.

NASA's assembled panelists said, if they follow this map of stars, they're certain to find a multitude of new planets.

"Every star in the sky is a sun, and if our sun has planets, we naturally expect those other stars to have planets also, and they do," said Seager. She said if someone looked up at a starry sky and wondered how many of the stars have planets, the answer would be "basically every single one."

Some of a star's light will shine through the atmosphere, said Seager, and the Webb telescope should be able to pick up gases from the planet that are imprinted on the atmosphere. While the Webb telescope wasn't designed to find signs of life on another planet, it can spot biosignature gases -- gases in the atmosphere produced by life.

Seager said, with the James Webb telescope, "we have our first chance, our first capability of finding signs of life on another planet. Now nature just has to provide for us."

Spotting Earths

Finding small planets, ones the size of Earth, is challenging, in part because they produce fainter signals, said Dave Gallagher, director for astronomy and physics at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who likened it to spotting a firefly beside a searchlight.

That difficulty doesn't dull the hunt for another Earth or signs of life.

NASA administrator Charles Bolden said he counts himself among the people who "are probably convinced that it's highly improbable in the limitless vastness of the universe that we humans stand alone."

[Scott Mc]

How did I miss this? LMAO at this thread. Reminds me shit doesn't change that much around here besides opinions.

[tribaltalon]

Well, I think life as far as alien life goes can be a very subjective thing. There might be beings that are composed of elements and substances completely foreign/invisible/etc to us, that do not function in a way that means alive to us. So then, the question becomes; What is life? -- Morgan Freeman voice.

[lincolnboy]

Earth keeps going on without rain, we will end up dry like the other planets.

[Nash B.]

I want to believe.

[slow99]

Earth keeps going on without rain, we will end up dry like the other planets.

It's so dry, water is leaving the fucking atmosphere.

[sc281]

Earth keeps going on without rain, we will end up dry like the other planets.

Wut?

[Denny]

Wut?

You know, the new water this planet receives from the sky.

[Nash B.]

I thought we got our water from meteor showers.

[DON SVO]

I thought we got our water from meteor showers.

I thought that was golden showers?

It's why momma said not to stand outside and try to bite the rain.

[Frank]

I figure intelligent life avoids us. We're like the Garland of the universe.